• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌血运重建的比较成本:经皮腔内血管成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植术。

Comparative cost of myocardial revascularization: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery.

作者信息

Kelly M E, Taylor G J, Moses H W, Mikell F L, Dove J T, Batchelder J E, Wellons H A, Schneider J A

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jan;5(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80079-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80079-6
PMID:3155456
Abstract

A consecutive series of 78 patients having percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for single vessel coronary artery disease and 85 patients having single vessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery were followed up prospectively for 1 year. Days in hospital and angiographic and revascularization procedures were counted in the two groups of patients and total cost of care for 12 months was calculated using current billing levels. Angioplasty was initially successful in 74% of patients; because of initial failure in 26% and late restenosis in 18%, bypass surgery was ultimately needed in 23 of 78 patients having coronary angioplasty. Nevertheless, total cost of care per patient was 43% lower for those having angioplasty as an initial procedure for single vessel coronary artery disease.

摘要

对78例因单支冠状动脉疾病接受经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的患者以及85例接受单支冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者进行了为期1年的前瞻性随访。统计了两组患者的住院天数、血管造影和血运重建程序,并根据当前计费水平计算了12个月的总护理费用。血管成形术最初在74%的患者中取得成功;由于26%的患者最初手术失败以及18%的患者出现后期再狭窄,78例接受冠状动脉成形术的患者中有23例最终需要进行搭桥手术。然而,对于那些将血管成形术作为单支冠状动脉疾病初始治疗方法的患者,每位患者的总护理费用要低43%。

相似文献

1
Comparative cost of myocardial revascularization: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery.心肌血运重建的比较成本:经皮腔内血管成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jan;5(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80079-6.
2
Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group.阿根廷多支血管病变患者经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术对比的随机试验(ERACI):住院结果及1年随访。ERACI研究组
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90416-x.
3
Is percutaneous coronary angioplasty less expensive than bypass surgery?经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术比搭桥手术费用更低吗?
N Engl J Med. 1984 Nov 1;311(18):1157-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411013111805.
4
Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.随机接受冠状动脉血管成形术或冠状动脉搭桥手术后的医疗费用及生活质量。冠状动脉搭桥术血管成形术血运重建研究(BARI)调查组。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 9;336(2):92-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701093360203.
5
Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with single-vessel bypass.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与单支血管搭桥术疗效的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Jan;89(1):35-41.
6
Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉疾病的血运重建治疗。冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1995;22(2):145-61.
7
Comparative costs of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病中行经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的成本比较
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Oct 1;62(10 Pt 1):809-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91228-3.
8
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after initially successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a review of 17 years experience.初次成功的经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG):17年经验回顾
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Feb;23(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00764-9.
9
Clinical correlates of the initial and long-term cost of coronary bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉搭桥手术和冠状动脉血管成形术初始及长期费用的临床相关因素。
Am Heart J. 1999 Aug;138(2 Pt 1):376-83. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70128-6.
10
Trends in invasive treatment of single-vessel and double-vessel coronary disease.单支血管和双支血管冠心病侵入性治疗的趋势
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 May;95(5):773-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Is a US analysis of cost-effectiveness in interventional cardiology relevant to a centrally funded health care system?美国对介入心脏病学成本效益的分析与中央资助的医疗保健系统相关吗?
Heart. 1997 Oct;78 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10-1. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.suppl_2.10.
2
A primer of biostatistic and economic methods for diagnostic and prognostic modeling in nuclear cardiology: Part II.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1997 Jan-Feb;4(1 Pt 1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(97)90049-0.
3
The invasive management of angina: issues for consumers and commissioners.心绞痛的侵入性治疗:面向消费者和医疗服务采购者的问题
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):335-43. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.4.335.
4
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients 70 years of age or older: 12 years' experience.70岁及以上患者的经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术:12年经验
Br Heart J. 1995 Sep;74(3):310-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.3.310.
5
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: state of the art and future directions.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术:现状与未来方向。
Int J Card Imaging. 1985;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01884103.
6
Outcome in patients with recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty.经皮腔内球囊血管成形术后复发性再狭窄患者的预后
Br Heart J. 1989 Jun;61(6):485-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.61.6.485.
7
Immediate and long term results of percutaneous coronary angioplasty in patients aged 70 and over.70岁及以上患者经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术的近期和远期结果
Br Heart J. 1992 Feb;67(2):138-43. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.2.138.