• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The ethics of cluster-randomized trials requires further evaluation: a refinement of the Ottawa Statement.群组随机试验的伦理学需要进一步评估:渥太华声明的改进。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
2
Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trial.在资源匮乏环境下开展的整群随机试验引发的伦理问题:通过对 PURE 马拉维试验的分析来确定这些问题的差距。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;45(6):388-393. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105374. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
The Ottawa Statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomised trials: precis for researchers and research ethics committees.《渥太华关于整群随机试验伦理设计与实施的声明》:面向研究人员和研究伦理委员会的摘要
BMJ. 2013 May 9;346:f2838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2838.
4
Cluster-randomized trials: A closer look.整群随机试验:深入探讨。
Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):294-300. doi: 10.1177/1740774516629405. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
5
Survey of consent practices in cluster randomized trials: improvements are needed in ethical conduct and reporting.整群随机试验中同意做法的调查:伦理行为和报告方面需要改进。
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):60-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774513513658. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers.清晰思考 FIRST 试验:解决涉及卫生提供者的政策干预措施的群组随机试验中的伦理挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):593-598. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104282. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
The Ottawa Statement implementation guidance document for cluster randomized trials in the hemodialysis setting.《渥太华声明》在血液透析环境下进行整群随机试验的实施指南文件。
Kidney Int. 2024 May;105(5):898-911. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.03.001.
8
Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.阶梯楔形整群随机试验的伦理行为及报告存在不足:一项系统评价的结果
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):333-341. doi: 10.1177/1740774517703057. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries.整群随机试验的研究伦理审查中的差异:三个国家基于情景的调查
Trials. 2014 Feb 5;15:48. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-48.
10
The moral and legal status of Health Care Workers in Cluster Randomized Trials: a response to Weijer and Taljaard.《关于整群随机临床试验中卫生保健工作者的道德和法律地位:对 Weijer 和 Taljaard 的回应》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in the Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials: a citation analysis reveals a need for updated ethics guidelines.《渥太华集群随机试验伦理设计与实施声明》中的差距:一项引文分析表明需要更新伦理准则。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2025 Jun 18;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41073-025-00166-y.
2
Integrated management of atrial fibrillation in primary care: results of the ALL-IN cluster randomized trial.基层医疗中房颤的综合管理:ALL-IN整群随机试验的结果
Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 7;41(30):2836-2844. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa055.
3
Integrated management of atrial fibrillation including tailoring of anticoagulation in primary care: study design of the ALL-IN cluster randomised trial.心房颤动的综合管理,包括基层医疗中抗凝治疗的个体化:ALL-IN整群随机试验的研究设计
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e015510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015510.
4
Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.群组随机试验近期方法学进展综述:第2部分——分析
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jul;107(7):1078-1086. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303707. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Effect of waivers of consent on recruitment in acute stroke trials: A systematic review.同意书豁免对急性中风试验招募情况的影响:一项系统评价。
Neurology. 2016 Apr 19;86(16):1543-51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002587. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
The need to balance merits and limitations from different disciplines when considering the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.在考虑阶梯楔形整群随机试验设计时,平衡不同学科的优点和局限性的必要性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Oct 30;15:93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0090-2.
7
Ethical responsibilities toward indirect and collateral participants in pragmatic clinical trials.对务实临床试验中间接和附带参与者的伦理责任。
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):476-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597698. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

群组随机试验的伦理学需要进一步评估:渥太华声明的改进。

The ethics of cluster-randomized trials requires further evaluation: a refinement of the Ottawa Statement.

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, PO Box 85500, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, PO Box 85500, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.013
PMID:25910909
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Ottawa Statement is the first guidance document for the ethical and scientific conduct of cluster-randomized trials (CRTs). However, not all recommendations are straightforward to implement. In this paper we will reflect in particular on the recommendation on identifying human research subjects and the issue to what extent the randomization process should be disclosed if there is a risk of contamination.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The Ottawa Statement was thoroughly evaluated within a multidisciplinary research team, consisting amongst others of epidemiologists and ethicists.

RESULTS

Patients in a CRT may also be considered as research subjects if they are indirectly affected by the studied interventions in a CRT. Second, health care workers are research subjects in CRTs but have a different moral status compared with ordinary research participants. This different status has implications for withdrawal and the choice of the primary objective. Third, modified informed consent for CRTs may be obtained when researchers can demonstrate that disclosure of the randomization process would affect the validity of a CRT.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations of the Ottawa Statement on identifying the research subject and providing informed consent can and should be refined.

摘要

目的

渥太华声明是首个关于群组随机试验(CRT)的伦理和科学实施的指导文件。然而,并非所有建议都易于实施。在本文中,我们将特别反思关于确定人类研究对象的建议,以及在存在污染风险的情况下,随机化过程应在何种程度上披露的问题。

研究设计和设置

渥太华声明在一个多学科研究团队中进行了彻底评估,该团队成员包括流行病学家和伦理学家等。

结果

如果 CRT 中研究的干预措施间接地影响到患者,那么患者也可以被视为 CRT 的研究对象。其次,在 CRT 中,卫生保健工作者也是研究对象,但与普通研究参与者的道德地位不同。这种不同的地位对退出和主要目标的选择有影响。第三,当研究人员能够证明披露随机化过程会影响 CRT 的有效性时,可以获得 CRT 的修改后知情同意书。

结论

渥太华声明中关于确定研究对象和提供知情同意的建议可以并且应该得到改进。