Helfer Karen S, Poissant Sarah F, Merchant Gabrielle R
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Center for Hearing Research, Boys town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th St., Omaha, NE 68131.
Ear Hear. 2020 May/Jun;41(3):603-614. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000786.
The purpose of this experiment was to contribute to our understanding of the nature of age-related changes in competing speech perception using a temporally interleaved task.
Younger and older adults (n = 16/group) participated in this study. The target was a five-word sentence. The masker was one of the following: another five-word sentence; five brief samples of modulated noise; or five brief samples of environmental sounds. The stimuli were presented in a temporally interleaved manner, where the target and masker alternated in time, always beginning with the target. Word order was manipulated in the target (and in the masker during trials with interleaved words) to compare performance when the five words in each stream did versus did not create a syntactically correct sentence. Talker voice consistency also was examined by contrasting performance when each word in the target was spoken by the same talker or by different talkers; a similar manipulation was used for the masker when it consisted of words. Participants were instructed to repeat back the target words and ignore the intervening words or sounds. Participants also completed a subset of tests from the NIH Cognitive Toolbox.
Performance on this interleaved task was significantly associated with listener age and with a metric of cognitive flexibility, but it was not related to the degree of high-frequency hearing loss. Younger adults' performance on this task was better than that of older adults, especially for words located toward the end of the sentence. Both groups of participants were able to take advantage of correct word order in the target, and both were negatively affected, to a modest extent, when the masker words were in correct syntactic order. The two groups did not differ in how phonetic similarity between target and masker words influenced performance, and interleaved environmental sounds or noise had only a minimal effect for all listeners. The most robust difference between listener groups was found for the use of voice consistency: older adults, as compared with younger adults, were less able to take advantage of a consistent target talker within a trial.
Younger adults outperformed older adults when masker words were interleaved with target words. Results suggest that this difference was unlikely to be related to energetic masking and/or peripheral hearing loss. Rather, age-related changes in cognitive flexibility and problems encoding voice information appeared to underlie group differences. These results support the contention that, in real-life competing speech situations that produce both energetic and informational masking, older adults' problems are due to both peripheral and nonperipheral changes.
本实验旨在通过使用时间交错任务,帮助我们理解竞争性言语感知中与年龄相关变化的本质。
年轻和年长成年人(每组n = 16)参与了本研究。目标是一个由五个单词组成的句子。掩蔽音为以下之一:另一个由五个单词组成的句子;五个调制噪声的简短样本;或五个环境声音的简短样本。刺激以时间交错的方式呈现,目标和掩蔽音在时间上交替出现,总是从目标开始。在目标中(以及在交错单词的试验中在掩蔽音中)操纵单词顺序,以比较每个流中的五个单词是否构成语法正确的句子时的表现。还通过对比目标中的每个单词由同一个说话者或不同说话者说出时的表现来检查说话者声音的一致性;当掩蔽音由单词组成时,对掩蔽音也进行类似的操作。指示参与者重复目标单词并忽略中间的单词或声音。参与者还完成了美国国立卫生研究院认知工具箱中的一组测试。
在这个交错任务上的表现与听众年龄以及认知灵活性指标显著相关,但与高频听力损失程度无关。年轻成年人在这项任务上的表现优于年长成年人,尤其是对于句子末尾的单词。两组参与者都能够利用目标中的正确单词顺序,并且当掩蔽音单词具有正确的句法顺序时,两组都会受到一定程度的负面影响。目标词和掩蔽音词之间的语音相似性对表现的影响在两组之间没有差异,并且交错的环境声音或噪声对所有听众的影响都很小。听众组之间最显著的差异在于声音一致性的使用:与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人在一次试验中更难以利用一致的目标说话者。
当掩蔽音单词与目标单词交错时,年轻成年人的表现优于年长成年人。结果表明,这种差异不太可能与能量掩蔽和/或外周听力损失有关。相反,认知灵活性的年龄相关变化和语音信息编码问题似乎是组间差异的基础。这些结果支持了这样的观点,即在产生能量掩蔽和信息掩蔽的现实生活中的竞争性言语情境中,年长成年人的问题是由外周和非外周变化共同导致的。