Boulos David, Fikretoglu Deniz
Directorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e028849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028849.
The primary objective was to explore differences in perceived need for care (PNC), mental health services use (MHSU) and perceived sufficiency of care (PSC) between Canadian Armed Forces Regular Force (RegF) and Reserve Force (ResF) personnel with an objective need for mental health services.
Data came from the 2013 Canadian Armed Forces Mental Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey of serving personnel (n=72 629). Analyses were among those with an Afghanistan deployment and an identified mental disorder (population n=6160; sampled n=868). Logistic regression compared PNC, MHSU and PSC between RegF and ResF. Covariate-adjusted marginal prevalence difference estimates were computed.
The primary outcomes were PNC, MHSU and PSC. Each had three service categories, including an aggregate 'any' of the three: (1) information about problems, treatments or services; (2) medication and (3) counselling.
ResF had an 10.5% (95% CI -16.7% to -4.4%) lower perceived need for medication services but PNC differences were not significant for other service categories. MHSU tended to be lower for ResF; 9.1% (95%CI -15.5% to -2.6%) lower for medication, 5.4% (95% CI -11.5% to 0.7%) lower, with marginal significance, for counselling and 11.3% (95% CI -17.3% to -5.2%) lower for the 'any' service category. Additionally, ResF tended to have a lower fully met need for care; 13.4% (95% CI -22.1% to -4.6%) lower for information, 15.3% (95% CI -22.9% to -7.6%) lower for counselling and 14.6% (95% CI -22.4% to -6.8%) lower for the 'any' service category.
Our findings suggest MHSU and PSC differences between Canadian RegF and ResF personnel that are not fully accounted for by PNC differences. Deficits in ResF members' perceptions of the sufficiency of information services and counselling services suggest perceived, or experienced, barriers to care beyond any PNC barriers. Additional research assessing barriers to mental healthcare is warranted.
主要目的是探讨在客观上需要心理健康服务的加拿大武装部队正规部队(RegF)和预备役部队(ResF)人员之间,在感知到的护理需求(PNC)、心理健康服务使用情况(MHSU)和感知到的护理充足性(PSC)方面的差异。
数据来自2013年加拿大武装部队心理健康调查,这是一项对在职人员(n = 72629)的横断面调查。分析对象为有阿富汗部署经历且被确诊患有精神障碍的人员(总体n = 6160;样本n = 868)。采用逻辑回归比较RegF和ResF之间的PNC、MHSU和PSC。计算了协变量调整后的边际患病率差异估计值。
主要结局为PNC、MHSU和PSC。每个指标都有三个服务类别,包括这三个类别的综合“任何一项”:(1)关于问题、治疗或服务的信息;(2)药物治疗;(3)咨询服务。
ResF对药物治疗服务的感知需求低10.5%(95%CI为-16.7%至-4.4%),但在其他服务类别中PNC差异不显著。ResF的MHSU往往较低;药物治疗方面低9.1%(95%CI为-15.5%至-2.6%),咨询服务方面低5.4%(95%CI为-11.5%至0.7%),具有边际显著性,“任何一项”服务类别低11.3%(95%CI为-17.3%至-5.2%)。此外,ResF对护理的完全满足需求往往较低;信息方面低13.4%(95%CI为-22.1%至-4.6%),咨询服务方面低15.3%(95%CI为-22.9%至-7.6%),“任何一项”服务类别低14.6%(95%CI为-22.4%至-6.8%)。
我们的研究结果表明,加拿大RegF和ResF人员之间的MHSU和PSC差异不能完全由PNC差异来解释。ResF成员对信息服务和咨询服务充足性的认知不足表明,除了任何PNC障碍之外,还存在感知到的或实际经历的护理障碍。有必要进行更多研究来评估心理健康护理的障碍。