Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hypertens Res. 2019 Dec;42(12):1971-1978. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0327-2. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
In the treatment of resistant hypertension, physiologically individualized therapy based on phenotyping with plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone significantly improves blood pressure control. Patients with a low-renin/low aldosterone (Liddle) phenotype respond best to amiloride, while those with low-renin/high aldosterone respond best to aldosterone antagonists, and those with high renin/high aldosterone (renal phenotype) respond best to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). However, it is important to measure PRA in a stimulated condition to distinguish between low levels due to high salt intake, licorice or nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs and low levels due to suppression by excess aldosterone secretion or renal tubular genetic variants causing retention of salt and water (Liddle phenotype). In the past, both diuretics and angiotensin converting inhibitors (ACEi) have been used for this purpose, and it has been assumed that these classes of drugs are equivalent. In this study of 2896 patients with hypertension, we evaluated that assumption. We found important differences among diuretics alone, ACEi/ARB alone, and ACEi/ARB + diuretics, which all stimulated PRA. However, ACEi/ARB lowers plasma aldosterone, and beta blockers lower PRA. Among patients with systolic pressure ≥ 180 mmHg ± diastolic pressure ≥ 100 mmHg stimulated only by diuretics, the phenotypes were 25% Liddle, 38% IA, 8.7% renal, and 28.3% mixed. In choosing physiologically individualized therapy based on PRA and aldosterone, it is important to consider the classes of stimulating drugs. Phenotypes are best distinguished by taking into account the aldosterone/PRA ratio in addition to the levels of PRA and aldosterone.
在治疗耐药性高血压方面,基于血浆肾素活性 (PRA) 和血浆醛固酮表型的生理个体化治疗可显著改善血压控制。低肾素/低醛固酮 (Liddle) 表型的患者对阿米洛利反应最好,而低肾素/高醛固酮的患者对醛固酮拮抗剂反应最好,高肾素/高醛固酮 (肾表型) 的患者对血管紧张素受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 反应最好。然而,重要的是要在刺激条件下测量 PRA,以区分由于高盐摄入、甘草或非甾体抗炎药引起的低水平和由于过量醛固酮分泌或导致盐和水潴留的肾小管遗传变异引起的低水平 (Liddle 表型)。过去,利尿剂和血管紧张素转换抑制剂 (ACEi) 都曾用于此目的,并且假定这些类别的药物是等效的。在这项针对 2896 名高血压患者的研究中,我们评估了这一假设。我们发现利尿剂单独使用、ACEi/ARB 单独使用以及 ACEi/ARB + 利尿剂均刺激 PRA,但 ACEi/ARB 降低血浆醛固酮,β受体阻滞剂降低 PRA。在仅由利尿剂刺激且收缩压≥180mmHg±舒张压≥100mmHg 的患者中,表型为 25% Liddle、38% IA、8.7% 肾、28.3% 混合。在根据 PRA 和醛固酮选择生理个体化治疗时,重要的是要考虑刺激药物的类别。通过考虑除 PRA 和醛固酮水平外,还要考虑醛固酮/PRA 比值,才能最好地区分表型。