Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Active surveillance (AS) enrolment criteria and follow-up schedules for low-risk prostate cancer vary between institutions. However, uncertainty remains about adherence to these protocols.
To determine adherence to institution-specific AS inclusion criteria and follow-up schedules within the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively assessed the data of 15 101 patients from 25 established AS cohorts worldwide between 2014 and 2016.
Adherence to individual AS inclusion criteria was rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from poor to excellent. Nonadherence to follow-up schedules was defined as absence of repeat biopsy 1 yr after the scheduled date. Cohorts were pooled into annual and Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS)-based biopsy schedules, and a generalised linear mixed model was constructed to test for nonadherence.
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) inclusion criteria were followed in 92%, Gleason score (GS) criteria were followed in 97%, and the number of positive biopsy cores was followed in 94% of men. Both age and tumour stage (T stage) criteria had 99% adherence overall. Pooled nonadherence rates increased over time-8%, 16%, and 34% for annual schedules and 11%, 30%, and 29% for PRIAS-based schedules at 1, 4, and 7 yr, respectively-and did not differ between biopsy schedules. A limitation is that our results do not consider the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
In on-going development of evidence-based AS protocols, variable adherence to PSA and GS inclusion criteria should be considered. Repeat biopsy adherence reduces with increased duration of surveillance, independent of biopsy frequency. This emphasises the importance of risk stratification at the commencement of AS.
We studied adherence to active surveillance protocols for prostate cancer worldwide. We found that inclusion criteria were generally followed well, but adherence to repeat biopsy reduced with time. This should be considered when optimising future active surveillance protocols.
不同机构的低危前列腺癌主动监测(AS)纳入标准和随访方案各不相同。然而,对于这些方案的遵守情况仍存在不确定性。
确定在 Movember 基金会全球前列腺癌主动监测行动计划(GAP3)倡议中,各机构特定的 AS 纳入标准和随访方案的遵守情况。
设计、设置和参与者:我们回顾性评估了 2014 年至 2016 年间全球 25 个已建立的 AS 队列中 15101 名患者的数据。
采用 5 分李克特量表评估单个 AS 纳入标准的遵守情况,范围从差到优。未遵循随访方案定义为在预定日期后 1 年未进行重复活检。队列被分为年度和前列腺癌研究国际:主动监测(PRIAS)为基础的活检方案,并构建了广义线性混合模型来检验不遵守情况。
92%的患者符合血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)纳入标准,97%的患者符合 Gleason 评分(GS)标准,94%的患者符合阳性活检核心数标准。年龄和肿瘤分期(T 分期)标准总体上的符合率均为 99%。随着时间的推移,累积不遵守率增加-年度方案分别为 8%、16%和 34%,PRIAS 方案分别为 11%、30%和 29%,在 1、4 和 7 年时;并且两种活检方案之间没有差异。一个局限性是我们的结果没有考虑使用多参数磁共振成像。
在制定基于证据的 AS 方案的过程中,应考虑到 PSA 和 GS 纳入标准的可变遵守情况。重复活检的遵守率随着监测时间的延长而降低,与活检频率无关。这强调了在开始 AS 时进行风险分层的重要性。
我们研究了全球前列腺癌主动监测方案的遵守情况。我们发现,纳入标准总体上得到了很好的遵守,但随着时间的推移,重复活检的遵守率降低了。在优化未来的主动监测方案时,应考虑到这一点。