Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
University of Iowa Iowa City IA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013229. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013229. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Background Current treatment guidelines strongly recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention. However, it remains unclear whether patients' perceptions of cardiovascular risk, beliefs on cholesterol, or the intensity of prescribed statin therapy differs for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) versus cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) versus both CAD and CeVD (CAD&CeVD). Methods and Results The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry collected data on statin use, intensity, and core laboratory low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for 3232 secondary prevention patients treated at 133 US clinics. Among individuals with CeVD only (n=403), CAD only (n=2202), and CeVD&CAD (n=627), no significant differences were observed in patient-perceived cardiovascular disease risk, beliefs on cholesterol lowering, or perceived effectiveness and safety of statin therapy. However, patients with CeVD only were less likely to receive any statin therapy (76.2% versus 86.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.91), or guideline-recommended statin intensity (34.6% versus 50.4%; adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) than those with CAD only. Individuals with CeVD only were also less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL (59.2% versus 69.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99) than individuals with CAD alone. There were no significant differences in the use of any statin therapy or guideline-recommended statin intensity between individuals with CAD&CeVD and those with CAD only. Conclusions Despite lack of significant differences in patient-perceived cardiovascular risk or statin beliefs, patients with CeVD were significantly less likely to receive higher intensity statin or achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL than those with CAD only.
背景 当前的治疗指南强烈推荐使用他汀类药物进行二级预防。然而,对于冠心病(CAD)、脑血管疾病(CeVD)或 CAD 和 CeVD 并存(CAD&CeVD)患者,其对心血管风险的认知、对胆固醇的信念或所开他汀类药物治疗的强度是否存在差异仍不清楚。
方法和结果 PALM(患者和提供者脂质管理评估)登记处收集了 133 家美国诊所治疗的 3232 例二级预防患者的他汀类药物使用、强度和核心实验室低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的数据。在仅有 CeVD(n=403)、仅有 CAD(n=2202)和 CAD&CeVD(n=627)的个体中,患者对心血管疾病风险的感知、对降胆固醇的信念以及对他汀类药物治疗的有效性和安全性的感知没有显著差异。然而,仅有 CeVD 的患者接受任何他汀类药物治疗的可能性较小(76.2%比 86.2%;调整后的优势比 0.64,95%置信区间 0.45-0.91),或接受指南推荐的他汀类药物强度治疗的可能性较小(34.6%比 50.4%;调整后的优势比 0.60,95%置信区间 0.45-0.81)。仅有 CeVD 的患者也不太可能达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇<100mg/dL(59.2%比 69.7%;调整后的优势比 0.79,95%置信区间 0.64-0.99)比仅有 CAD 的患者。CAD&CeVD 患者与仅有 CAD 的患者在使用任何他汀类药物治疗或指南推荐的他汀类药物强度治疗方面无显著差异。
结论 尽管患者对心血管风险或他汀类药物信念没有显著差异,但与仅有 CAD 的患者相比,CeVD 患者接受高强度他汀类药物治疗或达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇<100mg/dL 的可能性显著降低。