• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和中国的文化、自我与医疗决策:结构模型分析

Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis.

作者信息

Dolan Hankiz, Alden Dana L, Friend John M, Lee Ping Yein, Lee Yew Kong, Ng Chirk Jenn, Abdullah Khatijah Lim, Trevena Lyndal

机构信息

School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, Hawaii.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Sep 20;4(2):2381468319871018. doi: 10.1177/2381468319871018. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2381468319871018
PMID:31565670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6755644/
Abstract

To explore and compare the influences of individual-level cultural values and personal attitudinal values on the desire for medical information and self-involvement in decision making in Australia and China. A total of 288 and 291 middle-aged adults from Australia and China, respectively, completed an online survey examining cultural and personal values, and their desired level of self-influence on medical decision making. Structural equation modeling was used to test 15 hypotheses relating to the effects of cultural and personal antecedents on the individual desire for influence over medical decision making. Similar factors in both Australia and China (total variance explained: Australia 29%; China 35%) predicted desire for medical information, with interdependence (unstandardized path coefficient β = 0.102, = 0.014; β = 0.215, = 0.001), independence (β = 0.244, < 0.001; β = 0.123, = 0.037), and health locus of control (β = -0.140, = 0.018; β = -0.138, = 0.007) being significant and positive predictors. A desire for involvement in decisions was only predicted by power distance, which had an opposite effect of being negative for Australia and positive for China (total variance explained: Australia 11%; China 5%; β = 0.294, < 0.001; China: β = -0.190, = 0.043). National culture moderated the effect of independence on desire for medical information, which was stronger in Australia than China ( score = 1.687, < 0.05). Study results demonstrate that in both countries, desire for medical information can be influenced by individual-level cultural and personal values, suggesting potential benefits of tailoring health communication to personal mindsets to foster informed decision making. The desired level of self-involvement in decision making was relatively independent of other cultural and personal values in both countries, suggesting caution against cultural stereotypes. Study findings also suggest that involvement preferences in decision making should be considered separately from information needs at the clinical encounter.

