Suppr超能文献

社会经济因素对澳大利亚昆士兰州向皇家防止虐待动物协会(RSPCA)报告的犬类福利问题的影响。

Socioeconomic Influences on Reports of Canine Welfare Concerns to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Queensland, Australia.

作者信息

Shih Hao Yu, Paterson Mandy B A, Phillips Clive J C

机构信息

Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, University of Queensland, White House Building (8134), Gatton Campus, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4076, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 23;9(10):711. doi: 10.3390/ani9100711.

Abstract

Human-dog relationships are an important contributor to the welfare of dogs, but little is known about the importance of socioeconomic status of the dogs' owners. We conducted a retrospective study of canine welfare complaints, using Australian government statistics on the socioeconomic status of the inhabitants at the location of the alleged welfare issue. The socioeconomic score of inhabitants at the relevant postcode was assumed to be that of the plaintiff. Our dataset included 107,597 complaints that had been received by RSPCA Queensland between July 2008 and June 2018, each with the following information: the number of dogs involved, dog(s) age, breed(s), suburb, postcode, date received, and complaint code(s) (describing the type of complaint). The median index score for relative social advantage of the locations where the alleged welfare concern occurred was less than the median score for the population of Queensland, suggesting that welfare concerns in dogs were more commonly reported in areas with inhabitants of low socioeconomic status. It was also less if the dog being reported was not of a recognised breed, compared to dogs of recognised breeds. Dogs reported to be in the gundog breed group were in the most socioeconomically advantaged postcodes, followed by toy, hound, non-sporting, working dog, terrier, and utility breed groups. Reports of alleged cruelty, insufficient food and/or water, a dog being not exercised or being confined/tethered, failure to provide shelter or treatment, overcrowding, a dog being in poor condition or living in poor conditions were most likely to be made in relation to dogs in low socioeconomic postcodes. Reports of dogs being left in a hot vehicle unattended were more likely to be made in relation to dogs in high socioeconomic postcodes. It is concluded that both canine welfare complaints and dogs in specific breed groups appear to be related to the owner's socioeconomic status. This study may be used to improve public awareness and to tailor educational campaigns toward different populations.

摘要

人与狗的关系对狗的福祉有重要影响,但对于狗主人的社会经济地位的重要性却知之甚少。我们利用澳大利亚政府关于所谓福利问题发生地居民社会经济地位的统计数据,对犬类福利投诉进行了一项回顾性研究。假定相关邮政编码地区居民的社会经济得分就是投诉人的得分。我们的数据集包括昆士兰皇家防止虐待动物协会在2008年7月至2018年6月期间收到的107597起投诉,每起投诉都包含以下信息:涉及的狗的数量、狗的年龄、品种、郊区、邮政编码、收到日期以及投诉代码(描述投诉类型)。据称存在福利问题的地点的相对社会优势的中位数指数得分低于昆士兰人口的中位数得分,这表明在社会经济地位较低的居民所在地区,犬类福利问题的报告更为常见。与公认品种的狗相比,如果被报告的狗不是公认品种,投诉也较少。据报告,枪猎犬品种组的狗所在的邮政编码地区社会经济优势最大,其次是玩具犬、猎犬、非运动犬、工作犬、梗犬和实用犬品种组。关于所谓的残忍行为、食物和/或水不足、狗未得到锻炼或被限制/拴住、未能提供庇护所或治疗、过度拥挤、狗状况不佳或生活条件差的报告,最有可能是关于社会经济地位较低的邮政编码地区的狗。关于狗被无人看管地留在炎热车辆中的报告,更有可能是关于社会经济地位较高的邮政编码地区的狗。研究得出结论,犬类福利投诉和特定品种组的狗似乎都与主人的社会经济地位有关。这项研究可用于提高公众意识,并针对不同人群开展有针对性的教育活动。

相似文献

9
Canine and human factors related to dog bite injuries.与犬咬伤相关的犬类及人类因素。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Feb 15;232(4):542-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.4.542.

引用本文的文献

7
Issues Regarding the Welfare of Assistance Dogs.辅助犬福利相关问题。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;12(23):3250. doi: 10.3390/ani12233250.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验