Ruben L N, Buenafe A, Oliver S, Malley A, Barr K, Lukas D
Immunology. 1985 Jan;54(1):65-70.
Studies were carried out on suppressor function in the amphibian Xenopus laevis, the South African clawed toad. Suppression by the thymus of haemagglutinin (HA) production by spleen is antigen-dependent, partially specific and not MHC-restricted in this species (Ruben, Buenafe & Seivert, 1983). Three questions were considered in this study. Does the thymus effect suppression by stimulating peripheralized spleen effector cells, or do effector cells reside within the thymus? Do macrophages participate in the induction and/or expression of thymus-dependent suppressor function? Can thymus suppressor and helper functions be distinguished by using irradiation treatment? The capacity of immunized thymus to suppress HA when co-cultured with spleen fragments from immunized, cyclophosphamide (CyP)-injected animals was tested. Immunized thymus failed to suppress the high levels of HA production by spleen fragments from CyP-treated, immunized donors. Colloidal carbon injection resulted in blockade of macrophage function, and both the capacity of thymuses to suppress and of spleens to be suppressed in co-cultures. Finally, the effect of thymus exposure to gamma-irradiation in vitro was tested using autogeneic thymus/spleen combinations. This enabled the visualization of thymic helper function, which is MHC-restricted in Xenopus (Bernard et al., 1981). Four dosages of irradiation were tested after antigen challenge. The highest HA titres were produced by spleen co-cultures with thymuses which had received 1000 rads. We conclude that suppression of HA production in spleen is not the result of thymus suppressor effector cells, but that suppressor function is mediated by thymus inducer cells which stimulate suppressor effectors in spleen. Both the thymic inducers and effectors in the spleen are sensitive to CyP and macrophage blockade. Our studies further suggest that we are able to distinguish between the thymic functions of help and suppression in Xenopus by taking advantage of their differential sensitivities to irradiation. While it has been postulated, on other grounds, that suppression was one of the earliest thymic regulatory functions to have evolved (L.N. Ruben & R.H. Clothier, submitted), here we suggest the presence of sequential activities of more than one cellular subset, as early in evolution as the primitive anuran (tail-less) amphibia.
对南非爪蟾(非洲爪蟾)这一两栖动物的抑制功能进行了研究。在该物种中,胸腺对脾脏产生血凝素(HA)的抑制作用是抗原依赖性的、部分特异性的且不受主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)限制(鲁本、布埃纳费和西弗特,1983年)。本研究考虑了三个问题。胸腺是通过刺激外周化的脾脏效应细胞来发挥抑制作用,还是效应细胞存在于胸腺内?巨噬细胞是否参与胸腺依赖性抑制功能的诱导和/或表达?能否通过辐射处理来区分胸腺的抑制功能和辅助功能?测试了免疫后的胸腺与来自经环磷酰胺(CyP)注射的免疫动物的脾脏片段共培养时抑制HA的能力。免疫后的胸腺未能抑制来自经CyP处理的免疫供体的脾脏片段产生的高水平HA。注射胶体碳导致巨噬细胞功能受阻,以及胸腺在共培养中的抑制能力和脾脏的被抑制能力均受阻。最后,使用自体胸腺/脾脏组合测试了体外γ射线照射胸腺的效果。这使得能够观察到胸腺的辅助功能,在爪蟾中该功能是受MHC限制的(伯纳德等人,1981年)。在抗原激发后测试了四种辐射剂量。脾脏与接受1000拉德辐射的胸腺共培养产生的HA滴度最高。我们得出结论,脾脏中HA产生的抑制不是胸腺抑制效应细胞的结果,而是抑制功能由胸腺诱导细胞介导,胸腺诱导细胞刺激脾脏中的抑制效应细胞。胸腺诱导细胞和脾脏中的效应细胞对CyP和巨噬细胞阻断均敏感。我们的研究进一步表明,利用爪蟾对辐射的不同敏感性,我们能够区分其胸腺的辅助功能和抑制功能。虽然基于其他理由推测抑制是最早进化的胸腺调节功能之一(L.N.鲁本和R.H.克洛西尔,待提交),但在这里我们表明,早在原始无尾两栖动物进化阶段就存在不止一个细胞亚群的顺序活动。