[Application study on improving the methods of endotracheal cuff pressure measurement to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia].

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intra cuff pressure changes during improved and the traditional method of cuff pressure measurement, then evaluate the effects of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention. The results highlighted practical recommendations in the process of ETT cuff pressure measurement.

METHODS

(1) Experimental studies were carried out on the tracheal model with two groups: traditional pressure measurement group and improved pressure measurement group. The traditional pressure measurement group was connected to a handheld pressure gauge with the indicate cuff to get the intra-cuff pressure. The improved method was to insert a 3-way stopcock between the handheld pressure gauge and the indicate cuff. The 3-way stopcock to stabilize handheld pressure gauge reading at 32 cmHO (1 cmHO = 0.098 kPa) before measure the intra-cuff pressure. The pressure loss caused by two pressure measurement methods and the leakage of liquid on the balloon after 10 minutes was compared. (2) Clinical researches: a historic cohort study, patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from June 2014 to May 2018 were enrolled. The control group (249 cases) was treated with traditional method during June 2014 to May 2016, and the observation group (314 cases) was treated with improved method during June 2016 to May 2018. Clusters of strategies and actions of VAP prevention were applied in both groups. Incidence of VAP, duration of MV, and the length of ICU stay were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

(1) Experimental study: the pressure leakage of the traditional pressure measurement group was (10.18±0.47) cmHO, and that of the improved pressure measurement group was (1.33±0.42) cmHO, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (t = 32.535, P = 0.000). All fluid on the cuffs leak after 10 minutes of traditional ways of measurement, however, no visible fluid on the cuffs leaked with improved procedures. (2) Clinical research: the incidence of VAP in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group, however there was no significant difference [5.10% (16/314) vs. 8.43% (21/249), P > 0.05]. The duration of MV and the length of ICU stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (days: 9.93±3.14 vs. 16.77±5.45, 11.63 ±2.28 vs. 19.12±5.10, both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved procedures of intra-cuff pressure measurement is a practical method to avoid the pressure leakage and fluid leakage, and the clinical course of MV patients can be significantly improved by combining the clusters of nursing strategies and actions.