Lonie Sarah, Sachs Roger, Shen Amanda, Hunter-Smith David J, Rozen Warren M, Seifman Marc
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School at Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gland Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):431-440. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.03.08.
Patient satisfaction and outcomes following reduction mammoplasty is important to measure, being a being a reconstructive procedure with physical and cosmetic benefits. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the various questionnaires that have been devised for this measurement. A systematic search of literature was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline and Scopus databases from 1966 to July 2018 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After application of pre-determined inclusion criteria by two authors, 95 articles were included. Data was extracted from included studies relating to demographics, surgical technique, questionnaires used and physical, psychological and aesthetic outcomes. Of the 95 studies included (9,716 patients), 58 studies (5,867 patients) reported on overall satisfaction with a mean rate of 90.26%. Researchers' own non-validated questionnaire was most commonly used in 52.6% of studies. Validated questionnaires used were most commonly the SF-36 (25.3%), Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) (9.5%) and BREAST-Q (8.4%). All showed improvement in physical and mental health. Our findings suggest that women who have undergone reduction mammoplasty for breast hypertrophy report postoperative satisfaction and improvement in quality of life. Of the validated questionnaires used, a combination of those assessing both mental, physical and psychosocial health as well as breast-specific surveys were most commonly used and may provide an accurate assessment of patient outcomes.
缩乳术后的患者满意度及治疗效果是重要的评估指标,因为这是一种兼具身体和美容益处的重建手术。本研究旨在评估患者满意度以及为此设计的各种调查问卷。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2018年7月在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Medline和Scopus数据库中对1966年以来的文献进行了系统检索。在两位作者应用预先确定的纳入标准后,共纳入95篇文章。从纳入研究中提取了与人口统计学、手术技术、使用的问卷以及身体、心理和美学结果相关的数据。在纳入的95项研究(9716例患者)中,58项研究(5867例患者)报告了总体满意度,平均满意率为90.26%。在52.6%的研究中最常使用研究者自己未经验证的问卷。最常使用的经过验证的问卷是SF-36(25.3%)、罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)(9.5%)和BREAST-Q(8.4%)。所有这些问卷均显示身心健康有所改善。我们的研究结果表明,因乳房肥大接受缩乳术的女性术后报告了满意度和生活质量的改善。在所使用的经过验证的问卷中,评估心理、身体和社会心理健康以及乳房特异性调查的问卷组合最常被使用,可能会对患者的治疗效果提供准确评估。