• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工程研究开放性的理由。

The case for openness in engineering research.

作者信息

Berg Devin R, Niemeyer Kyle E

机构信息

Engineering & Technology Department, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI, 54751, USA.

School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2018 Apr 26;7:501. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14593.2. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.14593.2
PMID:31543946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6733375/
Abstract

In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the challenges faced by scholars looking to do so. Further, we present our thoughts and reflections on the role that open engineering research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university. We have made some specific recommendations on how the public university can recommit to and push the boundaries of its role as the creator and promoter of public knowledge. In doing so, the university will further demonstrate its vital role in the continued economic, social, and technological development of society. We have also included some thoughts on how this applies specifically to the field of engineering and how a culture of openness and sharing within the engineering community can help drive societal development.

摘要

在本文中,我们阐述了对工程研究开放性的益处及可能存在的弊端的看法。我们试图从多个角度审视这一问题,包括将开放实践引入工程研究人员工作流程的原因和动机,以及寻求这样做的学者所面临的挑战。此外,我们还对开放工程研究在界定大学宗旨和活动方面可发挥的作用进行了思考和反思。我们就公立大学如何重新致力于并拓展其作为公共知识创造者和推动者的角色提出了一些具体建议。通过这样做,大学将进一步彰显其在社会持续经济、社会和技术发展中的重要作用。我们还探讨了这如何具体应用于工程领域,以及工程界内部的开放和共享文化如何有助于推动社会发展。

相似文献

1
The case for openness in engineering research.工程研究开放性的理由。
F1000Res. 2018 Apr 26;7:501. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14593.2. eCollection 2018.
2
Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering-A qualitative interview study.材料科学与工程领域研究数据的搜索、复用与共享:一项定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 15;15(9):e0239216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239216. eCollection 2020.
3
Perspectives on Open Science and scientific data sharing:an interdisciplinary workshop.开放科学与科学数据共享展望:一场跨学科研讨会
J Anthropol Sci. 2014;92:179-200. doi: 10.4436/JASS.92006.
4
The development of a new methodology for knowledge sharing in the interface between university and society--an example from the meat sector.新方法论在大学与社会界面知识共享中的开发——以肉类行业为例。
Meat Sci. 2013 Nov;95(3):672-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.060. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Iranian researchers' perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication.伊朗研究人员对开放科学的概念和对研究出版物影响的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 4;23(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09420-9.
6
The "how" and "whys" of research: life scientists' views of accountability.研究的“方法”和“原因”:生命科学家的问责观。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Dec;35(12):762-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.031781.
7
[Limitations to the use of research results: a Benin researcher’s point of view.].[研究结果应用的局限性:一位贝宁研究人员的观点。]
Sante Publique. 2018 Mar 3;S1(HS):171-174. doi: 10.3917/spub.180.0171.
8
What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.是什么驱动和抑制研究人员共享和使用开放研究数据?一项系统文献综述分析影响开放研究数据采用的因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239283. eCollection 2020.
9
A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰心理学系开放研究实践的注册报告调查。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Aug;115(3):497-534. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12700. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Why Work with Undergraduate Researchers? Differences in Research Advisors' Motivations and Outcomes by Career Stage.为何与本科生研究人员合作?职业阶段不同的研究导师的动机和成果差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0229.

引用本文的文献

1
The principles of tomorrow's university.明日大学的原则。
F1000Res. 2018 Dec 11;7:1926. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17425.1. eCollection 2018.
2
Haves and have nots must find a better way: The case for open scientific hardware.富人与穷人必须找到更好的方法:开放科学硬件的案例。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Sep 27;16(9):e3000014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000014. eCollection 2018 Sep.