• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨感觉和内感觉的时间序列辨别:我们真的能听到我们看到的吗?

Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3089-3098. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05654-4. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-019-05654-4
PMID:31541284
Abstract

Previous evidence suggests that people "hear" visual stimuli when encoding temporal information. This suggestion is based on the observation that auditory distractor information can strongly affect discrimination performance for visual temporal sequences. The present study aimed to replicate and extend this finding by investigating sequence discrimination within and across the two modalities. In two experimental series, participants judged whether two subsequently presented temporal sequences, a standard sequence followed by a comparison sequence, were identical or not. In Experimental Series A, irrelevant distractor information was presented simultaneously with the standard sequence. In Series B, the distraction appeared in the retention interval between the standard sequence and the comparison sequence. The results showed that auditory distraction impaired performance irrespective of whether the target sequences were auditory or visual, whereas visual distraction only impaired the discrimination of visual target sequences. Furthermore, auditory distraction was always at least as effective as visual distraction, irrespective of standard modality. Generally, discrimination performance was much better for auditory than for visual sequences. Overall, the present results are consistent with the idea that people code visual temporal information in the auditory modality. Moreover, the present study also suggests that such cross-modal interference effects should be interpreted cautiously with respect to their underlying timing mechanism because of the basic differences in temporal sensitivity between the two modalities.

摘要

先前的证据表明,人们在编码时间信息时“听到”视觉刺激。这一观点的依据是,听觉干扰信息会强烈影响视觉时间序列的辨别表现。本研究旨在通过研究两种模态内和模态间的序列辨别来复制和扩展这一发现。在两个实验系列中,参与者判断两个随后呈现的时间序列(标准序列后跟比较序列)是否相同。在实验系列 A 中,无关的干扰信息与标准序列同时呈现。在系列 B 中,干扰出现在标准序列和比较序列之间的保持间隔中。结果表明,听觉干扰会损害表现,无论目标序列是听觉还是视觉,而视觉干扰仅会损害视觉目标序列的辨别。此外,听觉干扰总是至少与视觉干扰一样有效,而不管标准模态如何。总体而言,听觉序列的辨别表现要好得多。总体而言,本研究结果与人们在听觉模式中对视觉时间信息进行编码的观点一致。此外,由于两种模态之间在时间敏感性方面存在基本差异,因此对于跨模态干扰效应的潜在时间机制,应谨慎解释此类干扰效应。

相似文献

1
Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?跨感觉和内感觉的时间序列辨别:我们真的能听到我们看到的吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3089-3098. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05654-4. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
2
Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.自动听觉和视觉时间感知的神经基础差异:跨模态延迟反应奇偶任务的 ERP 证据。
Brain Res. 2010 Apr 14;1325:100-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.040. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
3
Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.跨模态注意转换:时间辨别任务中的听觉优势
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
4
Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.听见眼睛之所见:视觉时间序列的听觉编码
Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):228-35. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00808.x.
5
Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.异常刺激的干扰:比较听觉和视觉异常刺激对听觉和视觉目标加工的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(1):54-65. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000273.
6
Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.听觉偏差引起的行为分心由声音的信息价值介导。来自听觉辨别任务的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):260-8. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000196.
7
The role of consolidation for perceptual learning in temporal discrimination within and across modalities.巩固在跨模态和模态内时间辨别中的感知学习作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
8
FMRI investigation of cross-modal interactions in beat perception: audition primes vision, but not vice versa.功能磁共振成像研究节拍感知中的跨模态相互作用:听觉启动视觉,但反之则不然。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1231-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.033. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
9
Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.基于自上而下特征的视听同步辨别匹配特征选择。
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Mar 15;433(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.031. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
10
See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.听见我所听?在听觉和视觉节奏中感知节拍。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3114-8. Epub 2012 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Processing of Short Time Intervals: Some Critical Issues.短时间间隔处理:一些关键问题。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:35-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_3.
2
The surprising role of stimulus modality in the dual-task introspective blind spot: a memory account.刺激模态在双任务内省盲点中的惊人作用:记忆解释。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1332-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01545-y. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Representations of temporal information in short-term memory: Are they modality-specific?短期记忆中时间信息的表征:它们是特定模态的吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Oct;170:163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
2
Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.在时长感知方面,听觉比视觉占主导地位,这与显著性、注意力和时间辨别能力无关。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1485-502. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0663-x.
3
Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.
跨模态时间间隔训练的快速转移
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1855-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3877-1. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
4
Multimodal integration of time.时间的多模态整合
Exp Psychol. 2014;61(4):310-22. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000249.
5
The role of consolidation for perceptual learning in temporal discrimination within and across modalities.巩固在跨模态和模态内时间辨别中的感知学习作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
Perceptual learning in temporal discrimination: asymmetric cross-modal transfer from audition to vision.时间辨别中的知觉学习:来自听觉到视觉的非对称跨模态转移。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;221(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3162-0. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
7
See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.听见我所听?在听觉和视觉节奏中感知节拍。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3114-8. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects.听觉和视觉持续时间的短期记忆:选择性干扰效应的证据。
Psychol Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):32-40. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0326-7. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
9
Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.初级听觉皮层在时间估计中的模态独立性作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):465-71. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2577-3. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Modality effects in rhythm processing: Auditory encoding of visual rhythms is neither obligatory nor automatic.节奏处理中的模态效应:视觉节奏的听觉编码既不是必需的,也不是自动的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1377-89. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1377.