• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助后腹腔镜单孔入路肾上腺切除术:技术可行性及初步结果。

Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z
PMID:23494081
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) has several benefits compared with transperitoneal adrenalectomy in that it is safe and has a short learning curve. In addition, it provides direct short access to the target organ, prevents irritation to the intraperitoneal space, and does not require retraction of adjacent organs.1 (-) 3 We have performed several cases of robot-assisted PRA using single-port access for small adrenal tumors. This multimedia article introduces the detailed methods and preliminary results of this procedure.

METHODS

Five patients underwent single-port robot-assisted PRA between March 2010 and June 2011 at our institution. During the procedure, patients were placed in a prone jackknife position with their hip joints bent at a right angle (Fig. 1). A 3 cm transverse skin incision was made just below the lowest tip of the 12th rib (Fig. 2), and the Glove port (Nelis, Kyung-gi, Korea) was placed through the skin incision while maintaining pneumoretroperitoneum (Fig. 3). CO2 was then insufflated to a pressure of 18 mm Hg to create an adequate working space. A 10 mm robotic camera with a 30-degree up view was placed at the center of the incision through the most cephalic portion of the Glove port. A Maryland dissector or Prograsp forceps (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was placed on the medial side of the incision, and Harmonic curved shears (Intuitive Surgical) were placed on the lateral side of the incision (Fig. 4). Using the Maryland dissector and the harmonic curved shears, the Gerota fascia is opened, perinephric fat is dissected, and the kidney upper pole is mobilized to expose the adrenal gland (Fig. 5). Gland dissection starts with lower margin detachment from the upper kidney pole in a lateral to medial direction (Fig. 6). After dissecting the adrenal gland from surrounding adipose tissue and medial isolation of the adrenal central vein, the vessel is ligated with a 5 mm hemolock clip (Fig. 7). Patient clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 56.6 ± 8.7 (range, 47-69) years. Right and left side approaches were used in two and three patients, respectively. All cases were adrenal cortical adenoma. The mean tumor size was 1.48 ± 0.28 (range, 1.0-1.7) cm. The mean surgery duration (skin to skin) was 159.4 ± 57.6 (range, 103-245) minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 46.0 ± 56.8 (range, 5-120) ml. The average time to oral intake and postoperative hospital stay were 0.65 ± 0.11 (range, 0.54-0.79) days and 4.0 ± 2.23 (range, 3-8) days, respectively. There were no conversions to open surgery or postoperative compli- cations.

DISCUSSION

Some trials of minimally invasive single-access surgery of the adrenal gland have recently been performed.4 (,) 5 However, these new techniques have several limitations as a result of restrictions on instrumentation movement because of the small access ports used and relatively low-quality images produced. The recent introduction of the da Vinci S surgical robot system (Intuitive Surgical) to endoscopic surgery has improved instrumental dexterity and provided the surgeon with an ergonomically designed operating system. This system is also potentially safer and more meticulous in performing operations than endoscopic procedures as a result of a 3-D, magnified, stable operative view.6 (,) 7 The advantages of the da Vinci S surgical robot system and the numerous benefits of the posterior retroperitoneal approach motivated us to utilize single-port robot-assisted PRA. The primary selection criteria were small tumor size and a minimal amount of periadrenal fatty tissue because robot-assisted PRA using single-port access provides a small operative space, which causes manipulation problems when tumors are large. To ensure the safe application of these new techniques, we recommend that novice surgeons begin using single-port robot-assisted PRA for smaller tumors < 2 cm in patients with a body mass index of < 30 kg/m(2), gradually extending the size and body mass index as they accumulate experience. Although robot-assisted PRA using single-port access could not be compared with the other robotic adrenalectomy techniques in this study, the potential advantages of this approach compared to conventional robot-assisted transperitoneal adrenalectomy include a reduction in postoperative ileus, bacterial contamination, and intestinal complications because the peritoneal cavity is not opened, in addition to a reduction in postoperative pain because of its minimally invasive nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experiences with robot-assisted PRA using single-port access assured us of its safety and feasibility for the resection of small adrenal tumors. Although single-port robot-assisted PRA appears to be safe and feasible, further experience and research is required to optimize patient selection criteria and verify its advantages over the traditional three-incision PRA technique.

