Sugarman D B, Cohn E S
Rhode Island College, Providence.
Violence Vict. 1986 Winter;1(4):291-303.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of sex differences and seriousness of the abuse situation on observers' attributions of responsibility for origin and solution to both partners in a couple. Male and female undergraduate students (N = 354) read a vignette about a wife abuse incident. The results supported the victim activation hypothesis, with wives being held more responsible for the solution than for the origin of the problem. In contrast, husbands were held more responsible for the origin than for the solution to the problem. Overall, there were sex differences for attributions of responsibility to the husband but not for those to the wife. Women were more likely than men to attribute origin and solution responsibility to the husband. There was no clear support for the effects of the seriousness of the abuse situation. Husbands were attributed more control over the problem's solution than were wives.
本研究的目的是确定性别差异和虐待情况的严重程度对观察者对夫妻双方问题起源和解决责任归属的影响。男女本科生(N = 354)阅读了一篇关于妻子受虐事件的短文。结果支持了受害者激活假说,即妻子在问题解决方面比在问题起源方面被认为应承担更多责任。相比之下,丈夫在问题起源方面比在问题解决方面被认为应承担更多责任。总体而言,在对丈夫的责任归属上存在性别差异,而对妻子的责任归属则不存在性别差异。女性比男性更倾向于将问题起源和解决责任归咎于丈夫。没有明确证据支持虐待情况严重程度的影响。与妻子相比,丈夫在问题解决上被认为有更多控制权。