摘要

探索并比较个人层面的文化价值观和个人态度价值观对澳大利亚和中国民众医疗信息需求以及自我参与医疗决策程度的影响。分别来自澳大利亚和中国的288名和291名中年成年人完成了一项在线调查,该调查考察了文化和个人价值观,以及他们在医疗决策中期望的自我影响程度。采用结构方程模型检验了15个关于文化和个人因素对个人医疗决策影响力需求影响的假设。澳大利亚和中国的相似因素(总方差解释率:澳大利亚29%;中国35%)预测了对医疗信息的需求,其中相互依存性(非标准化路径系数β = 0.102,p = 0.014;β = 0.215,p = 0.001)、独立性(β = 0.244,p < 0.001;β = 0.123,p = 0.037)和健康控制点(β = -0.140,p = 0.018;β = -0.138,p = 0.007)是显著且正向的预测因素。只有权力距离预测了参与决策的意愿,其对澳大利亚的影响为负,对中国的影响为正(总方差解释率:澳大利亚11%;中国5%;β = 0.294,p < 0.001;中国:β = -0.190,p = 0.043)。国家文化调节了独立性对医疗信息需求的影响,在澳大利亚比在中国更强(z得分 = 1.687,p < 0.05)。研究结果表明,在两国,对医疗信息的需求都可能受到个人层面文化和个人价值观的影响,这表明根据个人思维模式调整健康传播以促进明智决策可能具有潜在益处。在两国,决策中期望的自我参与程度相对独立于其他文化和个人价值观,这表明应警惕文化刻板印象。研究结果还表明,在临床诊疗中,决策中的参与偏好应与信息需求分开考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbf7/6755644/ceb3d7f17986/10.1177_2381468319871018-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbf7/6755644/e642d0ba3cde/10.1177_2381468319871018-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbf7/6755644/ceb3d7f17986/10.1177_2381468319871018-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbf7/6755644/e642d0ba3cde/10.1177_2381468319871018-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbf7/6755644/ceb3d7f17986/10.1177_2381468319871018-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis.澳大利亚和中国的文化、自我与医疗决策:结构模型分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Sep 20;4(2):2381468319871018. doi: 10.1177/2381468319871018. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
2
Culture and medical decision making: Healthcare consumer perspectives in Japan and the United States.文化与医疗决策:日本和美国医疗消费者的观点
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34(12):1133-44. doi: 10.1037/hea0000229. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Who Decides: Me or We? Family Involvement in Medical Decision Making in Eastern and Western Countries.谁来决定:我还是我们?东西方国家医疗决策中的家庭参与
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):14-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17715628. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
4
Family involvement in medical decision making in Europe and the United States: A replication and extension in five Countries.家庭在欧洲和美国医疗决策中的参与:五个国家的复制与扩展。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114932. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114932. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Treatment decision making experiences of migrant cancer patients and their families in Australia.澳大利亚移民癌症患者及其家庭的治疗决策经历。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun;98(6):742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
6
Impact of Physician-Patient Communication in Online Health Communities on Patient Compliance: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.在线健康社区中医师-患者沟通对患者依从性的影响:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 13;21(5):e12891. doi: 10.2196/12891.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.低教育水平和识字能力的成年人中与知情决策及参与肠癌筛查相关的因素
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):756-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13518976. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
What factors influence the treatment decisions of women with breast cancer? Does residential location play a role?哪些因素会影响乳腺癌女性的治疗决策?居住地点会有影响吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2019 May;19(2):4497. doi: 10.22605/RRH4497. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming through simulation-based learning: Lived experiences of occupational therapy students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.通过基于模拟的学习实现成长:来自文化和语言背景多样的职业治疗专业学生的亲身经历。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Aug;72(4):e70044. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70044.
2
Support Networks and Care Needs: Insights From Older Vietnam-Born Australians Living With Chronic Disease.支持网络与护理需求:来自患有慢性病的越南出生的澳大利亚老年人的见解。
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Jun;27(2):e70158. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70158.
3
Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of Barriers to Patient Participation: Are They Due to Language, Culture, or Discrimination?患者参与障碍的认知:是语言、文化还是歧视导致的?
Health Commun. 2019 Nov;34(12):1469-1481. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1500431. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
The effects of culturally targeted patient decision aids on medical consultation preparation for Hispanic women in the U.S.: Results from four randomized experiments.文化针对性患者决策辅助工具对美国西班牙裔女性医疗咨询准备的影响:四项随机实验的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;212:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Predicting the preferences for involvement in medical decision making among patients with mental disorders.
癌症患者及其朋友和家人的信息获取和使用:扎根理论的发展。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e20510. doi: 10.2196/20510.
预测精神障碍患者参与医疗决策的偏好。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0182203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182203. eCollection 2017.
4
Patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process for treating diabetic retinopathy.患者参与糖尿病视网膜病变治疗决策过程的偏好。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0526-z.
5
Who Decides: Me or We? Family Involvement in Medical Decision Making in Eastern and Western Countries.谁来决定:我还是我们?东西方国家医疗决策中的家庭参与
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):14-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17715628. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic.患者参与决策:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e010063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063.
7
Improving Medical Decision Making and Health Promotion through Culture-Sensitive Health Communication: An Agenda for Science and Practice.通过文化敏感型健康传播改善医疗决策与健康促进:科学与实践议程
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):811-33. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15600434. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
8
Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution.文化与自我:一个相互构成的循环。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;5(4):420-30. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375557.
9
Culture and medical decision making: Healthcare consumer perspectives in Japan and the United States.文化与医疗决策:日本和美国医疗消费者的观点
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34(12):1133-44. doi: 10.1037/hea0000229. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
10
Imbalance of power between patients and doctors.医患之间的权力失衡。
BMJ. 2014 Dec 15;349:g7485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7485.