Greenslade Jaimi H, Wallis Marianne, Johnston Amy N B, Carlström Eric, Wilhelms Daniel B, Crilly Julia
Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med J. 2020 Feb;37(2):106-111. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208390. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
The ED Stressor Scale outlines 15 stressors that are of importance for ED staff. Limited research has identified how commonly such stressors occur, or whether such factors are perceived with similar importance across different hospitals. This study sought to examine the frequency or perceived severity of these 15 stressors using a multicentre cohort of emergency clinicians (nurses and physicians) in EDs in two countries (Australia and Sweden).
This was a cross-sectional survey of staff working in eight hospitals in Australia and Sweden. Data were collected between July 2016 and June 2017 (depending on local site approvals) via a printed survey incorporating the 15-item ED stressor scale. The median stress score for each item and the frequency of experiencing each event was reported.
Events causing most distress include heavy workload, death or sexual abuse of a child, inability to provide optimum care and workplace violence. Stressors reported most frequently include dealing with high acuity patients, heavy workload and crowding. Violence, workload, inability to provide optimal care, poor professional relations, poor professional development and dealing with high-acuity patients were reported more commonly by Australian staff. Swedish respondents reported more frequent exposure to mass casualty incidents, crisis management and administrative concerns.
Workload, inability to provide optimal care, workplace violence and death or sexual abuse of a child were consistently reported as the most distressing events across sites. The frequency with which these occurred differed in Australia and Sweden, likely due to differences in the healthcare systems.
急诊应激源量表列出了对急诊工作人员很重要的15种应激源。有限的研究已确定这些应激源出现的频率,以及不同医院对这些因素的重视程度是否相似。本研究旨在通过澳大利亚和瑞典两国急诊科的多中心急诊临床医生(护士和医生)队列,研究这15种应激源出现的频率或感知严重程度。
这是一项对澳大利亚和瑞典8家医院工作人员的横断面调查。在2016年7月至2017年6月期间(取决于当地机构批准情况),通过一份包含15项急诊应激源量表的纸质调查问卷收集数据。报告了每个项目的应激得分中位数以及每个事件的发生频率。
造成最大困扰的事件包括工作量大、儿童死亡或遭受性虐待、无法提供最佳护理以及工作场所暴力。报告最频繁的应激源包括处理急症患者、工作量大以及拥挤。澳大利亚工作人员报告的暴力、工作量、无法提供最佳护理、专业关系差、职业发展不佳以及处理急症患者的情况更为常见。瑞典受访者报告更频繁地接触大规模伤亡事件、危机管理和行政问题。
各地一致报告工作量大、无法提供最佳护理、工作场所暴力以及儿童死亡或遭受性虐待是最令人苦恼的事件。这些事件在澳大利亚和瑞典的发生频率有所不同,这可能是由于医疗系统的差异。