Suppr超能文献

在线学习的成本:探究在线与面对面社区大学发展数学课程中动机与学业成果的差异

The Costs of Online Learning: Examining Differences in Motivation and Academic Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Community College Developmental Mathematics Courses.

作者信息

Francis Michelle K, Wormington Stephanie V, Hulleman Chris

机构信息

Curry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 10;10:2054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02054. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Although online courses are becoming increasingly popular in higher education, evidence is inconclusive regarding whether online students are likely to be as academically successful and motivated as students in face-to-face courses. In this study, we documented online and face-to-face students' academic motivation and outcomes in community college mathematics courses, and whether differences might vary based on student characteristics (i.e., gender, underrepresented ethnic/racial minority status, first-generation college status, and adult learner status). Over 2,400 developmental mathematics students reported on their math motivation at the beginning (Week 1) and middle (Weeks 3, 5) of the semester. Findings indicated that online students received lower grades and were less likely to pass from their courses than face-to-face students, with online adult learners receiving particularly low final course grades and pass rates. In contrast, online and face-to-face students did not differ on incoming motivation, with subgroup analyses suggesting largely similar patterns of motivation across student groups. Together, findings suggest that online and face-to-face students may differ overall in academic outcomes but not in their motivation or differentially based on student characteristics. Small but significant differences on academic outcomes across modalities (Cohen's s = 0.17-0.28) have implications for community college students' success in online learning environments, particularly for adult learners who are most likely to be faced with competing demands.

摘要

尽管在线课程在高等教育中越来越受欢迎,但关于在线课程的学生在学业上是否可能与面授课程的学生一样成功并具有学习动力,证据尚无定论。在本研究中,我们记录了社区大学数学课程中在线学习和面授学习的学生的学习动力及学习成果,以及这些差异是否会因学生特征(即性别、代表性不足的少数族裔/种族身份、第一代大学生身份和成年学习者身份)而有所不同。超过2400名学习发展数学的学生在学期开始时(第1周)和中期(第3、5周)报告了他们的数学学习动力。研究结果表明,与面授课程的学生相比,在线学习的学生成绩较低,通过课程的可能性也较小,其中在线成年学习者的期末课程成绩和通过率尤其低。相比之下,在线学习和面授学习的学生在入学时的学习动力并无差异,亚组分析表明不同学生群体的学习动力模式大致相似。总体而言,研究结果表明,在线学习和面授学习的学生在学业成果上可能存在差异,但在学习动力方面没有差异,也不会因学生特征而产生不同。不同教学模式在学业成果上存在微小但显著的差异(科恩效应量s = 0.17 - 0.28),这对社区大学学生在在线学习环境中的成功具有影响,特别是对于最有可能面临各种竞争需求的成年学习者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f9/6746985/d74bbc8da2d6/fpsyg-10-02054-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验