• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对向自信的信息提供者学习的偏好中的个体差异。

Individual Differences in Children's Preference to Learn From a Confident Informant.

作者信息

Juteau Aimie-Lee, Cossette Isabelle, Millette Marie-Pier, Brosseau-Liard Patricia

机构信息

Childhood Thinking Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02006. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02006
PMID:31551867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6733991/
Abstract

Past research has demonstrated that children can use an informant's confidence level to selectively choose from whom to learn. Yet, in any given study, not all children show a preference to learn from the most confident informant. Are individual differences in this preference stable over time and across learning situations? In two studies, we evaluated the stability of preschoolers' performance on selective learning tasks using confidence as a cue. The first study ( = 48) presented children with the same two informants, one confident and one hesitant, and the same four test trials twice with a 1-week delay between administrations. The second study ( = 50) presented two parallel tasks with different pairs of informants and test trials one after the other in the same testing session. Correlations between administrations were moderate in the first study and small in the second study, suggesting that children show some stability in their preference to learn from a confident individual but that their performance is also influenced by important situational factors, measurement error or both. Implications for the study of individual differences in selective social learning are discussed.

摘要

过去的研究表明,儿童能够利用信息提供者的自信程度来有选择地决定向谁学习。然而,在任何一项特定研究中,并非所有儿童都表现出更倾向于向最自信的信息提供者学习。这种偏好上的个体差异在不同时间和不同学习情境下是否稳定呢?在两项研究中,我们以自信作为线索,评估了学龄前儿童在选择性学习任务中的表现稳定性。第一项研究(n = 48)向儿童呈现相同的两名信息提供者,一名自信,一名犹豫,并在两次施测之间间隔1周,对相同的四项测试试验进行了两次呈现。第二项研究(n = 50)在同一次测试环节中依次呈现了两个平行任务,每个任务有不同的信息提供者对和测试试验。在第一项研究中,两次施测之间的相关性为中等程度,在第二项研究中为较小程度,这表明儿童在向自信个体学习的偏好上表现出一定的稳定性,但他们的表现也受到重要情境因素、测量误差或两者的影响。我们还讨论了这些结果对选择性社会学习中个体差异研究的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb20/6733991/bea35d5b34d1/fpsyg-10-02006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb20/6733991/8109c62a8b89/fpsyg-10-02006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb20/6733991/bea35d5b34d1/fpsyg-10-02006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb20/6733991/8109c62a8b89/fpsyg-10-02006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb20/6733991/bea35d5b34d1/fpsyg-10-02006-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual Differences in Children's Preference to Learn From a Confident Informant.儿童对向自信的信息提供者学习的偏好中的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02006. eCollection 2019.
2
Do children interpret informants' confidence as person-specific or situational?儿童是否将信息提供者的信心解释为特定于人的还是情境的?
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0298183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298183. eCollection 2024.
3
Preschoolers' Preference for Syntactic Complexity Varies by Socioeconomic Status.学龄前儿童对句法复杂性的偏好因社会经济地位而异。
Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1529-37. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12553. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning.心理理论选择性地预测学龄前儿童基于知识的选择性词汇学习。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;33(4):464-75. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12107. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
"Why does rain fall?": children prefer to learn from an informant who uses noncircular explanations.“雨为何降落?”:儿童更倾向于向使用非循环解释的信息提供者学习。
Child Dev. 2014 Sep-Oct;85(5):1827-35. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12240. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
6
The role of epistemic and social characteristics in children's selective trust: Three meta-analyses.认知和社会特征在儿童选择性信任中的作用:三项元分析。
Dev Sci. 2020 Mar;23(2):e12895. doi: 10.1111/desc.12895. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
7
You seem certain but you were wrong before: developmental change in preschoolers' relative trust in accurate versus confident speakers.你似乎很确定,但你之前也错了:学龄前儿童对准确与自信的说话者相对信任度的发展变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108308. eCollection 2014.
8
The beautiful and the accurate: Are children's selective trust decisions biased?美与准:儿童的选择性信任决策存在偏差吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Children's and adults' epistemic trust in and impressions of inaccurate informants.儿童和成人对不准确信息源的认知信任和印象。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104662. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104662. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
The good, the strong, and the accurate: preschoolers' evaluations of informant attributes.好的、强的、准确的:学前儿童对信息提供者属性的评价。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):561-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeking versus receiving help: How children integrate suggestions in memory decisions.寻求帮助与接受帮助:儿童如何在记忆决策中整合建议
Child Dev. 2024 Mar-Apr;95(2):515-529. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14009. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
(In)Sensitivity to Accuracy? Children's and Adults' Decisions About Who to Trust: The Teacher or the Internet.对准确性的(不)敏感?儿童和成人关于信任对象的决策:教师还是互联网。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 28;11:551131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551131. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Children's selective trust decisions: rational competence and limiting performance factors.儿童的选择性信任决策:理性能力与限制表现因素。
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12527. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
2
The beautiful and the accurate: Are children's selective trust decisions biased?美与准:儿童的选择性信任决策存在偏差吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
3
Preschoolers' Preference for Syntactic Complexity Varies by Socioeconomic Status.学龄前儿童对句法复杂性的偏好因社会经济地位而异。
Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1529-37. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12553. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning.心理理论选择性地预测学龄前儿童基于知识的选择性词汇学习。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;33(4):464-75. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12107. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
Can't stop believing: inhibitory control and resistance to misleading testimony.无法停止相信:抑制控制与对误导性证词的抵抗
Dev Sci. 2014 Nov;17(6):965-76. doi: 10.1111/desc.12187. Epub 2014 May 8.
6
Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood.预示着威权主义?儿童早期对权威的取向。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr;25(4):883-92. doi: 10.1177/0956797613516470. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
Knowledge matters: how children evaluate the reliability of testimony as a process of rational inference.知识很重要:儿童如何将证词的可靠性评估作为理性推理的过程。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):779-97. doi: 10.1037/a0034191. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
Selective social learning: new perspectives on learning from others.选择性社会学习:从他人学习的新视角。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):399-403. doi: 10.1037/a0031619.
9
Knowing when to doubt: developing a critical stance when learning from others. 知道何时质疑:从他人学习时培养批判性立场。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):404-18. doi: 10.1037/a0029500. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
10
Epistemic states and traits: preschoolers appreciate the differential informativeness of situation-specific and person-specific cues to knowledge.认识状态和特征:学龄前儿童理解特定情境和特定人物线索在知识上的不同信息量。
Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):1788-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01662.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.