Suppr超能文献

对最差的健康结果感到满意或对最好的结果不满意:解释膝关节置换患者中良好的患者报告结果与低满意度之间的差异,反之亦然——一项回顾性队列研究。

Satisfied with the worst health outcomes or unsatisfied with the best: explaining the divergence between good patient-reported outcomes and low satisfaction and vice versa among knee arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Schöner Lukas, Steinbeck Viktoria, Busse Reinhard, Marques Carlos J

机构信息

Department of Health Care Management, School of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, (Secretariat H80) Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Performance, Neuroscience, Therapy, and Health, Institute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 23;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05507-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis but some patients exhibit a discrepancy between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient satisfaction (PS). This study aims to identify predictors for patients reporting unfavorable PROs but high PS and vice versa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study categorized patients from nine German hospitals into four groups based on (i) whether they achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in knee functionality, measured with a joint-specific PRO from admission to 12-month post-surgery; and (ii) whether they were satisfied at 12 months post-surgery. The groups were (A) Satisfied Achievers (satisfied, MCID reached), (B) Dissatisfied Achievers (not satisfied, MCID reached), (C) Satisfied Non-Achievers (satisfied, MCID not reached) and (D) Dissatisfied Non-Achievers (not satisfied, MCID not reached). Exploratory analyses were performed to understand differences between the four groups using chi-squared tests and ANOVA. Multinomial logistic regression models were conducted to identify predictors for the allocation of patients in groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1546 knee arthroplasty patients with a mean age of 65.9 years, 54.1% female, were included. 1146 (74.1%) patients were Satisfied Achievers, 131 (8.5%) were Dissatisfied Achievers, 141 (9.1%) were Satisfied Non-Achievers, and 128 (8.3%) Dissatisfied Non-Achievers. The results showed that higher improvements in health-related quality of life, pain and fatigue symptoms significantly decreased the likelihood of being a Dissatisfied Achiever and a Satisfied Non-Achiever. Comorbidities of blood circulation, chronic back pain or diabetes increased the likelihood of being a Dissatisfied Achiever, while depression decreased the likelihood of being a Satisfied Non-Achiever.

CONCLUSION

Addressing individual health concerns, e.g. through expectation management, and assessing alternative treatment options might improve satisfaction in line with functional improvements. A closer evaluation at which physical impairment level surgery is beneficial could help to improve the care of Satisfied Non-Achievers.

摘要

目的

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是终末期膝骨关节炎患者的有效治疗方法,但部分患者的患者报告结局(PROs)与患者满意度(PS)之间存在差异。本研究旨在确定报告不良PROs但高PS的患者以及反之情况的预测因素。

材料与方法

这项回顾性队列研究将来自九家德国医院的患者根据以下因素分为四组:(i)从入院到术后12个月,使用特定关节PRO测量的膝关节功能是否达到最小临床重要差异(MCID);以及(ii)术后12个月时是否满意。分组如下:(A)满意达标者(满意,达到MCID),(B)不满意达标者(不满意,达到MCID),(C)满意未达标者(满意,未达到MCID)和(D)不满意未达标者(不满意,未达到MCID)。使用卡方检验和方差分析进行探索性分析,以了解四组之间的差异。进行多项逻辑回归模型以确定患者分组的预测因素。

结果

共纳入1546例膝关节置换患者,平均年龄65.9岁,女性占54.1%。1146例(74.1%)患者为满意达标者,131例(8.5%)为不满意达标者,141例(9.1%)为满意未达标者,128例(8.3%)为不满意未达标者。结果表明,健康相关生活质量、疼痛和疲劳症状的更大改善显著降低了成为不满意达标者和满意未达标者的可能性。血液循环、慢性背痛或糖尿病的合并症增加了成为不满意达标者的可能性,而抑郁症降低了成为满意未达标者的可能性。

结论

解决个体健康问题,例如通过期望管理,并评估替代治疗方案,可能会使满意度与功能改善相一致。对手术在何种身体损伤水平有益进行更密切的评估,可能有助于改善满意未达标者的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bb/11755965/607d24942356/13018_2025_5507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验