• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术比搭桥手术费用更低吗?

Is percutaneous coronary angioplasty less expensive than bypass surgery?

作者信息

Reeder G S, Krishan I, Nobrega F T, Naessens J, Kelly M, Christianson J B, McAfee M K

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1984 Nov 1;311(18):1157-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411013111805.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198411013111805
PMID:6237261
Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is widely considered to be an acceptable and less expensive alternative to bypass surgery in carefully selected patients. We compared expenditures related to cardiac care for 79 unselected patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with expenditures for 89 unselected patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery without a previous attempt at angioplasty. All the patients had single-vessel disease. The mean aggregate one-year monetary outlay was 15 per cent lower in the angioplasty group than in the bypass-surgery group. A major component of the expense of angioplasty was the treatment of restenosis in the 33 per cent of patients in this group in whom this late complication occurred. We conclude that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has potential for reducing expenditures for cardiac revascularization and that a further reduction may be obtainable when the rates of restenosis are improved.

摘要

经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术被广泛认为是在精心挑选的患者中,替代搭桥手术的一种可接受且成本较低的方法。我们比较了79例未经挑选接受冠状动脉成形术患者的心脏护理费用,与89例未经挑选、未曾尝试过成形术而接受择期冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的费用。所有患者均为单支血管病变。成形术组的平均一年总支出比搭桥手术组低15%。成形术费用的一个主要组成部分是该组33%发生这种晚期并发症的患者的再狭窄治疗费用。我们得出结论,经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术有降低心脏血运重建费用的潜力,并且当再狭窄发生率降低时,可能会进一步降低费用。

相似文献

1
Is percutaneous coronary angioplasty less expensive than bypass surgery?经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术比搭桥手术费用更低吗?
N Engl J Med. 1984 Nov 1;311(18):1157-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411013111805.
2
Trends in invasive treatment of single-vessel and double-vessel coronary disease.单支血管和双支血管冠心病侵入性治疗的趋势
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 May;95(5):773-81.
3
Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.随机接受冠状动脉血管成形术或冠状动脉搭桥手术后的医疗费用及生活质量。冠状动脉搭桥术血管成形术血运重建研究(BARI)调查组。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 9;336(2):92-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701093360203.
4
Early and late results of coronary artery bypass after failed angioplasty. Actuarial analysis of late cardiac events and comparison with initially successful angioplasty.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Aug;96(2):191-7.
5
A comparison of patient charges associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与冠状动脉旁路移植术相关患者费用的比较。
Am Surg. 1994 Jan;60(1):56-8.
6
Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with single-vessel bypass.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与单支血管搭桥术疗效的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Jan;89(1):35-41.
7
Coronary artery bypass surgery after failed elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A status report.择期经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后的冠状动脉搭桥手术。一份现状报告。
Circulation. 1989 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):I126-31.
8
Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators.与球囊血管成形术相比,支架置入术用于阻塞性冠状动脉搭桥移植血管。大隐静脉初发试验研究者。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 11;337(11):740-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709113371103.
9
The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses.药物、血管成形术或手术研究(MASS):一项针对单一近端左前降支动脉狭窄进行药物治疗、球囊血管成形术或搭桥手术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Dec;26(7):1600-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00384-3.
10
Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.微创冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术联合治疗双支冠状动脉疾病:一种新型杂交手术与“体外循环”双旁路移植术的两年随访
Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):563-70. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118466.

引用本文的文献

1
Is a US analysis of cost-effectiveness in interventional cardiology relevant to a centrally funded health care system?美国对介入心脏病学成本效益的分析与中央资助的医疗保健系统相关吗?
Heart. 1997 Oct;78 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10-1. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.suppl_2.10.
2
The invasive management of angina: issues for consumers and commissioners.心绞痛的侵入性治疗:面向消费者和医疗服务采购者的问题
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):335-43. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.4.335.
3
Government health policy and the diffusion of new medical devices.政府卫生政策与新医疗设备的推广
Health Serv Res. 1986 Dec;21(5):681-711.
4
Current place of coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉血管成形术的当前状况
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Mar 30;290(6473):954-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6473.954.
5
Ten year follow up of patients with single vessel coronary artery disease that was suitable for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.适合经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的单支冠状动脉疾病患者的十年随访
Br Heart J. 1988 Mar;59(3):275-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.59.3.275.
6
Coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉血管成形术
Postgrad Med J. 1987 May;63(739):327-35. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.63.739.327.
7
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: state of the art and future directions.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术:现状与未来方向。
Int J Card Imaging. 1985;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01884103.
8
Outcome in patients with recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty.经皮腔内球囊血管成形术后复发性再狭窄患者的预后
Br Heart J. 1989 Jun;61(6):485-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.61.6.485.
9
Coronary artery bypass grafting: how much does it cost?冠状动脉搭桥术:费用是多少?
CMAJ. 1992 Jan 15;146(2):163-8.