Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Patras GR, 265 04, Patras, Greece.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Patras GR, 265 04, Patras, Greece.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;11(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94763-8.
To assess and compare all current computed tomography angiography (CTA) scoring systems for the diagnostic workup of brain death (BD) to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and clinical tests. Fifty-two patients with a clinical suspicion of BD underwent CTA and subsequently DSA. The diagnostic performance of all current CTA scoring systems was compared to that of DSA, in all patients with a suspicion of BD. A comparison to clinical tests was made only in DSA-positive for BD patients (n = 49), since in DSA-negative BD patients (n = 3) clinical tests were not performed. Further subgroup analysis was performed in relation to skull defects (SDs) stratification. Statistical analysis was conducted by applying statistics-contingency tables, Cochran's-Q test and McNemar's test. The CTA -10, and -7- and all 4-point scoring systems, showed overall sensitivities of 81,6%, 87.8% and 95.9% respectively and 100% specificity, when compared to DSA. In patients with a clinical verification of BD, the CTA -10 and -7-point scoring systems were significantly inferior to clinical tests (p = 0.004 and p = 0.031), while the 4-point scoring systems showed no such difference (p = 0.5). All 4-point scoring systems showed 100% sensitivity in patients with a minor SD or no SD. In patients with a major SD, all CTA scoring systems (- 10, - 7- and all 4-point) were less sensitive (62.5%, 62.5% and 75% respectively). The presence of a major SD was associated with an 8 × relative risk for false negative results in all 4-point scoring systems. CTA showed excellent diagnostic performance in patients with a suspicion of BD. The 4-point CTA scoring systems are the most sensitive for the diagnosis of BD, although in patients with a major SD patient, the role of CTA is ambiguous.
评估和比较所有当前的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)评分系统,用于诊断脑死亡(BD)的数字减影血管造影(DSA)和临床检查。52 名临床怀疑 BD 的患者接受了 CTA 检查,随后进行了 DSA 检查。在所有怀疑 BD 的患者中,比较了所有当前 CTA 评分系统与 DSA 的诊断性能。仅在 DSA 阳性的 BD 患者(n=49)中进行了与临床检查的比较,因为在 DSA 阴性的 BD 患者(n=3)中未进行临床检查。进一步进行了与颅骨缺损(SD)分层相关的亚组分析。通过应用统计学列联表、Cochran-Q 检验和 McNemar 检验进行统计分析。与 DSA 相比,CTA-10、-7 和所有 4 分制评分系统的总体敏感性分别为 81.6%、87.8%和 95.9%,特异性为 100%。在临床确诊为 BD 的患者中,CTA-10 和-7 分制评分系统明显劣于临床检查(p=0.004 和 p=0.031),而 4 分制评分系统无此差异(p=0.5)。所有 4 分制评分系统在 SD 较小或无 SD 的患者中均具有 100%的敏感性。在 SD 较大的患者中,所有 CTA 评分系统(-10、-7 和所有 4 分)的敏感性均较低(分别为 62.5%、62.5%和 75%)。在所有 4 分制评分系统中,SD 较大的患者发生假阴性结果的相对风险为 8 倍。CTA 在怀疑 BD 的患者中具有出色的诊断性能。4 分制 CTA 评分系统对 BD 的诊断最敏感,尽管在 SD 较大的患者中,CTA 的作用仍不明确。