Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Apr;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
The aim was to evaluate the effect on glycaemic control of more intensive care for patients with very uncontrolled type-2 diabetes (HbA1c>10%) at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa.
A pragmatic, quasi-experimental study. Patients with HBA1c>10% were consecutively selected into a 6-month programme of intensified care involving monthly visits to a doctor, diabetes group education, escalation of treatment, and more frequent HbA1c testing by either point-of-care (POC) or laboratory. Participants were their own controls in a retrospective analysis of usual care during the previous year.
At baseline 236 patients had a mean HbA1c of 12.1%. The mean difference in HbA1c in the intervention group was -1.1% (p<0.001). The intervention group were exposed to group diabetes education (100% vs 0%), more visits (3.8 vs 3.2, p<0.001), more HbA1c tests (2.2 vs 0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in increased dose of insulin between the groups or between POC and standard laboratory intervention sub-groups.
The introduction of group diabetes education was the most likely explanation for improved glycaemic control in this poor, under-resourced, public sector, peri-urban setting. The study demonstrates a feasible approach to improving diabetes care in the South African context.
评估在南非开耶利特沙社区卫生中心对血糖控制非常不佳的 2 型糖尿病(HbA1c>10%)患者进行更强化治疗对血糖控制的影响。
这是一项实用的准实验研究。连续选择 HbA1c>10%的患者参加为期 6 个月的强化治疗计划,包括每月就诊医生、糖尿病小组教育、治疗升级以及通过即时检测(POC)或实验室更频繁地检测 HbA1c。参与者是他们自己的对照,对前一年的常规护理进行回顾性分析。
在基线时,236 名患者的平均 HbA1c 为 12.1%。干预组的 HbA1c 平均差值为-1.1%(p<0.001)。干预组接受了小组糖尿病教育(100%比 0%)、更多的就诊次数(3.8 次比 3.2 次,p<0.001)和更多的 HbA1c 检测次数(2.2 次比 0.9 次,p<0.001)。两组之间胰岛素剂量增加没有差异,POC 和标准实验室干预亚组之间也没有差异。
在这个贫困、资源匮乏的城市周边公立部门,引入小组糖尿病教育是血糖控制改善的最可能解释。该研究展示了在南非背景下改善糖尿病护理的可行方法。