• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状性颈动脉狭窄的管理

Management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Spence J David

机构信息

Neurology & Clinical Pharmacology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1262. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-975.

DOI:10.21037/atm-20-975
PMID:33178794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7607083/
Abstract

Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are at very high risk of coronary events, so they should all receive intensive medical therapy. What is often accepted as "best medical therapy" is usually suboptimal. Truly intensive medical therapy includes lifestyle modification, particularly smoking cessation and a Mediterranean diet. All patients with ACS should receive intensive lipid-lowering therapy, should have their blood pressure well controlled, and should receive B vitamins for lowering of plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) if levels are high; a commonly missed cause of elevated tHcy is metabolic B12 deficiency, which should be diagnosed and treated. Most patients with ACS would be better treated with intensive medical therapy than with either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS). A process called "treating arteries instead of treating risk factors" markedly reduced the risk of ACS in an observational study; a randomized trial usual care should be carried out. The few patients with ACS who could benefit (15%, or perhaps more if recent evidence regarding the risk of intraplaque hemorrhage is borne out) can be identified by a number of features. These include microemboli on transcranial Doppler, intraplaque hemorrhage, reduced cerebrovascular reserve, and echolucency of plaques, particularly "juxtaluminal black plaque". No patient should be subjected to CAS or CEA without evidence of high-risk features, because in most cases the 1-year risk of stroke or death with intervention is higher with either CEA (2%) or CAS (4%) than with intensive medical therapy (0.5%). Most patients, particularly the elderly, would be better treated with CEA than CAS. Most strokes can be prevented in patients with ACS, but truly intensive medical therapy is required.

