Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Surgery. 2020 Jan;167(1):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.034. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed using a transabdominal or posterior retroperitoneal approach. Choosing the optimal approach can be challenging.
Using data from the Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (2014-2018), baseline patient characteristics and outcomes were compared with bivariate methods; univariate and multivariate analyses were used to estimate the association between operative approach and complication risk.
Among 833 patients, 35.3% underwent posterior retroperitoneal. Median age was 54 years. Patients undergoing posterior retroperitoneal had lesser rates of body mass index >40 (9.2% vs 17.4%, P = .001), smaller nodules (median 2.4 vs 3.2 cm, P < .001), and more commonly right-sided nodules (46.6% vs 36.9%, P = .02). Posterior retroperitoneal was associated with a lesser rate of conversion to an open procedure (0.7% vs 4.1%, P = .004), less complications (3.1% vs 8.7%, P = .002), and shorter hospital stay (≤48 h: 92.2% vs 76.6%, P < .001), but a greater rate of capsular disruption (12.6% vs 7.6%, P = .02). For posterior retroperitoneal cases with capsular disruption, median nodule size was 2.2 cm, and 16.2% were metastatic tumors. After multivariate adjustment, posterior retroperitoneal was 2.2 times as likely to result in capsular disruption as transabdominal (95% confidence interval, 1.04-4.79, P = .04).
This study revealed a greater rate for capsular disruption during posterior retroperitoneal even for small tumors. Our findings from the Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (2014-2018) suggests that posterior retroperitoneal should be used selectively, especially when a malignancy is suspected.
腹腔镜肾上腺切除术可通过经腹腔或后腹膜后入路进行。选择最佳入路具有挑战性。
使用协作内分泌手术质量改进计划(2014-2018 年)的数据,采用双变量方法比较基线患者特征和结局;采用单变量和多变量分析估计手术入路与并发症风险之间的关联。
在 833 例患者中,35.3%行后腹膜后入路。中位年龄为 54 岁。后腹膜后入路患者的体质量指数>40 的发生率较低(9.2% vs. 17.4%,P=0.001),结节较小(中位数 2.4 厘米 vs. 3.2 厘米,P<0.001),右侧结节更为常见(46.6% vs. 36.9%,P=0.02)。后腹膜后入路与中转开放手术的发生率较低(0.7% vs. 4.1%,P=0.004)、并发症发生率较低(3.1% vs. 8.7%,P=0.002)和住院时间较短(≤48 小时:92.2% vs. 76.6%,P<0.001)相关,但包膜破裂发生率较高(12.6% vs. 7.6%,P=0.02)。对于后腹膜后入路伴包膜破裂的病例,结节大小中位数为 2.2 厘米,16.2%为转移性肿瘤。多变量调整后,后腹膜后入路发生包膜破裂的风险是经腹腔入路的 2.2 倍(95%置信区间,1.04-4.79,P=0.04)。
本研究显示后腹膜后入路即使对于小肿瘤也有更高的包膜破裂率。我们从协作内分泌手术质量改进计划(2014-2018 年)获得的研究结果表明,后腹膜后入路应选择性使用,特别是怀疑恶性肿瘤时。