摘要

背景

与经腹腔肾上腺切除术相比,后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术 (PRA) 具有多项优势,因为它安全且学习曲线短。此外,它提供了直接通向目标器官的短通道,防止了对腹腔空间的刺激,并且不需要牵拉相邻器官。1 (-) 3 我们已经使用单端口通道为几个小肾上腺肿瘤患者进行了机器人辅助 PRA。本多媒体文章介绍了该手术的详细方法和初步结果。

方法

2010 年 3 月至 2011 年 6 月,我院对 5 例患者进行了单端口机器人辅助 PRA。手术过程中,患者采用仰卧位,髋关节呈直角弯曲(图 1)。在第 12 肋最低端下方 3cm 处做一个横向皮肤切口(图 2),同时保持气腹,将 Glove 端口(韩国 Kyung-gi 的 Nelis)穿过皮肤切口(图 3)。然后向腹腔内注入二氧化碳,压力为 18mmHg,以创建足够的工作空间。将一个带有 30 度向上视角的 10mm 机器人摄像头通过 Glove 端口最头侧部分的切口放置在中心位置。将 Maryland 解剖器或 Prograsp 夹(Intuitive Surgical,Inc.,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)放在切口的内侧,将 Harmonic 弯剪(Intuitive Surgical)放在切口的外侧(图 4)。使用 Maryland 解剖器和 Harmonic 弯剪,打开 Gerota 筋膜,分离肾周脂肪,将肾上极向上移动以暴露肾上腺(图 5)。从外侧向内侧沿肾上腺下边缘进行肾上腺切除术(图 6)。将肾上腺从周围脂肪组织中分离出来,并将肾上腺中央静脉内侧隔离后,用 5mm Hemolock 夹夹闭血管(图 7)。回顾性分析患者的临床病理数据。

结果

患者平均年龄为 56.6±8.7 岁(范围,47-69 岁)。两名患者采用右侧入路,三名患者采用左侧入路。所有病例均为肾上腺皮质腺瘤。肿瘤平均大小为 1.48±0.28cm(范围,1.0-1.7cm)。手术总时间(皮肤到皮肤)为 159.4±57.6 分钟(范围,103-245 分钟),平均估计失血量为 46.0±56.8ml(范围,5-120ml)。术后开始口服和住院时间分别为 0.65±0.11 天(范围,0.54-0.79 天)和 4.0±2.23 天(范围,3-8 天)。没有转为开放手术或发生术后并发症。

讨论

最近已经进行了一些微创单通道肾上腺手术的试验。4 (,) 5 然而,由于使用的小通道端口限制了器械的运动,并且产生的图像质量较低,这些新技术存在一些局限性。最近引入的达芬奇 S 手术机器人系统(Intuitive Surgical)为内镜手术提供了更好的器械灵巧性,并为外科医生提供了一个符合人体工程学设计的操作系统。与内镜手术相比,该系统在操作时也具有更高的安全性和更精细的特点,因为它提供了一个 3D、放大、稳定的手术视野。6 (,) 7 达芬奇 S 手术机器人系统的优势以及后腹腔镜的众多优势促使我们采用单端口机器人辅助 PRA。主要的选择标准是肿瘤较小且肾上腺周围脂肪组织较少,因为机器人辅助 PRA 采用单端口通道提供的手术空间较小,当肿瘤较大时会导致操作困难。为了确保这些新技术的安全应用,我们建议初学者在 BMI<30kg/m2 且肿瘤<2cm 的患者中使用单端口机器人辅助 PRA 治疗较小的肿瘤,随着经验的积累逐渐扩大肿瘤和 BMI 的大小。虽然在本研究中无法将机器人辅助 PRA 与其他机器人肾上腺切除术技术进行比较,但与传统的机器人经腹腔肾上腺切除术相比,这种方法的潜在优势包括减少术后肠梗阻、细菌污染和肠道并发症,因为没有打开腹腔,并且由于其微创性,术后疼痛也会减轻。

