Suppr超能文献

随机分组情况:其他随机分组方式。

Randomization Among: The Other Randomization.

作者信息

Barnbaum Deborah R

机构信息

Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Kent State University.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Sep;41(5):35-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500031.

Abstract

A valid informed consent process for a randomized controlled trial requires the disclosure to potential participants that they will be randomized to receive the study intervention or a control intervention. This is a case of randomization within a trial, a type of randomization that has received significant attention in research ethics. When institutions recruit large numbers of research participants for multisite clinical trials, a different, hidden form of randomization may occur: randomization among clinical trials. If it is essential to disclose to potential participants randomization within a clinical trial, then it may be the case that randomization among clinical trials recruiting individuals from the same cohort of eligible participants should also be disclosed. This article examines how randomization among clinical trials might take place and the ethical issues such randomization raises about informed consent to research participation.

摘要

一项随机对照试验的有效知情同意程序要求向潜在参与者披露他们将被随机分配接受研究干预或对照干预。这是试验中的随机化情况,这种随机化类型在研究伦理中受到了极大关注。当机构为多中心临床试验招募大量研究参与者时,可能会出现另一种不同的、隐蔽的随机化形式:临床试验之间的随机化。如果向潜在参与者披露临床试验内的随机化至关重要,那么对于从同一合格参与者队列中招募个体的临床试验之间的随机化,或许也应该进行披露。本文探讨了临床试验之间的随机化可能如何发生,以及这种随机化在研究参与知情同意方面引发的伦理问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验