Kantathut Narongrit, Cherntanomwong Piya, Khajarern Siam, Leelayana Parinya
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2019 Sep;51(3):153-159.
Unavailability of Plasma-Lyte A precludes the utility of traditional del Nido cardioplegia in many countries. This observational study aimed to evaluate myocardial preservation and clinical outcomes when using lactated Ringer's solution as the base solution for del Nido cardioplegia as compared with our institute's standard blood cardioplegia strategy. Eighty-nine adult patients underwent cardiac surgery for acquired heart disease from February 2017 to November 2017 either with del Nido cardioplegia (n = 44) or blood cardioplegia (n = 45). Clinical data and outcomes were compared. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Troponin T release was lower in the del Nido group on postoperative day 1 (.632 [.437, .907] vs. .827 [.599, 1.388] ng/mL; = .009) and day 2 (.363 [.250, .451] vs. .549 [.340, .897] ng/mL; = .002). The del Nido group exhibited lower total volume of cardioplegia administered (1,075 [1,000, 1,250] vs. 3,400 [2,700, 3,750] mL; < .0001), fewer doses (1.6 ± .7 vs. 4.6 ± 1.3; < .0001), and a decreased incidence of ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross-clamp removal (9.09 vs. 31.11%; = .01). The del Nido group had shorter intensive care unit stays (2 [1, 2] vs. 3 [2, 4] days; < .0001), hospital stays (7 [6, 10] vs. 9 [7, 10] days; = .0002), less vasopressor and inotropic support (1 [1, 1] vs. 1 [1, 2] days; = .0001), and lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (25 vs. 46.7%; = .033). No mortality occurred and clinical outcomes were similar. The use of traditional del Nido cardioplegia ingredients added to lactated Ringer's as the base solution provided either similar or superior myocardial protection than our blood cardioplegia strategy depending on the outcome measure analyzed. The use of lactated Ringer's as a base solution may be an option for centers that do not have access to Plasma-Lyte. Further investigation and follow-up are warranted after this observational study.
在许多国家,由于无法获得平衡液A,传统的德尔尼多心脏停搏液无法使用。本观察性研究旨在评估与我院标准血液心脏停搏液策略相比,使用乳酸林格氏液作为德尔尼多心脏停搏液的基础溶液时的心肌保护和临床结局。2017年2月至2017年11月,89例成年获得性心脏病患者接受心脏手术,其中44例使用德尔尼多心脏停搏液,45例使用血液心脏停搏液。比较临床数据和结局。两组患者特征相似。术后第1天,德尔尼多组肌钙蛋白T释放量较低(0.632[0.437,0.907]对0.827[0.599,1.388]ng/mL;P = 0.009),第2天也较低(0.363[0.250,0.451]对0.549[0.340,0.897]ng/mL;P = 0.002)。德尔尼多组心脏停搏液总用量较低(1075[1000,1250]对3400[2700,3750]mL;P < 0.0001),给药次数较少(1.6±0.7对4.6±1.3;P < 0.0001),主动脉阻断解除后室颤发生率降低(9.09%对31.11%;P = 0.01)。德尔尼多组重症监护病房住院时间较短(2[1,2]天对3[2,4]天;P < 0.0001),住院时间较短(7[6,10]天对9[7,10]天;P = 0.0002),血管活性药物和正性肌力药物支持较少(1[1,1]天对1[1,2]天;P = 0.0001),术后房颤/房扑发生率较低(25%对46.7%;P = 0.033)。无死亡发生,临床结局相似。根据分析的结局指标,将传统德尔尼多心脏停搏液成分添加到乳酸林格氏液中作为基础溶液,提供的心肌保护与我们的血液心脏停搏液策略相似或更好。对于无法获得平衡液的中心,使用乳酸林格氏液作为基础溶液可能是一种选择。在这项观察性研究之后,有必要进行进一步的调查和随访。