Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Pathology Department, Kırıkkale 71000, Turkey.
Pathol Res Pract. 2019 Nov;215(11):152635. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152635. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
Tumour budding (BD) and Tumour stroma ratio (TSR) are considered valuable survival parameters for colon cancer (CC), but it is still unclear whether these parameters predict a poor prognosis. This study aimed to determine the survival effect of TB and TSR in elderly stage I CC patients.
We evaluated these parameters in eighty-eight stage I CC patients who underwent surgical treatment alone between 1998 and 2015. The relationship between these parameters and age was investigated. Model A was used for methodology.
In elderly patients (≥68), these parameters obtained more successful results for following analysis: relationship between prognostic factors [lymphatic invasion (BD, p = 0.003; TSR, p = 0.003), perineural invasion (BD, p = 0.016; TSR, p = 0.004), tumour deposites (BD, p = 0.005; TSR, p = 0.033), MSI (BD, p=0.031; TSR, p=0.012), etc.], correlation of estimates (BD, r=0.724; TSR, r=0.703), and reproducibility of study (BD [Kappa (ĸ)]=0.53-0.75; TSR (ĸ) =0.56-0.71). Also, the cut-off values were useful for BD (area of under ROC (AUC)=0.816 [0.707-0.925]) and TSR (AUC=0.810 [0.697-0.924]). In univariate analysis, in elderly patients, these parameters had a poor 5-year survival for RFS (p<0.001[BD], p=0.001[TSR]), OS (p<0.001[BD], p=0.005[TSR]), and LR (p=0.008[BD], p=0.034[TSR]). Multivariate analysis confirmed that these parameters are independent worse predictors for RFS (BD: 1.42[HR], p=0.002; TSR: 1.50[HR], p=0.001), OS (BD: 1.38[HR], p=0.014; TSR: 1.42[HR], p=0.005), and LR (BD: 1.61[HR], p=0.034) in elderly patients.
Our results confirm that BD and TSR are reliable indexes for poor survival in elderly stage I CC patients. We recommend using model A for successful results and standardization.
肿瘤芽(BD)和肿瘤间质比(TSR)被认为是结肠癌(CC)有价值的生存参数,但这些参数是否能预测预后不良仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定 TB 和 TSR 在老年 I 期 CC 患者中的生存效应。
我们评估了 1998 年至 2015 年间 88 例接受单纯手术治疗的 I 期 CC 患者的这些参数。研究了这些参数与年龄的关系。采用模型 A 进行方法学研究。
在老年患者(≥68 岁)中,这些参数在以下分析中获得了更成功的结果:预后因素的关系[淋巴血管侵犯(BD,p=0.003;TSR,p=0.003),神经周围侵犯(BD,p=0.016;TSR,p=0.004),肿瘤沉积(BD,p=0.005;TSR,p=0.033),微卫星不稳定性(MSI,BD,p=0.031;TSR,p=0.012)等],估计值的相关性(BD,r=0.724;TSR,r=0.703),以及研究的可重复性(BD[Kappa(ĸ)]=0.53-0.75;TSR[ĸ]=0.56-0.71)。此外,在老年患者中,BD(ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)=0.816 [0.707-0.925])和 TSR(AUC=0.810 [0.697-0.924])的截断值是有用的。在单因素分析中,在老年患者中,这些参数对 RFS(p<0.001[BD],p=0.001[TSR])、OS(p<0.001[BD],p=0.005[TSR])和 LR(p=0.008[BD],p=0.034[TSR])的 5 年生存率有不良影响。多因素分析证实,这些参数是 RFS(BD:1.42[HR],p=0.002;TSR:1.50[HR],p=0.001)、OS(BD:1.38[HR],p=0.014;TSR:1.42[HR],p=0.005)和 LR(BD:1.61[HR],p=0.034)的独立预后不良预测因素。
我们的结果证实,BD 和 TSR 是老年 I 期 CC 患者生存不良的可靠指标。我们建议使用模型 A 获得成功的结果和标准化。