影响全膝关节置换决策的患者因素有哪些?一项针对膝关节骨关节炎患者的定性研究。
What are the patient factors that impact on decisions to progress to total knee replacement? A qualitative study involving patients with knee osteoarthritis.
作者信息
O'Brien Penny, Bunzli Samantha, Ayton Darshini, Dowsey Michelle M, Gunn Jane, Manski-Nankervis Jo-Anne
机构信息
Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
出版信息
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e031310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031310.
OBJECTIVES
General practitioners (GPs) are often the first health professionals to assess patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Despite clinical guideline recommendations for non-surgical intervention as first-line therapies, the most frequent referral from a GP for a person with knee OA is to an orthopaedic surgeon. The aim of our study was to explore patient factors that impact on the decision to progress to total knee replacement (TKR), including the experience of patients in general practice, their perceptions of their condition, and their access and use of community-based allied health interventions.
DESIGN
Qualitative investigation using semi-structured interviews. The Candidacy framework was selected as a lens to examine the factors driving healthcare access. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Codes identified in the data were mapped to the seven Candidacy domains. Themes corresponding to each domain were described.
SETTING
A public hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
PARTICIPANTS
27 patients with knee OA who were on a waiting list to undergo TKR.
RESULTS
Ten themes described factors influencing access and use of non-surgical interventions and decision-making for undergoing TKR: (1) History of knee problems, change in symptoms; (2) Physical and psychosocial functioning (Identification of Candidacy); (3) GP and social networks as information sources, access to care (Navigation); (4) Referral pathways (Permeability of services); (5) Communication of impact (Appearances at health services); (6) GP-Surgeon as the predominant referral pathway (Adjudications); (7) Physical activity as painful; (8) Beliefs about effectiveness of non-surgical interventions (Offers and resistance); (9) Familiarity with local system; and (10) Availability (Operating conditions and local production of Candidacy).
CONCLUSIONS
Using the Candidacy framework to analyse patients' experiences when deciding to progress to TKR highlighted missed opportunities in general practice to orient patients to first try non-surgical interventions. Patients with knee OA also require improved support to navigate allied health services.
目的
全科医生(GP)通常是首批评估骨关节炎(OA)患者的医疗专业人员。尽管临床指南推荐非手术干预作为一线治疗方法,但全科医生最常将膝骨关节炎患者转诊给骨科医生。我们研究的目的是探讨影响患者决定进行全膝关节置换术(TKR)的因素,包括患者在全科医疗中的经历、他们对自身病情的认知,以及他们获得和使用社区联合健康干预措施的情况。
设计
采用半结构化访谈的定性调查。选择候选资格框架作为审视推动医疗服务获取因素的视角。使用主题分析方法对数据进行分析。将数据中识别出的代码映射到七个候选资格领域。描述了与每个领域相对应的主题。
地点
澳大利亚墨尔本的一家公立医院。
参与者
27名等待进行全膝关节置换术的膝骨关节炎患者。
结果
十个主题描述了影响非手术干预措施的获取和使用以及进行全膝关节置换术决策的因素:(1)膝关节问题病史、症状变化;(2)身体和心理社会功能(候选资格的确定);(3)全科医生和社交网络作为信息来源、获得医疗服务的途径(导航);(4)转诊途径(服务的渗透性);(5)影响的沟通(在医疗服务机构的就诊情况);(6)全科医生 - 外科医生作为主要转诊途径(裁决);(7)身体活动会引起疼痛;(8)对非手术干预措施有效性的看法(提议与抵触);(9)对当地医疗系统的熟悉程度;以及(10)可及性(候选资格的操作条件和当地产生情况)。
结论
使用候选资格框架分析患者决定进行全膝关节置换术时的经历,突显了全科医疗中存在的错失机会,即未引导患者首先尝试非手术干预措施。膝骨关节炎患者在获取联合健康服务方面也需要得到更好的支持。
相似文献
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023-5-1
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-5-30
引用本文的文献
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025-4-23
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025-1
本文引用的文献
Joint Bone Spine. 2017-7-27
Healthcare (Basel). 2016-6-29
N Engl J Med. 2015-10-22
Nurs Clin North Am. 2015-6