• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲脊椎动物对农作物的破坏:现有知识和潜在的未来管理方向。

Crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America: current knowledge and potential future management directions.

机构信息

Ecology Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Ecology and Conservation of Amazonian Vertebrates Research Group, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Mar 25;10:e13185. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13185. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.13185
PMID:35356474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8958972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crop farming contributes to one of the most extensive land use activities in the world, and cropland areas continue to rise. Many vertebrate species feed on crops, which has caused an increase in human-wildlife conflicts in croplands. Crop-feeding damages the economy of local communities and causes retaliation against the responsible vertebrates in several forms, including lethal practices such as hunting and poisoning. Lethal control may cause the local extirpation of some species, affecting ecological processes and patterns. Therefore, it is necessary to find non-lethal alternatives that can protect both local economies and wildlife. Research has been conducted in Africa and Asia, focusing on elephants and primates, and the effectiveness of some non-lethal alternatives, such as chili-based repellents and beehives, is being investigated. However, there has been very little research on this topic in Central and South America. The goal of this review is to assess the current knowledge on crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America and indicate future research directions.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

We reviewed the available scientific literature reporting crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America, and the Caribbean, published between 1980 and 2020, through systematic searches on Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We analyzed the temporal and geographical distributions of the studies, the crops and vertebrate species these studies considered, the crop protection techniques used, and their effectiveness.

RESULTS

We retrieved only 113 studies on crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America, but there was an increasing trend in the number of studies published over time. Most of the studies were conducted in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica. Four orders of mammals (Rodentia, Carnivora, Artiodactyla, and Primates) and four orders of birds (Passeriformes, Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, and Anseriformes) were the most common groups of crop-feeding vertebrates. The most prominent crop was corn, which was featured in 49% of the studies. Other notable crops include rice, sorghum, and sugarcane. The most reported method for protecting crops was lethal control through hunting or poisoning. Non-lethal techniques were found to be less prevalent. Less than half of the studies that mentioned the use of protection techniques indicated their effectiveness, and only 10 studies evaluated it by performing scientific experiments and reporting their results.

CONCLUSIONS

Central and South America is still underrepresented in research on vertebrate crop-feeding. There is a need for experimentation-based robust research to find crop protection techniques that minimize harm to vertebrates while effectively reducing damage to crops. While this is being studied, habitat loss and fragmentation need to be halted to prevent the native vertebrates from turning to crops for food.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/745224eb25ae/peerj-10-13185-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/4f473fb409c1/peerj-10-13185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/6f1d9a9afcdf/peerj-10-13185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/b9bdebfbaec3/peerj-10-13185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/59ed744db89a/peerj-10-13185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/90f45271b0ba/peerj-10-13185-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/745224eb25ae/peerj-10-13185-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/4f473fb409c1/peerj-10-13185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/6f1d9a9afcdf/peerj-10-13185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/b9bdebfbaec3/peerj-10-13185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/59ed744db89a/peerj-10-13185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/90f45271b0ba/peerj-10-13185-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15b7/8958972/745224eb25ae/peerj-10-13185-g006.jpg
摘要

背景

农作物种植是世界上最广泛的土地利用活动之一,耕地面积持续增加。许多脊椎动物以农作物为食,这导致了农田中人与野生动物冲突的增加。农作物受损会损害当地社区的经济,并以多种形式对负责的脊椎动物进行报复,包括狩猎和下毒等致命行为。致命控制可能导致一些物种在当地灭绝,影响生态过程和模式。因此,有必要寻找既能保护当地经济又能保护野生动物的非致命替代品。非洲和亚洲已经进行了相关研究,重点是大象和灵长类动物,并且正在研究一些非致命替代品的有效性,例如基于辣椒的驱虫剂和蜂巢。然而,中美洲和南美洲在这方面的研究非常少。本综述的目的是评估中美洲和南美洲脊椎动物对农作物造成损害的现有知识,并指出未来的研究方向。

调查方法

我们通过在 Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 上进行系统搜索,审查了 1980 年至 2020 年间发表的关于中美洲和南美洲及加勒比地区脊椎动物对农作物造成损害的现有科学文献,分析了研究的时间和地理分布、研究中考虑的农作物和脊椎动物物种、使用的农作物保护技术及其有效性。

结果

我们仅检索到 113 篇关于拉丁美洲脊椎动物对农作物造成损害的研究,但随着时间的推移,发表的研究数量呈上升趋势。大多数研究是在巴西、阿根廷、墨西哥和哥斯达黎加进行的。哺乳动物的四个目(啮齿目、食肉目、偶蹄目和灵长目)和鸟类的四个目(雀形目、鸠鸽目、鹦鹉目和雁形目)是最常见的农作物食草脊椎动物群体。最突出的作物是玉米,占研究的 49%。其他值得注意的作物包括水稻、高粱和甘蔗。最常报道的保护作物的方法是通过狩猎或下毒进行致命控制。非致命技术的报道较少。提到使用保护技术的研究中,不到一半表明其有效性,只有 10 项研究通过进行科学实验和报告结果来评估其有效性。

