有症状盆腔器官脱垂的手术决策：循证方法
Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach.
作者信息
Jeon Myung Jae
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul Korea.
出版信息
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Sep;62(5):307-312. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.5.307. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Abstract
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and a variety of procedures can be performed to correct POP. When deciding on the proper surgical procedure, the surgeon must take into consideration the individual patient's risk for surgical complication and prolapse recurrence and her preference. This review will discuss the key issues faced in the surgical decision-making process for POP and recommendations based on the current scientific evidence.
摘要
手术是有症状的盆腔器官脱垂（POP）治疗的主要手段，可采用多种手术方法来矫正POP。在决定合适的手术方法时，外科医生必须考虑个体患者发生手术并发症和脱垂复发的风险以及她的偏好。本综述将讨论POP手术决策过程中面临的关键问题以及基于当前科学证据的建议。
相似文献
1
Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach.有症状盆腔器官脱垂的手术决策：循证方法
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Sep;62(5):307-312. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.5.307. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: how to choose the best approach.女性盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗：如何选择最佳方法。
J Med Liban. 2013 Jan-Mar;61(1):36-47. doi: 10.12816/0000399.
3
Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan;16(1):9-19. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ce959c.
4
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
5
Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?脱垂手术与阴道子宫托治疗症状性盆腔器官脱垂妇女：哪些因素影响治疗选择？
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):773-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
[Clinical study on concomitant surgery for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse].压力性尿失禁与盆腔器官脱垂同期手术的临床研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct 15;46(20):1533-5.
7
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
8
Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.盆腔器官脱垂手术后的解剖学结果：子宫保留与子宫切除术的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.机器人辅助经阴道骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂：单一大容量医疗机构的手术技术和结局。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.054. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
Associated pelvic organ prolapse in women with stress urinary incontinence: when to operate?压力性尿失禁女性合并盆腔器官脱垂：何时手术？
Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Nov;15(6):380-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000179760.45715.9b.
引用本文的文献
1
Smoking's Impact on 30-Day Complications in Mesh and Nonmesh Prolapse Surgery.吸烟对网状和非网状脱垂手术30天并发症的影响。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 Jun 1;31(6):597-603. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001658. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse: A Review.前阴道壁修补术和阴道旁修补术治疗前阴道壁膨出：综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 14;60(11):1865. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111865.
3
Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse.全国范围内腹腔镜顶端悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂时子宫托使用的实践差异评估。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 23;4(1):100322. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100322. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Lipoleiomyomas of the Uterine Cervix: A New Series including the First Recurrent Case and the First Systematic Literature Review.子宫颈脂肪平滑肌瘤：一个新的病例系列，包括首例复发病例及首次系统性文献综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 6;12(11):1852. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111852.
5
How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse.子宫脱垂患者应如何进行保留子宫的手术以及该手术适用于哪些患者。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Jul;65(4):317-324. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22003. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
6
Correlation between the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and the expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 of uterosacral ligament in uterine prolapse.子宫脱垂患者骶子宫韧带基质金属蛋白酶9表达与金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子-1表达的相关性
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Jan;65(1):46-51. doi: 10.5468/ogs.21156. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse: a single center retrospective study.阴道子宫切除术联合前后阴道壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效：一项单中心回顾性研究。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Jan;65(1):74-83. doi: 10.5468/ogs.21235. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
8
Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists.韩国妇产科医生在临床实践中对盆腔器官脱垂量化系统的使用现状。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 18;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01354-w.
9
Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair.阴道穹隆固有组织修复的最新进展。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2003-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04368-4. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
本文引用的文献
1
Association Between Concomitant Hysterectomy and Repeat Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in a Cohort of Nearly 100,000 Women.近 10 万名女性队列中子宫切除术与盆腔器官脱垂修复后再次手术的相关性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1328-1336. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002913.
2
Risk factors for the failure of iliococcygeus suspension for uterine prolapse.子宫脱垂行髂尾肌悬吊术失败的危险因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jun;225:210-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.Uterosacral 韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术联合或不联合围手术期行为疗法治疗盆腔器官阴道脱垂 5 年的手术结果和脱垂症状的影响：OPTIMAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
4
Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.子宫保留与子宫切除术在盆腔器官脱垂手术中的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析及临床实践指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):129-146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术治疗中子宫保留术与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
6
Obliterative Versus Reconstructive Prolapse Repair for Women Older than 70: Is There an Optimal Approach?70岁以上女性盆底脏器脱垂修复术：采用封闭性手术还是重建性手术？哪种方法最佳？
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):23-26. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000344.
7
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂女性的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 1;10(10):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.
8
Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?子宫阴道脱垂是否需要切除子宫来矫正？
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;28(5):435-40. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000307.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.传统腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss.阴道口大小与阴道顶端支持组织丧失相关，并可预测其发生。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):718.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.027. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
Zotero 插件