Suppr超能文献

实施电子会诊(eConsult)以增加专科护理可及性的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述

Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review.

作者信息

Osman Mohamed A, Schick-Makaroff Kara, Thompson Stephanie, Bialy Liza, Featherstone Robin, Kurzawa Julia, Zaidi Deenaz, Okpechi Ikechi, Habib Syed, Shojai Soroush, Jindal Kailash, Braam Branko, Keely Erin, Liddy Clare, Manns Braden, Tonelli Marcello, Hemmelgarn Brenda, Klarenbach Scott, Bello Aminu K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 13;4(5):e001629. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001629. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electronic consultation (eConsult)-provider-to-provider electronic asynchronous exchanges of patient health information at a distance-is emerging as a potential tool to improve the interface between primary care providers and specialists. Despite growing evidence that eConsult has clinical benefits, it is not widely adopted. We investigated factors influencing the adoption and implementation of eConsult services.

METHODS

We applied established methods to guide the review, and the recently published Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews to report our findings. We searched five electronic databases and the grey literature for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles and full texts to identify studies that reported barriers to and/or facilitators of eConsult (asynchronous (store-and-forward) use of telemedicine to exchange patient health information between two providers (primary and secondary) at a distance using secure infrastructure). We extracted data on study characteristics and key barriers and facilitators were analysed thematically and classified using the Quadruple Aim framework taxonomy. No date or language restrictions were applied.

RESULTS

Among the 2579 publications retrieved, 130 studies met eligibility for the review. We identified and summarised key barriers to and facilitators of eConsult adoption and implementation across four domains: provider, patient, healthcare system and cost. Key barriers were increased workload for providers, privacy concerns and insufficient reimbursement for providers. Main facilitators were remote residence location, timely responses from specialists, utilisation of referral coordinators, addressing medicolegal concerns and incentives for providers to use eConsult.

CONCLUSION

There are multiple barriers to and facilitators of eConsult adoption across the domains of Quadruple Aim framework. Our findings will inform the development of practice tools to support the wider adoption and scalability of eConsult implementation.

摘要

引言

电子会诊(eConsult)——即医疗服务提供者之间远程异步交换患者健康信息——正逐渐成为改善初级保健提供者与专科医生之间协作的潜在工具。尽管越来越多的证据表明电子会诊具有临床益处,但它并未得到广泛应用。我们调查了影响电子会诊服务采用和实施的因素。

方法

我们应用既定方法指导文献综述,并采用最近发表的《系统评价与荟萃分析优先报告条目扩展版:范围综述》来报告我们的研究结果。我们在五个电子数据库和灰色文献中搜索相关研究。两名评审员独立筛选标题和全文,以确定报告电子会诊障碍和/或促进因素的研究(通过安全基础设施远程异步(存储转发)使用远程医疗在两个医疗服务提供者(初级和二级)之间交换患者健康信息)。我们提取了关于研究特征的数据,并对关键障碍和促进因素进行了主题分析,并使用四重目标框架分类法进行分类。未设置日期或语言限制。

结果

在检索到的2579篇出版物中,130项研究符合综述的纳入标准。我们确定并总结了电子会诊采用和实施在四个领域的关键障碍和促进因素:医疗服务提供者、患者、医疗保健系统和成本。关键障碍包括医疗服务提供者工作量增加、隐私担忧以及对医疗服务提供者的报销不足。主要促进因素包括居住在偏远地区、专科医生及时回复、转诊协调员的利用、解决法医学问题以及激励医疗服务提供者使用电子会诊。

结论

在四重目标框架的各个领域中,电子会诊的采用存在多种障碍和促进因素。我们的研究结果将为开发实践工具提供参考,以支持电子会诊实施的更广泛采用和可扩展性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00d/6747903/64417ee84299/bmjgh-2019-001629f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验