Brasil Sergio, Bor-Seng-Shu Edson, de-Lima-Oliveira Marcelo, Taccone Fabio Silvio, Gattás Gabriel, Nunes Douglas Mendes, Gomes de Oliveira Raphael A, Martins Tomazini Bruno, Tierno Paulo Fernando, Becker Rafael Akira, Bassi Estevão, Sá Malbouisson Luiz Marcelo, da Silva Paiva Wellingson, Teixeira Manoel Jacobsen, de Carvalho Nogueira Ricardo
Departments of1Neurology and.
4Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
J Neurosurg. 2019 Sep 27;133(4):1220-1228. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.JNS191107. Print 2020 Oct 1.
The present study was designed to answer several concerns disclosed by systematic reviews indicating no evidence to support the use of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of brain death (BD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CTA for the diagnosis of BD and to define the optimal tomographic criteria of intracranial circulatory arrest.
A unicenter, prospective, observational case-control study was undertaken. Comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 5), even those presenting with the first signs of BD, were included. CTA scanning of arterial and venous vasculature and transcranial Doppler (TCD) were performed. A neurological determination of BD and consequently determination of case (BD group) or control (no-BD group) was conducted. All personnel involved with assessing patients were blinded to further tests results. Accuracy of BD diagnosis determined by using CTA was calculated based on the criteria of bilateral absence of visualization of the internal cerebral veins and the distal middle cerebral arteries, the 4-point score (4PS), and an exclusive criterion of absence of deep brain venous drainage as indicated by the absence of deep venous opacification on CTA, the venous score (VS), which considers only the internal cerebral veins bilaterally.
A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this study; 52 patients did not have BD, and none of these patients had circulatory arrest observed by CTA or TCD (100% specificity). Of the 54 patients with a clinical diagnosis of BD, 33 met the 4PS (61.1% sensitivity), whereas 47 met the VS (87% sensitivity). The accuracy of CTA was time related, with greater accuracy when scanning was performed less than 12 hours prior to the neurological assessment, reaching 95.5% sensitivity with the VS.
CTA can reliably support a diagnosis of BD. The criterion of the absence of deep venous opacification, which can be assessed by use of the VS criteria investigated in this study, can confirm the occurrence of cerebral circulatory arrest.Clinical trial registration no.: 12500913400000068 (clinicaltrials.gov).
本研究旨在回答系统评价中提出的几个问题,这些评价表明没有证据支持使用计算机断层血管造影(CTA)诊断脑死亡(BD)。因此,本研究的目的是评估CTA诊断BD的有效性,并确定颅内循环停止的最佳断层扫描标准。
进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性病例对照研究。纳入昏迷患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤5),即使是那些出现BD最初体征的患者。对动脉和静脉血管系统进行CTA扫描,并进行经颅多普勒(TCD)检查。进行BD的神经学判定,从而确定病例(BD组)或对照(非BD组)。所有参与评估患者的人员均对进一步的检查结果不知情。根据双侧大脑内静脉和大脑中动脉远端未显影的标准、4分评分(4PS)以及CTA上未出现深部脑静脉引流的排他性标准(即深部静脉未显影)计算使用CTA确定BD诊断的准确性,静脉评分(VS)仅考虑双侧大脑内静脉。
本研究共纳入106例患者;52例患者未发生BD,这些患者中没有一例通过CTA或TCD观察到循环停止(特异性100%)。在54例临床诊断为BD的患者中,33例符合4PS(敏感性61.1%),而47例符合VS(敏感性87%)。CTA的准确性与时间相关,在神经学评估前不到12小时进行扫描时准确性更高,采用VS时敏感性达到95.5%。
CTA能够可靠地支持BD的诊断。本研究中通过VS标准评估的深部静脉未显影标准可以确认脑循环停止的发生。临床试验注册号:12500913400000068(clinicaltrials.gov)。