Lauret Valentin, Delibes-Mateos Miguel, Mougeot François, Arroyo-Lopez Beatriz
CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1122-1133. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01256-0. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
Rodent outbreaks affect many farmland areas worldwide and the negative environmental impacts of control campaigns cause intense social tensions. In such conservation conflicts, understanding stakeholders' viewpoints is critical to promote ecologically sustainable management. We used Q-methodology, a framework standing between qualitative and quantitative social research, to investigate human subjectivity and understand conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks in Spain. We interviewed farmers, conservationists, hunters, and governmental agencies, and identified five main discourses about the origins and consequences of the conflictive situation. Finding sustainable management is impaired by opposing views about causes and consequences of vole outbreaks and their management, which are at the root of the conflict. Social tensions will likely remain until the underlying conflicts between people holding different views are also managed. Decision-making should therefore focus on mitigating underlying conflicts. Using trained independent mediators would help the effective resolution of conservation conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks and their management.
鼠患在全球许多农田地区爆发,灭鼠行动对环境造成的负面影响引发了严重的社会紧张局势。在这类保护冲突中,了解利益相关者的观点对于推动生态可持续管理至关重要。我们运用Q方法(一种介于定性和定量社会研究之间的框架)来调查人类的主观性,并了解西班牙鼠患爆发所引发的冲突。我们采访了农民、环保主义者、猎人以及政府机构,确定了关于冲突局势的起因和后果的五种主要话语。由于对田鼠爆发的原因、后果及其管理存在对立观点,而这些观点正是冲突的根源,所以寻找可持续管理受到了阻碍。在持有不同观点的人们之间的潜在冲突得到解决之前,社会紧张局势可能会持续存在。因此,决策应侧重于缓解潜在冲突。使用经过培训的独立调解人将有助于有效解决由鼠患爆发及其管理引发的保护冲突。