• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认识状态和特征:学龄前儿童理解特定情境和特定人物线索在知识上的不同信息量。

Epistemic states and traits: preschoolers appreciate the differential informativeness of situation-specific and person-specific cues to knowledge.

机构信息

University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):1788-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01662.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01662.x
PMID:22004452
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that preschoolers can use situation-specific (e.g., visual access) and person-specific (e.g., prior accuracy) cues to infer what others know. The present studies investigated whether 4- and 5-year-olds appreciate the differential informativeness of these types of cues. In Experiment 1 (N = 50), children used others' prior labeling accuracy as a cue when learning labels for, but not the visual identity of, hidden objects. In Experiment 2 (N = 64), with both cues present, children attended more to visual access than prior accuracy when learning the visual identity of, but not labels for, hidden objects. These findings demonstrate that children appreciate the difference between situation- and person-specific cues and flexibly evaluate these cues depending on what information they are seeking.

摘要

先前的研究表明,学龄前儿童可以使用特定情境(例如,视觉接触)和特定人物(例如,先前的准确性)线索来推断他人的所知。本研究探讨了 4 至 5 岁儿童是否理解这些类型线索的不同信息量。在实验 1(N = 50)中,当学习隐藏物体的标签时,儿童将他人先前的标记准确性用作线索,但不会将视觉身份用作线索。在实验 2(N = 64)中,当两种线索都存在时,儿童在学习隐藏物体的视觉身份时,更多地关注视觉接触而不是先前的准确性,但在学习隐藏物体的标签时则不是这样。这些发现表明,儿童理解特定情境和特定人物线索之间的差异,并根据他们所寻求的信息灵活地评估这些线索。

相似文献

1
Epistemic states and traits: preschoolers appreciate the differential informativeness of situation-specific and person-specific cues to knowledge.认识状态和特征:学龄前儿童理解特定情境和特定人物线索在知识上的不同信息量。
Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):1788-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01662.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
2
Preschoolers' extension of novel words to animals and artifacts.学龄前儿童对动物和人工制品的新词扩展。
J Child Lang. 2010 Sep;37(4):913-27. doi: 10.1017/S030500090999002X. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
3
Infants interpret ambiguous requests for absent objects.婴儿能够理解对不存在物体的模糊请求。
Dev Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):696-704. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.696.
4
Children's understanding of cognitive cuing: how to manipulate cues to fool a competitor.儿童对认知线索的理解:如何操控线索以欺骗竞争对手。
Child Dev. 1990 Jun;61(3):697-704.
5
Preschoolers' use of morphosyntactic cues to identify generic sentences: indefinite singular noun phrases, tense, and aspect.学前儿童使用形态句法线索识别泛指句:不定单数名词短语、时态和体貌。
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1561-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01615.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
6
Development of knowledge about the use of cues to aid prospective retrieval.关于使用线索辅助前瞻性检索的知识发展。
Child Dev. 1985 Jun;56(3):631-42.
7
The dynamics of preschoolers' categorization choices.学龄前儿童分类选择的动态变化。
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):740-67.
8
Children's sensitivity to the conventionality of sources.儿童对来源常规性的敏感性。
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):652-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01421.x.
9
Children's use of mutual exclusivity to learn labels for parts of objects.儿童利用互斥性来学习物体各部分的标签。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):592-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014838.
10
Setting goals to switch between tasks: effect of cue transparency on children's cognitive flexibility.设定任务切换目标:线索透明度对儿童认知灵活性的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):782-97. doi: 10.1037/a0015409.

引用本文的文献

1
Do children interpret informants' confidence as person-specific or situational?儿童是否将信息提供者的信心解释为特定于人的还是情境的?
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0298183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298183. eCollection 2024.
2
Epistemic trust: a comprehensive review of empirical insights and implications for developmental psychopathology.认知信任:对实证见解及对发展性精神病理学影响的全面综述
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.
3
Individual Differences in Children's Preference to Learn From a Confident Informant.
儿童对向自信的信息提供者学习的偏好中的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02006. eCollection 2019.
4
Varieties of trust in preschoolers' learning and practical decisions.学龄前儿童在学习和实际决策中的信任多样性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0202506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202506. eCollection 2018.
5
What I don't know won't hurt you: The relation between professed ignorance and later knowledge claims.我不知道的事不会伤害到你:宣称的无知与后来的知识主张之间的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):826-835. doi: 10.1037/dev0000294. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability.关于知识的推理:儿童对普遍性和可验证性的评估。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Dec;83:22-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
7
Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning.心理理论选择性地预测学龄前儿童基于知识的选择性词汇学习。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;33(4):464-75. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12107. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
8
You seem certain but you were wrong before: developmental change in preschoolers' relative trust in accurate versus confident speakers.你似乎很确定,但你之前也错了:学龄前儿童对准确与自信的说话者相对信任度的发展变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108308. eCollection 2014.
9
Rethinking conformity and imitation: divergence, convergence, and social understanding.重新思考从众与模仿:分歧、趋同与社会理解。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 8;5:726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726. eCollection 2014.
10
Informants' traits weigh heavily in young children's trust in testimony and in their epistemic inferences.信息提供者的特征在幼儿对证言的信任和他们的认识推论中起着重要作用。
Child Dev. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):1253-68. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12029. Epub 2012 Dec 13.