Suppr超能文献

了解农田地区与鼠患爆发相关的保护冲突。

Understanding conservation conflicts associated with rodent outbreaks in farmland areas.

作者信息

Lauret Valentin, Delibes-Mateos Miguel, Mougeot François, Arroyo-Lopez Beatriz

机构信息

CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1122-1133. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01256-0. Epub 2019 Sep 21.

Abstract

Rodent outbreaks affect many farmland areas worldwide and the negative environmental impacts of control campaigns cause intense social tensions. In such conservation conflicts, understanding stakeholders' viewpoints is critical to promote ecologically sustainable management. We used Q-methodology, a framework standing between qualitative and quantitative social research, to investigate human subjectivity and understand conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks in Spain. We interviewed farmers, conservationists, hunters, and governmental agencies, and identified five main discourses about the origins and consequences of the conflictive situation. Finding sustainable management is impaired by opposing views about causes and consequences of vole outbreaks and their management, which are at the root of the conflict. Social tensions will likely remain until the underlying conflicts between people holding different views are also managed. Decision-making should therefore focus on mitigating underlying conflicts. Using trained independent mediators would help the effective resolution of conservation conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks and their management.

摘要

鼠患在全球许多农田地区爆发,灭鼠行动对环境造成的负面影响引发了严重的社会紧张局势。在这类保护冲突中,了解利益相关者的观点对于推动生态可持续管理至关重要。我们运用Q方法(一种介于定性和定量社会研究之间的框架)来调查人类的主观性,并了解西班牙鼠患爆发所引发的冲突。我们采访了农民、环保主义者、猎人以及政府机构,确定了关于冲突局势的起因和后果的五种主要话语。由于对田鼠爆发的原因、后果及其管理存在对立观点,而这些观点正是冲突的根源,所以寻找可持续管理受到了阻碍。在持有不同观点的人们之间的潜在冲突得到解决之前,社会紧张局势可能会持续存在。因此,决策应侧重于缓解潜在冲突。使用经过培训的独立调解人将有助于有效解决由鼠患爆发及其管理引发的保护冲突。

相似文献

5
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts.理解和管理保护冲突。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;28(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
7
The place of nature in conservation conflicts.自然在保护冲突中的地位。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):795-802. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13485. Epub 2020 May 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Irruptive mammal host populations shape tularemia epidemiology.爆发性哺乳动物宿主种群塑造了兔热病的流行病学特征。
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Nov 16;13(11):e1006622. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006622. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
Don't forget to look down - collaborative approaches to predator conservation.别忘了往下看——保护捕食者的协作方法。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Nov;92(4):2157-2163. doi: 10.1111/brv.12326. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.将社会科学纳入保护工作的主流。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Feb;31(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12788. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验