• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化再植/血运重建:影响显微外科手术成功的预测因素——单中心研究

Digital replantation/revascularization: predictive factors to microsurgery success-a single-center study.

机构信息

Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Parc Taulí, C/Parc del Taulí, 1, 08208, Barcelona, Spain.

Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, C/Carrer Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):225-232. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01226-x. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-019-01226-x
PMID:31552437
Abstract

PURPOSE

Success rate in replantation/revascularization digital surgery is one of the challenges of reconstructive surgery. For this reason, investigating prognostic factors for survival and improvement of outcomes is highly relevant. The goal of this study was to establish predictive factors of survival in replantation/revascularization digital surgery.

METHODS

A descriptive, retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent urgent replantation/revascularization digital surgery in our center between January 2007 and July 2017. A total of 116 patients and 157 digits were included. Outcome (survival) factors evaluated were: preoperatively: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA anesthesia score, comorbidities (smoking status, diabetes mellitus, hypertension), coagulation, type of lesion, number of affected digits, position of affected digits, injury mechanism, ischemia time; time between accident and the surgery; intraoperatively: anesthetic technique, fluid therapy (administered volume), length of surgery; and postoperatively: post-surgical complications, re-intervention requirements, surgical success rate. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate outcome and elicit predictive factors.

RESULTS

157 digits from a total of 116 patients were included. Statistically significant differences regarding predictors of survival of replantation were found in ischemia time (0 0.003), length of surgery (p 0.004), post-surgical complications (p 0.000) and replantation need (p 0.000). The rest of analyzed variables were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Revascularization surgery had a greater success rate than replantation (p 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Success rate in traumatic digital surgery is greater when revascularization surgery is performed, rather than replantation. Preoperative ischemia time, length of surgery, postoperative complications and re-intervention requirement are the factors that affect survival rate.

摘要

目的

再植/血运重建数字手术的成功率是重建手术面临的挑战之一。因此,研究与生存率和结果改善相关的预后因素具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定再植/血运重建数字手术中生存的预测因素。

方法

对 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月在我中心行紧急再植/血运重建数字手术的患者进行描述性、回顾性研究。共纳入 116 例患者,157 个手指。评估的结局(生存)因素包括:术前:年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、ASA 麻醉评分、合并症(吸烟状况、糖尿病、高血压)、凝血功能、损伤类型、受累手指数量、受累手指位置、损伤机制、缺血时间;事故与手术之间的时间;术中:麻醉技术、液体疗法(给予的体积)、手术时间;术后:术后并发症、再次干预需求、手术成功率。进行统计学分析以评估结局并得出预测因素。

结果

共纳入 116 例患者的 157 个手指。缺血时间(0.003)、手术时间(p=0.004)、术后并发症(p=0.000)和再植需求(p=0.000)与再植生存率的预测因素有统计学显著差异。分析的其他变量无统计学意义(p>0.05)。血运重建手术的成功率高于再植(p=0.001)。

结论

当进行血运重建手术而不是再植时,创伤性手指手术的成功率更高。术前缺血时间、手术时间、术后并发症和再次干预需求是影响生存率的因素。

相似文献

1
Digital replantation/revascularization: predictive factors to microsurgery success-a single-center study.数字化再植/血运重建:影响显微外科手术成功的预测因素——单中心研究
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):225-232. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01226-x. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
[Acute vascular disorder as a complication of replantation and revascularization of the digital area].[急性血管疾病作为指部再植和血管重建的并发症]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1990 Jan;22(1):39-45.
3
Effect of vasopressor use on digit survival after replantation and revascularization-A large retrospective cohort study.血管加压素使用对再植和再血管化后手指存活的影响:一项大型回顾性队列研究。
Microsurgery. 2020 Jan;40(1):5-11. doi: 10.1002/micr.30461. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
Is Prolonged Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Postoperative Antithrombotic and Antispasmodic Treatments Necessary After Digit Replantation or Revascularization?断指再植或血运重建术后是否需要长时间使用抗生素预防和术后抗血栓及解痉治疗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Aug 1;481(8):1583-1594. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002578. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
The Effect of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Digital Revascularization or Replantation.年龄增加对数字化血运重建或再植术结局的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):495-502. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005195.
6
The Effect of Smoking on Necrosis Rate in Digital Replantation and Revascularization with Prostaglandin E1 Therapy: A Retrospective Study.吸烟对前列腺素E1治疗的断指再植与血管重建中坏死率的影响:一项回顾性研究
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):848-853. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002600.
7
Controlled continuous systemic heparinization increases success rate of artery-only anastomosis replantation in single distal digit amputation: A retrospective cohort study.控制性持续全身肝素化提高单指末节离断仅动脉吻合再植成功率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(26):e3979. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003979.
8
Replantation and revascularization of amputated upper limb appendages outcome and predicting the factors influencing the success rates of these procedures in a tertiary hospital: An 8-year retrospective, cross-sectional study.三级医院上肢离断再植与血管重建的结果及影响这些手术成功率的预测因素:一项8年回顾性横断面研究
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017749983. doi: 10.1177/2309499017749983.
9
Analysis of prognostic factors in ring avulsion injuries.环形撕脱伤预后因素分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Nov;29(6):1028-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.015.
10
Secondary subdermal pocket procedure for venous insufficiency after digital replantation/revascularization.数字再植/血管重建术后静脉功能不全的二期皮下囊袋手术
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73(6):662-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828986b1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Anesthesia Type on Finger Replantation Surgery Success.评估麻醉类型对手指再植手术成功率的影响。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2025 Mar 18;59(1):15-19. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2024.77503. eCollection 2025.
2
Anatomical relationship between the profunda brachii artery and the radial nerve at the entrance and within the radial groove.肱深动脉与桡神经在桡神经沟入口处及沟内的解剖关系。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2025 Mar 3;47(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00276-025-03605-z.
3
Factors Associated with Unsuccessful Revascularization Surgery in Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputation.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of continuous axillary brachial plexus block with ropivacaine infusion on skin temperature and survival of crushed fingers after microsurgical replantation.罗哌卡因持续腋路臂丛神经阻滞对显微外科再植术后断指皮肤温度及存活情况的影响
Chang Gung Med J. 2005 Aug;28(8):567-74.
2
Regional anesthesia for microsurgery in China: a review.中国显微外科手术的区域麻醉:综述
Reg Anesth. 1989 Mar-Apr;14(2):55-7.
创伤性上肢截肢血管重建手术失败的相关因素
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Dec 3;9(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
4
Hand Digit Revascularization: Could Be an "Elective-Urgence" Surgery?手部手指血管重建术:会是一种“选择性急症”手术吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5120. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175120.
5
Success Rates of Finger Revascularization and Replantation.手指血管重建与再植的成功率
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 4;12(3):e5638. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005638. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Replantation of digit-tip amputation caused by crush injuries with supermicrosurgery technique.应用超微外科技术再植挤压性断指指尖。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1497-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02485-z. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
A comparative study of digital nerve and digital arterial repairs performed using running versus interrupted suture techniques in finger replantations.在手指再植中,采用连续缝合与间断缝合技术修复指神经和指动脉的对比研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Feb;29(2):236-246. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.23012.
8
A Case Report of Ring Avulsion Injury: Under-recognized for Its Unique Implications in Transfer.环形撕脱伤病例报告:因其在转移中的独特影响而未得到充分认识。
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;5(1):75-78. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2020.11.49917.