• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decision support intervention (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning: protocol for a randomised trial.决策支持干预(《计划周全指南》),供患者及其替代决策人使用,以提高参与预先护理计划的程度:一项随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e027897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027897.
2
Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning.一项针对严重疾病决策辅助工具(Plan Well Guide)的随机试验,旨在提高患者及其替代决策人的参与度,以改善预先护理计划。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Mar;12(1):99-106. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003040. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对患有严重慢性病的老年退伍军人的预先护理计划PREPARE研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Dec 12;16:570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1055-9.
4
Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.透析中的预先护理计划与临终决策:一项针对患者及其代理人的随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):813-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers.照顾计划意向调查工具在代理人决策中的调整与初步验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):980-988.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Improving advance care planning for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking older adults: study protocol for the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.改善英语和西班牙语老年人群的预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 11;6(7):e011705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011705.
7
A randomized, controlled trial to improve advance care planning among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.一项旨在改善心脏手术患者预先医疗计划的随机对照试验。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):1049-53. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178192.10283.b4.
8
Advance care planning in patients with incurable cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.晚期癌症患者的预先护理计划:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e012387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012387.
9
Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention.在一般实践环境中为患有慢性、生命有限疾病的患者促进预先护理计划:一项 III 期群组随机对照试验的方案和 ACP-GP 干预的过程评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jun 25;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1.
10
Improving a Full Range of Advance Care Planning Behavior Change and Action Domains: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.改善全方位的预先医疗照护计划行为改变和行动领域:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):575-581.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a French adaptation of a community-based advance serious illness planning decision aid.一项基于社区的晚期严重疾病规划决策辅助工具的法语改编版评估。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 19;3:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100182. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning.一项针对严重疾病决策辅助工具(Plan Well Guide)的随机试验,旨在提高患者及其替代决策人的参与度,以改善预先护理计划。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Mar;12(1):99-106. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003040. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Advance care planning; we need to do it more, but it needs to be done differently.预先护理计划;我们需要更多地开展这项工作,但方式需要有所不同。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 18;19:100245. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.100245. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers.照顾计划意向调查工具在代理人决策中的调整与初步验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):980-988.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
3
The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.支撑癌症患者预先医疗照护计划的概念模型和作用机制:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;33(1):5-23. doi: 10.1177/0269216318809582. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
4
Canadians' Views on Palliative Care.加拿大人对姑息治疗的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(S1):S9-S14. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0387.
5
Recognizing difficult trade-offs: values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care in a multi-site survey of adult patients in family practices.认识艰难的权衡取舍:家庭实践中多站点成年患者终末关怀的价值观和治疗偏好调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0570-x.
6
Association of Racial Differences With End-of-Life Care Quality in the United States.美国种族差异与临终关怀质量的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1858-1860. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4793.
7
Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey.患者对终末期关怀的价值观和治疗偏好之间的差异:一项多中心调查的结果。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):292-299. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001056. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
How Often Is End-of-Life Care in the United States Inconsistent with Patients' Goals of Care?在美国,临终关怀与患者的护理目标不一致的情况有多频繁?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;20(12):1400-1404. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0065. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
10
The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测重症患者死亡的“意外问题”:系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775.

决策支持干预(《计划周全指南》),供患者及其替代决策人使用,以提高参与预先护理计划的程度:一项随机试验的方案。

Decision support intervention (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning: protocol for a randomised trial.

机构信息

Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e027897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027897.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027897
PMID:31542737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6756453/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomised trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a decision support intervention for serious illness decisions (the Plan Well Guide decision aid; www.PlanWellguide.com) in increasing the engagement of substitute decision-makers (SDMs) in the patient's advance care planning process (ie, 'ACP engagement'), specifically the SDM's confidence and readiness for the role in the future.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. We aim to enrol 90 participant dyads: patients aged 65 years and older attending outpatient healthcare settings and with indicators they would be at high risk of needing future medical decisions and their SDM. The intervention is the Plan Well Guide decision aid, administered to the patient by a facilitator, with the SDM present. The primary endpoint is change after 3 months in the SDM's ACP engagement using a validated measure of behavioural change (SDM's knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness) to enact the role. The secondary endpoints are (1) ACP engagement of the patient measured by a validated survey; (2) change in SDM decisional conflict regarding involvement in future decision-making and (3) postintervention patient decisional conflict regarding preference for life-sustaining treatments. Primary and secondary continuous outcomes will be analysed using the linear regression. The mean difference and 95% CIs will be reported.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was received August 2017 (2017-3714-GRA) from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. We plan to disseminate trial results in peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and via our web-based knowledge translation platforms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03239639; Pre-results.

摘要

目的

本随机试验的目的是评估一项针对重病决策的决策支持干预措施(即 Plan Well Guide 决策辅助工具;www.PlanWellguide.com)的疗效,以增加替代决策者(SDM)参与患者的预先护理计划过程(即“ACP 参与”),特别是 SDM 对未来角色的信心和准备情况。

方法和分析

本研究是一项平行组随机对照试验。我们旨在招募 90 对参与者:年龄在 65 岁及以上的门诊医疗保健环境中的患者,以及有迹象表明他们将来可能需要进行医疗决策的患者及其 SDM。干预措施是 Plan Well Guide 决策辅助工具,由一名协调员在 SDM 在场的情况下为患者提供。主要终点是在 3 个月后,使用经过验证的行为改变测量方法(SDM 的知识、思考、自我效能和准备)来衡量 SDM 的 ACP 参与度的变化,以实施该角色。次要终点是(1)通过经过验证的调查衡量患者的 ACP 参与度;(2)SDM 对未来决策参与的决策冲突的变化;(3)干预后患者对维持生命治疗的偏好的决策冲突。主要和次要连续结果将使用线性回归进行分析。将报告平均值差异和 95%置信区间。

伦理和传播

2017 年 8 月获得汉密尔顿综合研究伦理委员会的批准(2017-3714-GRA)。我们计划在同行评议的期刊、国家和国际会议以及我们的基于网络的知识转化平台上发布试验结果。

试验注册号

NCT03239639;预结果。