结论

我们对单端口机器人辅助 PRA 的初步经验使我们相信其用于切除小肾上腺肿瘤的安全性和可行性。虽然单端口机器人辅助 PRA 似乎是安全且可行的,但仍需要进一步的经验和研究来优化患者选择标准,并验证其相对于传统的三切口 PRA 技术的优势。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.机器人辅助后腹腔镜单孔入路肾上腺切除术:技术可行性及初步结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
2
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
3
Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.经单侧耳后入路机器人辅助全甲状腺切除术并改良根治性颈清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
Randomized clinical trial of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy versus lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with a 5-year follow-up.随机对照临床试验:后腹腔镜腹膜后肾上腺切除术与经侧腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的 5 年随访比较。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):740-7; discussion 747-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000982.
5
Single-port access adrenalectomy: our initial experience.单孔入路肾上腺切除术:我们的初步经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Nov;21(9):815-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0179. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
6
Single-access retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.单通道后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术
Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013(4):51-5.
7
Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: bilateral step-by-step technique.腹腔镜单孔后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:双侧分步技术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3351-3352. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5400-1. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Improving Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: Selection of Optimal Approach and Comparison of Outcomes.改进微创肾上腺切除术:最佳手术入路的选择及结局比较
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1625-31. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3471-8.
9
Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy without previous control of adrenal vein is feasible and safe for pheochromocytoma.对于嗜铬细胞瘤,不预先控制肾上腺静脉的后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是可行且安全的。
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):849-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.078.
10
Minimally invasive approaches to adrenal tumors: an up-to-date summary including patient position and port placement of laparoscopic, retroperitoneoscopic, robot-assisted, and single-site adrenalectomy.肾上腺肿瘤的微创治疗方法:最新综述,包括腹腔镜、后腹腔镜、机器人辅助及单孔肾上腺切除术的患者体位和端口放置
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jan;27(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000339.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of da Vinci SP and Xi surgical systems for robotic lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy: a retrospective single-center observational study.达芬奇SP手术系统与Xi手术系统用于机器人辅助经腹膜后外侧肾上腺切除术的比较:一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jun;108(6):367-373. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.367. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Single-Port Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: Current Perspectives, Technical Considerations, and Future Directions.单孔机器人后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:当前观点、技术考量及未来方向
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2314. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072314.
3
Safety and feasibility of single-port surgery for posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: a retrospective cohort study.
使用达芬奇SP机器人系统行后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术单孔手术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8269-8276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10380-8. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Efficacy of Using Maryland Forceps Versus Electrocoagulation Hooks in RATS Lung Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.马里兰镊与电钩在大鼠肺癌手术中应用效果的倾向性评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5923-5929. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13813-9. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
5
Single-port technique evolution and current practice in urologic procedures.泌尿外科手术中单孔技术的发展历程与当前应用
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art.机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:最新技术。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1131-1146. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00915-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?单切口机器人肾上腺切除术(SIRA):肾上腺手术的未来?
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):853-858. doi: 10.21037/gs-2019-ra-02.
8
Hemodynamic stability during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: A case control study of posterior retroperitoneal vs lateral transperitoneal approaches.嗜铬细胞瘤肾上腺切除术期间的血流动力学稳定性:后腹膜后入路与侧腹膜前入路的病例对照研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19104. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019104.
9
Comparison of Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy over Laparoscopic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与腹腔镜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:单三级中心经验
Int J Endocrinol. 2019 Dec 1;2019:9012910. doi: 10.1155/2019/9012910. eCollection 2019.
10
Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: current perspectives.机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:当前观点
Robot Surg. 2017 Jan 5;4:1-6. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S100887. eCollection 2017.