Suppr超能文献

辐射剂量管理系统集成的 3D 皮肤剂量图与 XR-RV3 Gafchromic®胶片的对比实验评估。

Experimental evaluation of a radiation dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with XR-RV3 Gafchromic® films.

机构信息

Service d'imagerie medicale, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, EA 2415 Nimes, France.

GE Healthcare, DoseWatch, R&D, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2019 Oct;66:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.234. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the interactive Skin Dose Map® tool (SDM) integrated to the radiation dose management system (RDMS) DoseWatch® with Gafchromic® films for implementation in routine practice.

METHODS

A retrospective dose estimation software SDM was used to calculate Peak Skin Dose (PSD) and display the patient skin dose distribution. PSD was calculated with a triangle mesh of 0.055 cm resolution on ICRP 110 male anthropomorphic phantom and with a square ROI of 1 cm on flat phantom. The tool uses Radiation Dose Structured Reports (RDSR) data to model exposure events and calculate the PSD per event. The PSD and the skin dose distribution estimated with SDM were evaluated in comparison with Gafchromic® films positioned under the PMMA phantom (20 cm) for 13 configurations. Measurements were performed on a Philips system. Statistical analysis were carried out to compare PSD and PSD.

RESULTS

Average differences between PSD and PSD were 6% ± 6% (range from -3% to 22%) for flat phantom and 5% ± 7% (range from -3% to 25%) for ICRP phantom. Concordance was good between the measured PSD and the estimated PSD with Lin's coefficient estimation and 95% Confidence Interval of 0.979 [0.875; 0.984] for flat phantom and 0.977 [0.877; 0.985] for ICRP phantom. Dose map representations are concordant for 11 of the 13 tests on PMMA phantom. Disparities arose from the limitations of the RSDR format: table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of wedge filter.

CONCLUSION

The results found in this experimental evaluation show that the SDM is a suitable alternative to Gafchromic® film to calculate PSD.

摘要

目的

评估集成在辐射剂量管理系统(RDMS)DoseWatch®中的 Skin Dose Map®工具(SDM)与 Gafchromic®膜在常规实践中的应用。

方法

使用回顾性剂量估算软件 SDM 计算峰值皮肤剂量(PSD)并显示患者皮肤剂量分布。PSD 是在 ICRP 110 男性人体模型上用 0.055cm 分辨率的三角网格和在平板模型上用 1cm 的正方形 ROI 计算的。该工具使用辐射剂量结构化报告(RDSR)数据来模拟暴露事件并计算每个事件的 PSD。使用 SDM 估算的 PSD 和皮肤剂量分布与放置在 PMMA 模型(20cm)下的 Gafchromic®膜进行比较,共对 13 种配置进行了评估。测量是在飞利浦系统上进行的。进行了统计分析以比较 PSD 和 PSD。

结果

对于平板模型,PSD 和 PSD 之间的平均差异为 6%±6%(范围为-3%至 22%),对于 ICRP 模型为 5%±7%(范围为-3%至 25%)。对于平板模型,Lin 系数估计和 95%置信区间为 0.979 [0.875;0.984],对于 ICRP 模型为 0.977 [0.877;0.985],测量的 PSD 和估计的 PSD 之间的一致性良好。对于 PMMA 模型的 13 次测试中的 11 次,剂量图表示是一致的。差异源于 RDSR 格式的限制:透视事件期间的表格移位和楔形滤光片的使用。

结论

这项实验评估的结果表明,SDM 是计算 PSD 的 Gafchromic®膜的合适替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验