• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对局部和局部晚期前列腺癌患者使用的 EPIC-26 问卷德语版进行心理计量学验证。

Psychometric validation of the German version of the EPIC-26 questionnaire for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

机构信息

German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, Berlin, 14057, Germany.

OnkoZert, Neu-Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02949-7. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02949-7
PMID:31552467
Abstract

PURPOSE

For patients with prostate cancer, validated and reliable instruments are essential for measuring patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to validate the German version of the widely established Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite with 26 items (EPIC-26).

METHODS

A German translation of the original questionnaire was tested in 3094 patients with localized or locally advanced (any T, any N and M0) prostate cancer with treatment intent (including radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, active surveillance, watchful waiting). They completed the EPIC-26 questionnaire before treatment. A total of 521 of them also completed a questionnaire 12 months afterward. Internal consistency, sensitivity to change, and construct validity were assessed.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of all domains was sufficient (Cronbach's alpha between 0.64 and 0.93). Item-to-scale correlation coefficients showed acceptable associations between items and their domain score (all > 0.30), with the lowest scores for "bloody stools" (r = 0.37) and "breast problems" (r = 0.32). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis confirmed the five-dimension structure of the EPIC-26 (comparative fit index 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychometric evaluation suggests that the German version of the EPIC-26 is a well-constructed instrument for measuring patient-reported health-related symptoms in patients with prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

对于前列腺癌患者,有效的和可靠的工具对于测量患者报告的结果是至关重要的。本研究的目的是验证广泛应用的 26 项扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC-26)的德语版本。

方法

对 3094 名有局限性或局部进展性(任何 T、任何 N 和 M0)前列腺癌治疗意向的患者(包括根治性前列腺切除术、近距离放射治疗、主动监测、观察等待)进行了原始问卷的德语翻译测试。他们在治疗前完成了 EPIC-26 问卷。其中共有 521 名患者在 12 个月后也完成了一份问卷。评估了内部一致性、变化敏感性和结构有效性。

结果

所有领域的内部一致性都足够(克朗巴赫的 alpha 值在 0.64 到 0.93 之间)。项目与量表之间的相关系数显示出项目与其领域得分之间的可接受关联(均>0.30),其中“血便”(r=0.37)和“乳房问题”(r=0.32)的得分最低。验证性和探索性因子分析证实了 EPIC-26 的五维度结构(比较拟合指数 0.95)。

结论

心理测量评估表明,EPIC-26 的德语版本是一种良好的结构工具,可用于测量前列腺癌患者的健康相关症状。

相似文献

1
Psychometric validation of the German version of the EPIC-26 questionnaire for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.对局部和局部晚期前列腺癌患者使用的 EPIC-26 问卷德语版进行心理计量学验证。
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02949-7. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26-item version (EPIC-26).挪威版26项扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC - 26)的心理测量测试。
Scand J Urol. 2016 Aug;50(4):280-5. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2016.1163617. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite questionnaire for health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients.前列腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的扩展前列腺癌指数综合问卷法语版的跨文化调适与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Dec 6;14(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0571-y.
4
Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26.《扩展前列腺癌指数复合量表-26 西班牙版本的心理计量验证》
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3511-3518. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04691-7. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
5
The German version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC): translation, validation and minimal important difference estimation.《扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)》的德文版:翻译、验证和最小重要差值估计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 20;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0859-1.
6
Portuguese version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP): psychometric validation and prospective application for early functional outcomes at a single institution.《临床实践中扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC-CP)的葡萄牙语版本:在单家医疗机构中的心理测量学验证和早期功能结局的前瞻性应用》。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00734-y.
7
Validation of the Italian version of the abbreviated expanded prostate Cancer index composite (EPIC-26) in men with prostate Cancer.验证中文版简化扩展前列腺癌指数复合量表(EPIC-26)在前列腺癌患者中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Aug 29;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1214-x.
8
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors.开发和验证扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表的简化版,用于测量前列腺癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量。
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
9
Health-related quality of life in men with localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: validation of an abbreviated version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice in Spain.西班牙临床实践中应用扩展前列腺癌指数复合量表简表评估局限性前列腺癌放疗患者的健康相关生活质量:验证研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 25;19(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01856-z.
10
Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)的开发与验证,用于全面评估前列腺癌男性患者的健康相关生活质量。
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision regret after external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer.前列腺癌外照射放疗和高剂量率近距离放疗后增强治疗的决策遗憾
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 9;43(1):220. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05615-3.
2
Transforming a Large-Scale Prostate Cancer Outcomes Dataset to the OMOP Common Data Model-Experiences from a Scientific Data Holder's Perspective.从科学数据持有者的角度看,将大规模前列腺癌结局数据集转换为OMOP通用数据模型的经验
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2069. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112069.
3
Prolonged indwelling catheter time after RARP does not lead to follow-up surgery.
RARP 后留置导尿管时间延长不会导致后续手术。
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 18;42(1):379. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05080-4.
4
Individualized center-based analysis of urinary and sexual functional outcome after radical prostatectomy based on the prostate cancer outcome study: a post hoc pathway to patient outcome measurement analysis for quality improvement.基于前列腺癌结局研究的前列腺癌根治术后泌尿和性功能结局的个体化中心分析:一种用于质量改进的患者结局测量分析的事后途径。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 15;42(1):236. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04950-1.
5
Prediction models of incontinence and sexual function one year after radical prostatectomy based on data from 20 164 prostate cancer patients.基于 20164 例前列腺癌患者数据的根治性前列腺切除术后 1 年尿失禁和性功能预测模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):e0295179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295179. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26.《扩展前列腺癌指数复合量表-26 西班牙版本的心理计量验证》
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3511-3518. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04691-7. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
[Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer-data from 17,149 patients from 125 certified centers].[前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁——来自125个认证中心的17149例患者的数据]
Urologie. 2024 Jan;63(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02197-z. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Patient's Desire and Real Availability Concerning Supportive Measures Accompanying Radical Prostatectomy: Differences between Certified Prostate Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Centers Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes within the Cross-Sectional Study Improve.前列腺癌根治术相关支持性措施的患者意愿与实际可及性:基于横断面研究中患者报告结局的认证前列腺癌中心与非认证中心的差异
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 19;15(10):2830. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102830.
9
[The interoperability of IIEF-5 with EPIC-26 : Sexual function after radical prostatectomy].[国际勃起功能指数-5(IIEF-5)与前列腺癌根治术后性功能量表(EPIC-26)的互操作性]
Urologie. 2023 Jun;62(6):602-608. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02027-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Patients Regret Their Choice of Therapy Significantly Less Frequently after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy as Opposed to Open Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-Reported Results of the Multicenter Cross-Sectional IMPROVE Study.与开放性根治性前列腺切除术相比,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者显著较少后悔其治疗选择:多中心横断面IMPROVE研究的患者报告结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 30;14(21):5356. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215356.