Modified del Nido versus blood cardioplegia in congenital cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND

Lactated Ringer-based del Nido cardioplegia has been reported to be safe for acquired cardiac surgery. The original Plasma-Lyte-based solution has been proved for congenital cardiac surgery but its modification has not been adequately examined. We compared the clinical outcomes of congenital cardiac surgery using lactated Ringer-based del Nido cardioplegia versus cold blood cardioplegia.

METHODS

Between September 2018 and November 2020, 116 consecutive patients with congenital heart disease undergoing operations with cardioplegic arrest performed by a single surgeon at Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital; 66 with modified del Nido solution and 50 with institutional's blood cardioplegia. The patient risk profiles, operative details, mortality rates, care durations, inotrope use, blood transfusion and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups, including median age (2.5 vs. 3.1 years; p = 0.49), size, and gender. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery score of 3 to 5 was more prevalent in the del Nido group (24.2% vs. 10%; p = 0.049). There were 4 deaths in the modified del Nido group (risk category score of 4) but none in the cold blood group (p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in median intubation duration, length of intensive care unit stay, and vasoactive medications immediately and 24 h after the operation. The del Nido group required 70 to 100 ml less blood transfusion (p = 0.04). All complications were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes of lactated Ringer-based del Nido cardioplegia were comparable to those of blood cardioplegia in congenital cardiac surgery.