Suppr超能文献

一般任务指令和选择性任务指令对学生处理多个冲突文档的作用。

The Role of General and Selective Task Instructions on Students' Processing of Multiple Conflicting Documents.

作者信息

Cerdán Raquel, Marín Maria Del Carmen

机构信息

Research Unit on Reading, ERI Lectura, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Pureza de María-Grao School, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01958. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

This study was designed to test the role of general and selective task instructions when processing documents, which vary as regards trustworthiness and position toward a conflicting topic. With selective task instructions, we refer to concrete guidelines as how to read the texts and how to select appropriate documents and contents, in contrast to general task instructions. Sixty-one secondary school students were presented with four different conflicting documents in an electronic learning environment and were told to write an essay based on the information from the texts. Only half of the students were told to only use information from two out of the four texts to write their essay (i.e., selective condition). As predicted, students told to focus on specific documents and not use all of them for the assigned task (i.e., selective condition) better discriminated the quality of documents and type of information for the task.

摘要

本研究旨在测试在处理文件时通用任务指令和选择性任务指令所起的作用,这些文件在可信度以及对冲突主题的立场方面存在差异。与通用任务指令不同,选择性任务指令是指关于如何阅读文本以及如何选择合适文件和内容的具体指导方针。61名中学生在电子学习环境中收到了四份不同的冲突文件,并被告知根据文本中的信息写一篇文章。只有一半的学生被告知仅使用四份文本中的两份信息来写文章(即选择性条件)。正如预测的那样,被告知专注于特定文件且不为指定任务使用所有文件的学生(即选择性条件),能更好地辨别文件质量和任务所需信息类型。

相似文献

1
The Role of General and Selective Task Instructions on Students' Processing of Multiple Conflicting Documents.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01958. eCollection 2019.
2
Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):179-92. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1.
3
Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 May;27(3):212-25. doi: 10.1111/jar.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Effects of context and discrepancy when reading multiple documents.
Read Writ. 2023;36(5):1111-1143. doi: 10.1007/s11145-022-10321-2. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
[The effect of reading tasks on learning from multiple texts].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Jun;85(2):203-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13309.
7
Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading.
Span J Psychol. 2015 Dec 28;18:E102. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.101.
8
Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Sep;83(Pt 3):502-20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02079.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Understanding abstract expository texts.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Jun;72(Pt 2):279-97. doi: 10.1348/000709902158892.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of emotional working memory predict depression and anxiety.
Front Neurosci. 2025 May 14;19:1574901. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1574901. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 29;9:2294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02294. eCollection 2018.
3
The benefit of self-testing and interleaving for synthesizing concepts across multiple physiology texts.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Sep;40(3):329-34. doi: 10.1152/advan.00157.2015.
4
Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):179-92. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验