Eriksen Ann C, Andersen Johnnie B, Lindebjerg Jan, dePont Christensen René, Hansen Torben F, Kjær-Frifeldt Sanne, Sørensen Flemming B
Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Pathology, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Diagn Pathol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13000-018-0697-9.
Tumour budding (TB) and Tumour Stroma Ratio (TSR) may be rewarding in the treatment stratification of patients with stage II colon cancer. However, lack of standardization may exclude these parameters from being used in a clinical setting. The purpose of this methodologic study was to compare stereology with semi-quantitative estimations of TSR, to investigate the intra-tumoural heterogeneity of TB and TSR, and to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Three paraffin embedded tumour blocks, one of them representing the deepest invasive front, were selected from each of 43 patients treated for stage II colon cancer. TSR was estimated in H&E sections semi-quantitatively using conventional microscopy, and stereologically on scanned slides, using the newCAST stereology platform. TB was scored across 10 high power fields at the invasive front in cytokeratin AE1/AE3 stained sections.
Subjective, semi-quantitative estimates of TSR significantly correlated to the stereological estimates, with the best correlation found for sections with the deepest invasive tumour penetration (σ = 0.621, p < 0.001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate to substantial for both TB (Κappa = 0.46-0.73) and TSR (Κappa = 0.70-0.75). The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for TSR varied from 0.322 based on stereological hotspot estimation to 0.648 for the semi-quantitative evaluation. For TB, ICC varied from 0.646 based on continuous data to 0.698 based on categorical data (cut-off: 10 buds). Thus, the intra-tumoural heterogeneity for both TB and the semi-quantitative estimation of TSR was low.
We recommend using only one tissue section representing the deepest invasive tumour area for estimation of TSR. For TB we recommend using one tissue section; however due to low representation of high-budding tumours, results must be considered with caution.
肿瘤芽生(TB)和肿瘤基质比(TSR)可能有助于II期结肠癌患者的治疗分层。然而,缺乏标准化可能会使这些参数无法应用于临床。本方法学研究的目的是比较体视学与TSR的半定量评估,研究TB和TSR的肿瘤内异质性,并评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
从43例接受II期结肠癌治疗的患者中,各选取3个石蜡包埋的肿瘤块,其中1个代表最深浸润前沿。使用传统显微镜在苏木精-伊红(H&E)切片上对TSR进行半定量评估,并使用新型CAST体视学平台在扫描切片上进行体视学评估。在细胞角蛋白AE1/AE3染色切片的浸润前沿,在10个高倍视野中对TB进行评分。
TSR的主观半定量评估与体视学评估显著相关,在肿瘤浸润最深的切片中相关性最佳(σ = 0.621,p < 0.001)。观察者间对TB(Kappa = 0.46 - 0.73)和TSR(Kappa = 0.70 - 0.75)的一致性为中等至高度。TSR的组内相关系数(ICC)从基于体视学热点估计的0.322到半定量评估的0.648不等。对于TB,ICC从基于连续数据的0.646到基于分类数据(截断值:10个芽)的0.698不等。因此,TB和TSR半定量评估的肿瘤内异质性均较低。
我们建议仅使用一个代表肿瘤最深浸润区域的组织切片来评估TSR。对于TB,我们建议使用一个组织切片;然而,由于高芽生肿瘤的代表性较低,结果必须谨慎考虑。