School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
J Burn Care Res. 2020 Feb 19;41(2):322-327. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz164.
The management of pain and sedation during burn dressing change is challenging. Previous reviews and studies have identified wide variability in such practices in hospitalized burn patients. This survey-based study aimed to determine the most commonly utilized sedation and analgesia practices in adult burn patients treated in the outpatient setting. The goal was to identify opportunities for improvement and to assist burn centers in optimizing sedation procedures. A 23-question survey was sent to members of the American Burn Association. Nonpharmacological interventions including music, television, games, and virtual reality were used by 68% of survey respondents. Eighty-one percent reported premedicating with oral opioids, 32% with intravenous opioids, and 45% with anxiolytics. Fifty-nine percentage of respondents indicated that the initial medication regimen for outpatient dressing changes consisted of the patient's existing oral pain medications. Forty-three percent indicated that there were no additional options if this regimen provided inadequate analgesia. Fifty-six percentage of respondents felt that pain during dressing change was adequately controlled 75% to 100% of the time, and 32% felt it was adequately controlled 50% to 75% of the time. Nitrous oxide was used by 8%. Anesthesia providers and an acute pain service are available in a minority of cases (13.7% and 28%, respectively) and are rarely consulted. Procedural burn pain remains significantly undertreated in the outpatient setting and the approach to treatment is variable among burn centers in the United States. Such variation likely represents an opportunity for identifying and implementing optimal practices and developing guidelines for burn pain management in the outpatient setting.
在烧伤换药过程中管理疼痛和镇静是具有挑战性的。之前的综述和研究已经确定了住院烧伤患者在这些实践中的广泛变异性。这项基于调查的研究旨在确定在门诊环境中治疗的成年烧伤患者最常用的镇静和镇痛实践。目的是确定改进的机会,并帮助烧伤中心优化镇静程序。向美国烧伤协会的成员发送了一份 23 个问题的调查问卷。包括音乐、电视、游戏和虚拟现实在内的非药物干预措施被 68%的调查对象使用。81%的人报告说使用口服阿片类药物进行预处理,32%使用静脉内阿片类药物,45%使用镇静剂。59%的受访者表示,门诊换药初始药物治疗方案包括患者现有的口服止痛药。如果该方案提供的镇痛不足,43%的人表示没有其他选择。56%的受访者认为换药过程中的疼痛有 75%至 100%的时间得到了充分控制,32%的人认为有 50%至 75%的时间得到了充分控制。8%的人使用了一氧化二氮。麻醉提供者和急性疼痛服务在少数情况下(分别为 13.7%和 28%)可用,很少咨询。在门诊环境中,程序性烧伤疼痛仍然明显治疗不足,而且美国烧伤中心的治疗方法也存在差异。这种差异可能代表着确定和实施最佳实践以及为门诊烧伤疼痛管理制定指南的机会。