Suppr超能文献

计算机断层血管造影评分系统与颅骨缺损在脑死亡确认中的作用。

Computed tomography angiography scoring systems and the role of skull defects in the confirmation of brain death.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Patras GR, 265 04, Patras, Greece.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Patras GR, 265 04, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;11(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94763-8.

Abstract

To assess and compare all current computed tomography angiography (CTA) scoring systems for the diagnostic workup of brain death (BD) to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and clinical tests. Fifty-two patients with a clinical suspicion of BD underwent CTA and subsequently DSA. The diagnostic performance of all current CTA scoring systems was compared to that of DSA, in all patients with a suspicion of BD. A comparison to clinical tests was made only in DSA-positive for BD patients (n = 49), since in DSA-negative BD patients (n = 3) clinical tests were not performed. Further subgroup analysis was performed in relation to skull defects (SDs) stratification. Statistical analysis was conducted by applying statistics-contingency tables, Cochran's-Q test and McNemar's test. The CTA -10, and -7- and all 4-point scoring systems, showed overall sensitivities of 81,6%, 87.8% and 95.9% respectively and 100% specificity, when compared to DSA. In patients with a clinical verification of BD, the CTA -10 and -7-point scoring systems were significantly inferior to clinical tests (p = 0.004 and p = 0.031), while the 4-point scoring systems showed no such difference (p = 0.5). All 4-point scoring systems showed 100% sensitivity in patients with a minor SD or no SD. In patients with a major SD, all CTA scoring systems (- 10, - 7- and all 4-point) were less sensitive (62.5%, 62.5% and 75% respectively). The presence of a major SD was associated with an 8 × relative risk for false negative results in all 4-point scoring systems. CTA showed excellent diagnostic performance in patients with a suspicion of BD. The 4-point CTA scoring systems are the most sensitive for the diagnosis of BD, although in patients with a major SD patient, the role of CTA is ambiguous.

摘要

评估和比较所有当前的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)评分系统,用于诊断脑死亡(BD)的数字减影血管造影(DSA)和临床检查。52 名临床怀疑 BD 的患者接受了 CTA 检查,随后进行了 DSA 检查。在所有怀疑 BD 的患者中,比较了所有当前 CTA 评分系统与 DSA 的诊断性能。仅在 DSA 阳性的 BD 患者(n=49)中进行了与临床检查的比较,因为在 DSA 阴性的 BD 患者(n=3)中未进行临床检查。进一步进行了与颅骨缺损(SD)分层相关的亚组分析。通过应用统计学列联表、Cochran-Q 检验和 McNemar 检验进行统计分析。与 DSA 相比,CTA-10、-7 和所有 4 分制评分系统的总体敏感性分别为 81.6%、87.8%和 95.9%,特异性为 100%。在临床确诊为 BD 的患者中,CTA-10 和-7 分制评分系统明显劣于临床检查(p=0.004 和 p=0.031),而 4 分制评分系统无此差异(p=0.5)。所有 4 分制评分系统在 SD 较小或无 SD 的患者中均具有 100%的敏感性。在 SD 较大的患者中,所有 CTA 评分系统(-10、-7 和所有 4 分)的敏感性均较低(分别为 62.5%、62.5%和 75%)。在所有 4 分制评分系统中,SD 较大的患者发生假阴性结果的相对风险为 8 倍。CTA 在怀疑 BD 的患者中具有出色的诊断性能。4 分制 CTA 评分系统对 BD 的诊断最敏感,尽管在 SD 较大的患者中,CTA 的作用仍不明确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5608/8302591/524c76a5b58a/41598_2021_94763_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验