Suppr超能文献

评价临床诊断假设与尸检解剖病理诊断之间的差异。

Evaluation of the discrepancy between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and anatomopathological diagnoses resulting from autopsies.

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Legal, Etica Medica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.

Instituto de Matematica e Estatistica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e1197. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1197. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

An objective of clinical autopsies is to determine the final cause of death and the pathological changes that may have triggered it. Despite advances in Medicine, the level of discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnoses remains significant. The aim of this study was to compare the data obtained from autopsies carried out at the São Bernardo do Campo/SP Death Verification Section with clinical diagnostic hypotheses proposed during medical care.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study involving the comparison of necroscopic reports issued by the São Bernardo do Campo/São Paulo Death Verification Section in 2014 and 2015 and the Cadaver Referral Guides completed by attending physicians prior to the necroscopic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 465 cases were analyzed. In general, discrepancies between the clinical diagnostic hypothesis and the autopsy diagnosis occurred in 28% of the cases. A logistic regression model, with diagnostic discrepancy as a response variable and sex, age, duration of care, type of institution providing medical care and organ system as explanatory variables, was fit to the data; the results indicated that all explanatory variables with the exception of organ system are not significant (p>0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and autopsy diagnoses continue to occur, despite new developments in complementary examinations and therapies. The odds of a discrepancy when patients present with diseases of the cardiac system are greater than those when there are problems in the vascular, endocrine and neurological systems.

摘要

目的

临床尸检的目的是确定死亡的最终原因和可能引发死亡的病理变化。尽管医学取得了进步,但临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异仍然很大。本研究旨在比较圣保罗圣贝尔纳多杜坎波/SP 死因验证科进行的尸检数据与医疗期间提出的临床诊断假设。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,比较了 2014 年和 2015 年圣保罗圣贝尔纳多杜坎波/SP 死因验证科发布的尸体解剖报告和主治医生在尸体解剖检查前填写的尸体转介指南。

结果

共分析了 465 例病例。一般来说,临床诊断假设与尸检诊断之间存在差异的病例占 28%。使用诊断差异作为因变量,性别、年龄、护理时间、提供医疗保健的机构类型和器官系统作为解释变量的逻辑回归模型拟合数据;结果表明,除了器官系统外,所有解释变量都不显著(p>0.132)。

结论

尽管新的补充检查和治疗方法不断发展,但临床诊断假设与尸检诊断之间仍存在差异。当患者患有心脏系统疾病时,出现差异的可能性大于血管、内分泌和神经系统出现问题时的可能性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the discrepancy between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and anatomopathological diagnoses resulting from autopsies.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e1197. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1197. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
Unexpected findings and misdiagnoses in coroner's autopsies performed for trauma at the University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018 Sep;14(3):314-321. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-9983-9. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.
5
Discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and hospital autopsy: A comparative retrospective analysis of 1,112 cases.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0255490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255490. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in São Paulo, Brazil.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;7(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235257.86519.16.
7
Autopsy interrogation of emergency medicine dispute cases: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect?
J Clin Pathol. 2018 Jan;71(1):67-71. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204484. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
8
[Analysis of the major clinical-pathological discrepancies in autopsies of adults in a tertiary referral hospital between 2008-2017].
Rev Esp Patol. 2021 Apr-Jun;54(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses and Autopsy Findings: Six-Year Retrospective Study.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Sep;141(9):1262-1266. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0488-OA. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Infectious Causes of Death: An Autopsy-Based Study of 546 Cases.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 4;12(2):ofaf065. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf065. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
In Defense of Clinical Autopsy and Its Practice in Cuba.
MEDICC Rev. 2017 Jan;19(1):37-41. doi: 10.37757/MR2017.V19.N1.7.
2
[The current role of autopsy in current clinical practice].
Med Clin (Barc). 2015 Oct 5;145(7):313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
3
An analysis of 60 years of autopsy data from Zhejiang university in Hangzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e112500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112500. eCollection 2014.
4
The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist.
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jun;67(6):512-9. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202122. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):894-902. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000803. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
6
State-of-the-art of visualization in post-mortem imaging.
APMIS. 2012 Apr;120(4):316-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02857.x.
7
Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study.
Mod Pathol. 2012 Jun;25(6):777-83. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.199. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Clinical and pathological discrepancies and cardiovascular findings in 409 consecutive autopsies.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Dec;97(6):449-55. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000111. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
9
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验