• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父权制与亲密伴侣暴力的关联:对幸存者庇护申请的应用。

Patriarchy's Link to Intimate Partner Violence: Applications to Survivors' Asylum Claims.

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

School of Social Work Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2023 Sep;29(11):1998-2021. doi: 10.1177/10778012221132299. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1177/10778012221132299
PMID:36349372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387730/
Abstract

Eligibility for asylum for survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) has recently been contested. We summarize social science evidence to show how such survivors generally meet asylum criteria. Studies consistently show a relationship between patriarchal factors and IPV, thereby establishing a key asylum criterion that women are being persecuted because of their status as women. Empirical support is also provided for other asylum criteria, specifically: patriarchal norms contribute to state actors' unwillingness to protect survivors, and survivors' political opinions are linked to an escalation of perpetrators' violence. The findings have implications for policy reform and supporting individual asylum-seekers.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)幸存者的庇护资格最近受到质疑。我们总结了社会科学证据,以表明此类幸存者通常如何符合庇护标准。研究一致表明,父权制因素与 IPV 之间存在关联,从而确立了一个关键的庇护标准,即女性因其女性身份而受到迫害。其他庇护标准也得到了实证支持,具体而言:父权制规范导致国家行为体不愿意保护幸存者,而幸存者的政治观点与施害者暴力升级有关。这些发现对政策改革和支持个别寻求庇护者具有影响。

相似文献

1
Patriarchy's Link to Intimate Partner Violence: Applications to Survivors' Asylum Claims.父权制与亲密伴侣暴力的关联:对幸存者庇护申请的应用。
Violence Against Women. 2023 Sep;29(11):1998-2021. doi: 10.1177/10778012221132299. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
The interplay between substance use and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-ethnography.物质使用与亲密伴侣暴力行为之间的相互作用:元民族志学研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Mar;65:8-23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Judicial Actors' Understanding of the Mental Health Impacts of Intimate Partner Violence: A Scoping Review.司法参与者对亲密伴侣暴力所造成的心理健康影响的理解:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):3164-3176. doi: 10.1177/15248380241244494. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Survivors' Social Construction of Intimate Partner Violence in Cebu City, Philippines.菲律宾宿务市亲密伴侣暴力幸存者的社会建构
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):NP9796-NP9818. doi: 10.1177/0886260519862267. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
Factors Associated With Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization in Asylum Seeking and Refugee Populations: A Systematic Review.寻求庇护者和难民群体中亲密伴侣暴力行为与受侵害情况的相关因素:一项系统综述
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jul;23(3):827-839. doi: 10.1177/1524838020977147. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Policy Roles in Promoting Affordable Housing for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.促进亲密伴侣暴力幸存者可负担住房政策角色
Violence Against Women. 2021 Jul;27(9):1317-1336. doi: 10.1177/1077801220913629. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
The potential role of network-oriented interventions for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence among asylum seekers in Belgium.面向网络的干预措施在比利时寻求庇护者中性暴力和基于性别的暴力幸存者身上的潜在作用。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10049-0.
8
Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Survivors' Help-Seeking.亲密伴侣暴力受害模式与幸存者的求助行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(21-22):4558-4582. doi: 10.1177/0886260517715027. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Keeping silent or running away. The voices of Vietnamese women survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.保持沉默或逃避:亲密伴侣暴力越南女性幸存者的声音。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1863128. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1863128.
10
The Association Between Social Support and Stages of Change in Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.亲密关系暴力幸存者的社会支持与改变阶段之间的关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Apr;33(7):1051-1070. doi: 10.1177/0886260515614282. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of spousal educational disparities on intimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women: a study of 30 countries.配偶教育差异对针对孕妇的亲密伴侣暴力行为的影响:一项对30个国家的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84867-2.
2
Hybrid Interpersonal Violence in Latin America: Patterns and Causes.拉丁美洲的混合型人际暴力:模式与成因
Annu Rev Criminol. 2024 Jan;7:163-186. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-014603.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Barriers to Formal Help Seeking for Adult Survivors of IPV in the United States, 2005-2019.2005-2019 年美国针对 IPV 成年幸存者寻求正式帮助的障碍的系统综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Dec;22(5):1279-1295. doi: 10.1177/1524838020916254. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Future Directions in Intimate Partner Violence Research: An Intersectionality Framework for Analyzing Women's Processes of Leaving Abusive Relationships.亲密伴侣暴力研究的未来方向:分析女性离开虐待关系过程的交叉性框架。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP12600-NP12625. doi: 10.1177/0886260519900939. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
3
Spousal Violence Against Women in India: A Social-Ecological Analysis Using Data From the National Family Health Survey 2015 to 2016.印度针对妇女的配偶暴力行为:基于2015年至2016年全国家庭健康调查数据的社会生态分析
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10147-10181. doi: 10.1177/0886260519881530. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Intimate partner violence against women in Nigeria: a multilevel study investigating the effect of women's status and community norms.尼日利亚针对女性的亲密伴侣暴力行为:一项调查女性地位和社区规范影响的多层次研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 9;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0628-7.
5
Men's Perpetration of Partner Violence in Bangladesh: Community Gender Norms and Violence in Childhood.孟加拉国男性对伴侣的暴力行为:社区性别规范与童年时期的暴力经历
Psychol Men Masc. 2018 Jan;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1037/men0000069. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
6
Women's Work, Gender Roles, and Intimate Partner Violence in Nigeria.尼日利亚的女性工作、性别角色与亲密伴侣暴力
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Oct;46(7):1923-1938. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1023-4. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
How do area-level socioeconomic status and gender norms affect partner violence against women? Evidence from Tanzania.地区层面的社会经济地位和性别规范如何影响针对妇女的伴侣暴力?来自坦桑尼亚的证据。
Int J Public Health. 2016 Nov;61(8):971-980. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0876-y. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Acceptability of Partner Violence in 51 Societies: The Role of Sexism and Attitudes Toward Violence in Social Relationships.51个社会中伴侣暴力的可接受性:性别歧视和对社会关系中暴力态度的作用。
Violence Against Women. 2017 Mar;23(3):351-367. doi: 10.1177/1077801216642870. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
9
A First Look at Gender Inequality as a Societal Risk Factor for Dating Violence.初次审视性别不平等作为约会暴力的社会风险因素
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.017.
10
Risk factors for men's lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: results from the international men and gender equality survey (IMAGES) in eight countries.男性一生中对亲密伴侣实施身体暴力的风险因素:来自八个国家的国际男性与性别平等调查(IMAGES)结果
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0118639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118639. eCollection 2015.