结论

中美洲和南美洲在脊椎动物对农作物的食性研究方面仍然代表性不足。需要进行基于实验的稳健研究,以找到既能最大限度地减少对脊椎动物的伤害,又能有效减少对农作物损害的作物保护技术。在进行这项研究的同时,需要停止栖息地的丧失和破碎化,以防止本地脊椎动物转向农作物作为食物。

相似文献

1
Crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America: current knowledge and potential future management directions.拉丁美洲脊椎动物对农作物的破坏:现有知识和潜在的未来管理方向。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 25;10:e13185. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13185. eCollection 2022.
2
Use of wild vertebrates for consumption and bushmeat trade in Brazil: a review.巴西野生脊椎动物的食用和狩猎贸易:综述。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023 Dec 19;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00628-x.
3
Wildlife uses and hunting patterns in rural communities of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.墨西哥尤卡坦半岛农村社区的野生动物利用和狩猎模式。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Oct 2;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-38.
4
From forest to farm: systematic review of cultivar feeding by chimpanzees--management implications for wildlife in anthropogenic landscapes.从森林到农田:黑猩猩对栽培品种的取食:人为景观中野生动物管理的启示
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033391. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
5
Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America.拉丁美洲的农民狩猎与保护。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Apr;34(2):338-353. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13396. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Spatio-temporal patterns of human-wildlife conflicts and effectiveness of mitigation in Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal.尼泊尔舒克拉范塔国家公园的人兽冲突时空格局及缓解措施的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 17;18(4):e0282654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282654. eCollection 2023.
7
Agriculture and herbivorous waterfowl: a review of the scientific basis for improved management.农业与食草水禽:改善管理的科学依据综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):854-877. doi: 10.1111/brv.12258. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Review of anthraquinone applications for pest management and agricultural crop protection.蒽醌在害虫管理和农作物保护中的应用综述。
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Oct;72(10):1813-25. doi: 10.1002/ps.4330. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
[Attitudes toward the environment: a North / South analysis].[对环境的态度:南北分析]
Tiers Monde. 1992 Apr-Jun;33(130):355-72.
10
[Wildlife damage mitigation in agricultural crops in a Bolivian montane forest].[玻利维亚山地森林农作物中野生动物损害的缓解措施]
Rev Biol Trop. 2014 Dec;62(4):1495-507.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of land use change on mycorrhizal fungi and their associations with rodents: insights from a temperate forest in Mexico.土地利用变化对菌根真菌及其与啮齿动物关联的影响:来自墨西哥一片温带森林的见解
Mycorrhiza. 2025 May 8;35(3):36. doi: 10.1007/s00572-025-01210-x.
2
Patterns of primates crop foraging and the impacts on incomes of smallholders across the mosaic agricultural landscape of Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚沃莱塔地区镶嵌式农业景观中小农户的灵长类作物觅食模式及其对收入的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313831. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Satellites document rapid expansion of cropland.卫星记录了农田的迅速扩张。
Science. 2022 Jan 7;375(6576):12. doi: 10.1126/science.acz9930. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
The global impact of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) on terrestrial biodiversity.野猪(Sus scrofa)对陆地生物多样性的全球影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92691-1.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
A meta-analysis contrasting active versus passive restoration practices in dryland agricultural ecosystems.一项对比旱地农业生态系统中主动恢复与被动恢复措施的荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2020 Nov 23;8:e10428. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10428. eCollection 2020.
5
A systematic review of the direct and indirect effects of herbivory on plant reproduction mediated by pollination.一项关于食草作用通过授粉介导对植物繁殖的直接和间接影响的系统综述。
PeerJ. 2020 Jun 8;8:e9049. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9049. eCollection 2020.
6
Understanding conservation conflicts associated with rodent outbreaks in farmland areas.了解农田地区与鼠患爆发相关的保护冲突。
Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1122-1133. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01256-0. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
7
Ecological and Behavioural Flexibility of Mantled Howlers (Alouatta palliata) in Response to Anthropogenic Habitat Disturbance.长毛吼猴(Alouatta palliata)对人为栖息地干扰的生态与行为适应性
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2019;90(6):456-469. doi: 10.1159/000499825. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
8
Key determinants of global land-use projections.全球土地利用预测的关键决定因素。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 15;10(1):2166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w.
9
The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops.主要粮食作物的病原体和害虫的全球负担。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar;3(3):430-439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Competition during sugarcane crop raiding by blond capuchin monkeys (Sapajus flavius).金毛卷尾猴(Sapajus flavius)在甘蔗作物掠夺期间的竞争。
Primates. 2019 Jan;60(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s10329-018-0698-z. Epub 2018 Nov 21.