Suppr超能文献

南非开耶利察社区卫生中心强化临床护理对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:准实验研究。

The impact of intensified clinical care on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa: Quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Apr;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Abstract

AIM

The aim was to evaluate the effect on glycaemic control of more intensive care for patients with very uncontrolled type-2 diabetes (HbA1c>10%) at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa.

METHODS

A pragmatic, quasi-experimental study. Patients with HBA1c>10% were consecutively selected into a 6-month programme of intensified care involving monthly visits to a doctor, diabetes group education, escalation of treatment, and more frequent HbA1c testing by either point-of-care (POC) or laboratory. Participants were their own controls in a retrospective analysis of usual care during the previous year.

RESULTS

At baseline 236 patients had a mean HbA1c of 12.1%. The mean difference in HbA1c in the intervention group was -1.1% (p<0.001). The intervention group were exposed to group diabetes education (100% vs 0%), more visits (3.8 vs 3.2, p<0.001), more HbA1c tests (2.2 vs 0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in increased dose of insulin between the groups or between POC and standard laboratory intervention sub-groups.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of group diabetes education was the most likely explanation for improved glycaemic control in this poor, under-resourced, public sector, peri-urban setting. The study demonstrates a feasible approach to improving diabetes care in the South African context.

摘要

目的

评估在南非开耶利特沙社区卫生中心对血糖控制非常不佳的 2 型糖尿病(HbA1c>10%)患者进行更强化治疗对血糖控制的影响。

方法

这是一项实用的准实验研究。连续选择 HbA1c>10%的患者参加为期 6 个月的强化治疗计划,包括每月就诊医生、糖尿病小组教育、治疗升级以及通过即时检测(POC)或实验室更频繁地检测 HbA1c。参与者是他们自己的对照,对前一年的常规护理进行回顾性分析。

结果

在基线时,236 名患者的平均 HbA1c 为 12.1%。干预组的 HbA1c 平均差值为-1.1%(p<0.001)。干预组接受了小组糖尿病教育(100%比 0%)、更多的就诊次数(3.8 次比 3.2 次,p<0.001)和更多的 HbA1c 检测次数(2.2 次比 0.9 次,p<0.001)。两组之间胰岛素剂量增加没有差异,POC 和标准实验室干预亚组之间也没有差异。

结论

在这个贫困、资源匮乏的城市周边公立部门,引入小组糖尿病教育是血糖控制改善的最可能解释。该研究展示了在南非背景下改善糖尿病护理的可行方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验