Hotaling G T, Sugarman D B
Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Violence Vict. 1986 Summer;1(2):101-24.
The present review involves the evaluation of 97 potential risk markers of husband to wife violence. Using 52 case-comparison studies as the source of data, markers were divided into four categories: consistent risk, inconsistent risk, consistent nonrisk, and risk markers with insufficient data. Based on this classification, it appears that a number of widely held hypotheses about husband to wife violence have little empirical support. Only witnessing violence in the wife's family of origin was consistently associated with being victimized by violence. Furthermore, it seems that characteristics associated with either the husband-offender or the couple have greater utility for assessing the risk of husband to wife violence than characteristics of the wife-victim. Findings are discussed in terms of the methodological and theoretical implications of current research on this form of adult domestic violence.
本综述涉及对97个丈夫对妻子暴力的潜在风险标志物的评估。以52项病例对照研究作为数据来源,这些标志物被分为四类:一致风险、不一致风险、一致无风险以及数据不足的风险标志物。基于这种分类,似乎一些关于丈夫对妻子暴力的广泛假设几乎没有实证支持。只有在妻子的原生家庭中目睹暴力与遭受暴力侵害始终相关。此外,与丈夫施暴者或夫妻双方相关的特征,似乎比妻子受害者的特征在评估丈夫对妻子暴力风险方面更有用。将根据当前关于这种形式的成人家庭暴力研究的方法学和理论意义来讨论研究结果。