Suppr超能文献

从分诊到使用抗生素的时间延迟与 1 小时抗生素使用要求的可行性:一项急诊科脓毒症质量改进数据库的分析。

Antibiotic Delays and Feasibility of a 1-Hour-From-Triage Antibiotic Requirement: Analysis of an Emergency Department Sepsis Quality Improvement Database.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;75(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We identify factors associated with delayed emergency department (ED) antibiotics and determine feasibility of a 1-hour-from-triage antibiotic requirement in sepsis.

METHODS

We studied all ED adult septic patients in accordance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock National Quality Measures in 2 consecutive 12-month intervals. During the second interval, a quality improvement intervention was conducted: a sepsis screening protocol plus case-specific feedback to clinicians. Data were abstracted retrospectively through electronic query and chart review. Primary outcomes were antibiotic delay greater than 3 hours from documented onset of hypoperfusion (per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock National Quality Measures) and antibiotic delay greater than 1 hour from triage (per 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations).

RESULTS

We identified 297 and 357 septic patients before and during the quality improvement intervention, respectively. Before and during quality improvement intervention, antibiotic delay in accordance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services measures occurred in 30% and 21% of cases (-9% [95% confidence interval -16% to -2%]); and in accordance with 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations, 85% and 71% (-14% [95% confidence interval -20% to -8%]). Four factors were independently associated with both definitions of antibiotic delay: vague (ie, nonexplicitly infectious) presenting symptoms, triage location to nonacute areas, care before the quality improvement intervention, and lower Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment scores. Most patients did not receive antibiotics within 1 hour of triage, with the exception of a small subset post-quality improvement intervention who presented with explicit infectious symptoms and triage hypotension.

CONCLUSION

The quality improvement intervention significantly reduced antibiotic delays, yet most septic patients did not receive antibiotics within 1 hour of triage. Compliance with the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign would require a wholesale alteration in the management of ED patients with either vague symptoms or absence of triage hypotension.

摘要

研究目的

我们确定了与延迟急诊科(ED)使用抗生素相关的因素,并确定在脓毒症中从分诊起 1 小时内使用抗生素的可行性。

方法

我们按照医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克国家质量措施,在连续两个 12 个月的时间间隔内研究了所有 ED 成年脓毒症患者。在第二个间隔期间,进行了一项质量改进干预措施:脓毒症筛查方案加上针对临床医生的具体反馈。数据通过电子查询和图表审查回顾性地提取。主要结局是从灌注不足的记录开始,抗生素延迟超过 3 小时(根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克国家质量措施)和从分诊开始,抗生素延迟超过 1 小时(根据 2018 年拯救脓毒症运动建议)。

结果

在质量改进干预之前和期间,我们分别确定了 297 例和 357 例脓毒症患者。在质量改进干预之前和期间,根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务措施,抗生素延迟发生在 30%和 21%的病例中(-9%[95%置信区间-16%至-2%]);根据 2018 年拯救脓毒症运动建议,抗生素延迟发生在 85%和 71%的病例中(-14%[95%置信区间-20%至-8%])。有四个因素与两种抗生素延迟定义独立相关:模糊(即不明确的感染)表现症状、分诊到非急性区域、质量改进干预前的治疗和较低的序贯(与脓毒症相关的)器官衰竭评估评分。大多数患者在分诊后 1 小时内没有接受抗生素治疗,除了一小部分在质量改进干预后出现明确感染症状和分诊低血压的患者。

结论

质量改进干预显著减少了抗生素延迟,但大多数脓毒症患者在分诊后 1 小时内未接受抗生素治疗。遵守 2018 年拯救脓毒症运动的建议将需要全面改变对 ED 患者的管理,无论其症状是否模糊或是否存在分诊低血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验