摘要

无症状性颈动脉狭窄(ACS)患者发生冠状动脉事件的风险非常高,因此他们都应接受强化药物治疗。通常被认为是“最佳药物治疗”的方案往往并不理想。真正的强化药物治疗包括生活方式的改变,尤其是戒烟和采用地中海饮食。所有ACS患者都应接受强化降脂治疗,血压应得到良好控制,如果血浆总同型半胱氨酸(tHcy)水平升高,应补充B族维生素以降低tHcy水平;tHcy升高常见的一个被漏诊原因是代谢性维生素B12缺乏,应予以诊断和治疗。大多数ACS患者接受强化药物治疗比接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或支架置入术(CAS)效果更好。在一项观察性研究中,一种被称为“治疗动脉而非治疗危险因素”的方法显著降低了ACS的风险;应开展一项随机试验对比常规治疗。少数能从治疗中获益的ACS患者(约15%,如果关于斑块内出血风险的最新证据得到证实,获益比例可能更高)可通过一些特征来识别。这些特征包括经颅多普勒检测到的微栓子、斑块内出血、脑血管储备降低以及斑块的低回声,尤其是“管腔旁黑色斑块”。没有高危特征证据的患者不应接受CAS或CEA治疗,因为在大多数情况下,CEA(约2%)或CAS(约4%)干预后1年的卒中或死亡风险高于强化药物治疗(约0.5%)。大多数患者,尤其是老年患者,接受CEA治疗比CAS治疗效果更好。ACS患者的大多数卒中是可以预防的,但需要真正的强化药物治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/f290103c930e/atm-08-19-1262-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/6d25214a9a7f/atm-08-19-1262-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/3710eed3f3f2/atm-08-19-1262-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/f290103c930e/atm-08-19-1262-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/6d25214a9a7f/atm-08-19-1262-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/3710eed3f3f2/atm-08-19-1262-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/7607083/f290103c930e/atm-08-19-1262-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的管理
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1262. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-975.
2
Choosing the right therapy for a patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.为无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者选择合适的治疗方法。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Feb;18(2):53-63. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1729127. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
3
Appropriate management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状颈动脉狭窄的适当管理。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Jun 24;1(2):64-71. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000016. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Transcranial Doppler monitoring for microemboli: a marker of a high-risk carotid plaque.经颅多普勒监测微栓子:高危颈动脉斑块的一个标志物。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):62-66. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Identifying high-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis.识别高危无症状性颈动脉狭窄。
Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2012 Mar;6(2):139-51. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2012.662954. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
6
Endarterectomy vs. stenting vs. medical therapy.动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术及药物治疗的比较
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jul;11(5):500-1. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643552. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
7
Contralateral Stenosis and Echolucent Plaque Morphology are Associated with Elevated Stroke Risk in Patients Treated with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis within a Controlled Clinical Trial (SPACE-2).在一项对照临床试验(SPACE-2)中,接受无症状颈动脉狭窄治疗的患者,对侧狭窄和回声不均匀斑块形态与升高的卒中风险相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105940. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105940. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Effects of intensive medical therapy on microemboli and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis.强化药物治疗对无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者微栓子及心血管风险的影响。
Arch Neurol. 2010 Feb;67(2):180-6. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.289. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
9
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
10
Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly.高龄患者无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.090. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Unstable Plaque is a Treatable Cause of Cognitive Decline.不稳定斑块是认知能力下降的一个可治疗病因。
Med Hypotheses. 2024 Sep;190. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111423. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Effect of aspirin in patients with established asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿司匹林对已确诊的无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 7;13:1041400. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1041400. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness of red yeast rice on carotid atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Interaction of serum vitamin B and folate with genotypes on risk of ischemic stroke.血清维生素 B 和叶酸与基因型相互作用对缺血性脑卒中风险的影响。
Neurology. 2020 Mar 17;94(11):e1126-e1136. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008932. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
The need for clinical judgement in the application of evidence-based medicine.循证医学应用中临床判断的必要性。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):172-177. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111300. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Effect of Vitamin B Levels on the Association Between Folic Acid Treatment and CKD Progression: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Folic Acid Interventional Trial.
红曲米对颈动脉粥样硬化的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 2;13:937809. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.937809. eCollection 2022.
4
3D-Arterial analysis software and CEUS in the assessment of severity and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a comparison with CTA and histopathology.3D 动脉分析软件和 CEUS 在评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的严重程度和易损性方面:与 CTA 和组织病理学的比较。
Radiol Med. 2022 Nov;127(11):1254-1269. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01551-z. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
5
Risk factors for carotid plaque progression after optimising the risk factor treatment: substudy results of the Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics Associated with a Progression Rate of the Plaque and a Risk of Stroke in Patients with the carotid Bifurcation Plaque Study (ANTIQUE).颈动脉斑块进展风险因素的优化治疗后:颈动脉分叉斑块研究(ANTIQUE)中斑块进展率和中风风险相关的斑块特征的亚研究结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022 Apr;7(2):132-139. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001068. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
New insight into biology, molecular diagnostics and treatment options of unstable carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a narrative review.不稳定型颈动脉粥样硬化斑块生物学、分子诊断及治疗选择的新见解:一篇综述
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1207. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7197.
7
Carotid artery stenosis and stroke: controversies in prevention and treatment.颈动脉狭窄与中风:预防和治疗中的争议
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1200. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-149.
维生素 B 水平对叶酸治疗与 CKD 进展之间关联的影响:叶酸干预试验的事后分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Mar;75(3):325-332. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Interpreting stimulated plasma renin and aldosterone to select physiologically individualized therapy for resistant hypertension: importance of the class of stimulating drugs.解读刺激后的血浆肾素和醛固酮以选择抵抗性高血压的生理性个体化治疗:刺激药物类别的重要性。
Hypertens Res. 2019 Dec;42(12):1971-1978. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0327-2. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Effect of 1 or 2 Doses of Inclisiran on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels: One-Year Follow-up of the ORION-1 Randomized Clinical Trial.依洛尤单抗 1 或 2 剂对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响:ORION-1 随机临床试验的 1 年随访结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):1067-1075. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3502.
6
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: High Risk With Suboptimal Treatment: Re: Five Year Outcomes in Men Screened for Carotid Artery Stenosis at 65 Years of Age: A Population Based Cohort Study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;59(1):151. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.035. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
7
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
8
Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study.在来自 21 个高收入、中等收入和低收入国家(PURE)的 155722 人中,可改变的风险因素、心血管疾病和死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):795-808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32008-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
9
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
10
Ezetimibe Lipid-Lowering Trial on Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in 75 or Older (EWTOPIA 75): A Randomized, Controlled Trial.依折麦布降脂预防 75 岁及以上动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病试验(EWTOPIA 75):一项随机对照试验。
Circulation. 2019 Sep 17;140(12):992-1003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039415. Epub 2019 Aug 22.