Suppr超能文献

成人门诊烧伤换药的镇静和镇痛:美国烧伤协会中心的调查。

Sedation and Analgesia for Adult Outpatient Burn Dressing Change: A Survey of American Burn Association Centers.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2020 Feb 19;41(2):322-327. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz164.

Abstract

The management of pain and sedation during burn dressing change is challenging. Previous reviews and studies have identified wide variability in such practices in hospitalized burn patients. This survey-based study aimed to determine the most commonly utilized sedation and analgesia practices in adult burn patients treated in the outpatient setting. The goal was to identify opportunities for improvement and to assist burn centers in optimizing sedation procedures. A 23-question survey was sent to members of the American Burn Association. Nonpharmacological interventions including music, television, games, and virtual reality were used by 68% of survey respondents. Eighty-one percent reported premedicating with oral opioids, 32% with intravenous opioids, and 45% with anxiolytics. Fifty-nine percentage of respondents indicated that the initial medication regimen for outpatient dressing changes consisted of the patient's existing oral pain medications. Forty-three percent indicated that there were no additional options if this regimen provided inadequate analgesia. Fifty-six percentage of respondents felt that pain during dressing change was adequately controlled 75% to 100% of the time, and 32% felt it was adequately controlled 50% to 75% of the time. Nitrous oxide was used by 8%. Anesthesia providers and an acute pain service are available in a minority of cases (13.7% and 28%, respectively) and are rarely consulted. Procedural burn pain remains significantly undertreated in the outpatient setting and the approach to treatment is variable among burn centers in the United States. Such variation likely represents an opportunity for identifying and implementing optimal practices and developing guidelines for burn pain management in the outpatient setting.

摘要

在烧伤换药过程中管理疼痛和镇静是具有挑战性的。之前的综述和研究已经确定了住院烧伤患者在这些实践中的广泛变异性。这项基于调查的研究旨在确定在门诊环境中治疗的成年烧伤患者最常用的镇静和镇痛实践。目的是确定改进的机会,并帮助烧伤中心优化镇静程序。向美国烧伤协会的成员发送了一份 23 个问题的调查问卷。包括音乐、电视、游戏和虚拟现实在内的非药物干预措施被 68%的调查对象使用。81%的人报告说使用口服阿片类药物进行预处理,32%使用静脉内阿片类药物,45%使用镇静剂。59%的受访者表示,门诊换药初始药物治疗方案包括患者现有的口服止痛药。如果该方案提供的镇痛不足,43%的人表示没有其他选择。56%的受访者认为换药过程中的疼痛有 75%至 100%的时间得到了充分控制,32%的人认为有 50%至 75%的时间得到了充分控制。8%的人使用了一氧化二氮。麻醉提供者和急性疼痛服务在少数情况下(分别为 13.7%和 28%)可用,很少咨询。在门诊环境中,程序性烧伤疼痛仍然明显治疗不足,而且美国烧伤中心的治疗方法也存在差异。这种差异可能代表着确定和实施最佳实践以及为门诊烧伤疼痛管理制定指南的机会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验