• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对《开放科学与改良的资金抽签可能阻碍不良科学的自然选择》的修正

Correction to 'Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science'.

作者信息

Smaldino Paul E, Turner Matthew A, Contreras Kallens Pablo A

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Aug 14;6(8):191249. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191249. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.191249
PMID:31543978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6731693/
Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190194.].

摘要

[本文更正了文章DOI：10.1098/rsos.190194。]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/4444b9d54322/rsos191249-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/708b79fed562/rsos191249-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/39efa0ad5f66/rsos191249-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/576a306a92e0/rsos191249-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/b6f7c332445f/rsos191249-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/27fe120080c6/rsos191249-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/8bda22a20d29/rsos191249-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/4444b9d54322/rsos191249-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/708b79fed562/rsos191249-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/39efa0ad5f66/rsos191249-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/576a306a92e0/rsos191249-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/b6f7c332445f/rsos191249-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/27fe120080c6/rsos191249-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/8bda22a20d29/rsos191249-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2171/6731693/4444b9d54322/rsos191249-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
Correction to 'Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science'.对《开放科学与改良的资金抽签可能阻碍不良科学的自然选择》的修正
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Aug 14;6(8):191249. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191249. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Correction to: 'The natural selection of bad science' (2016) by Paul E. Smaldino and Richard McElreath.对保罗·E·斯马尔迪诺和理查德·麦克尔雷思所著《不良科学的自然选择》（2016年）的勘误
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 6;10(9):rsos231026. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231026. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science.开放科学和改良的资金抽签可能会阻碍对劣质科学的自然筛选。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 10;6(7):190194. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190194. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Correction to 'Natural Frequency Method: estimating the preferred walking speed of based on tail natural frequency'.对《固有频率法：基于尾部固有频率估计[具体对象]的偏好步行速度》的勘误
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jul 21;8(7):211139. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211139. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Replication of the natural selection of bad science.不良科学自然选择的复制。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 22;10(2):221306. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221306. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Correction to: 'Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: The Transparent Psi Project' (2023) by Kekecs .对凯凯茨（Kekecs）所著的《通过提高研究报告的可信度来提升心理科学研究的价值：透明超心理学项目》（2023年）的勘误
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Aug 16;10(8):231080. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231080. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Erratum: Publisher Correction to: Multiple articles in Food Science and Biotechnology.勘误：《食品科学与生物技术》多篇文章的出版商更正。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Jun 12;27(4):1245. doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0398-x. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
Correction to 'Augmenting disease maps: a Bayesian meta-analysis approach'.《增强疾病地图：一种贝叶斯荟萃分析方法》的勘误
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 10;8(2):210085. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210085.
9
Correction to: A framework for the identification of long-term social avoidance in longitudinal datasets.对《纵向数据集中长期社会回避识别框架》的更正
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 19;9(1):220017. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220017. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Predictors of success in a cohort of medical students.一批医学生成功的预测因素。
Med Educ. 1984 Jul;18(4):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01011.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The credibility crisis and democratic governance: how to reform university governance to be compatible with the nature of science.公信力危机与民主治理：如何改革大学治理以使其与科学的本质相契合。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jan 25;10(1):220808. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220808. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.评估 2010 年至 2015 年期间《自然》和《科学》杂志上社会科学实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
3
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond.开放科学在职业生涯早期及以后面临的挑战、获益和技巧。
PLoS Biol. 2019 May 1;17(5):e3000246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246. eCollection 2019 May.
4
Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions.竞赛模式突出了科学资助竞赛固有的低效率。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Jan 2;17(1):e3000065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000065. eCollection 2019 Jan.
5
Persistence of false paradigms in low-power sciences.低效能科学中虚假范式的持续存在。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 26;115(52):13228-13233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816454115. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal .数据可用性、可重用性和分析可重复性：评估期刊强制开放数据政策的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 15;5(8):180448. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180448. eCollection 2018 Aug.
7
Market share and recent hiring trends in anthropology faculty positions.市场份额和人类学教师职位的近期招聘趋势。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0202528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202528. eCollection 2018.
8
Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access.开放获取出版联盟：实现全文免费获取的呼声。
PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 4;15(9):e1002663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002663. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice.尽管有编辑建议，但统计报告不佳、数据呈现不足和歪曲事实的情况仍然存在。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0202121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202121. eCollection 2018.
10
Science journals end open-access trial with Gates Foundation.科学期刊与盖茨基金会结束开放获取试验。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7714):311-312. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05729-2.