Helfer Karen S, Jesse Alexandra
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 358 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):363-76. doi: 10.1121/1.4923155.
The influence of lexical characteristics of words in to-be-attended and to-be-ignored speech streams was examined in a competing speech task. Older, middle-aged, and younger adults heard pairs of low-cloze probability sentences in which the frequency or neighborhood density of words was manipulated in either the target speech stream or the masking speech stream. All participants also completed a battery of cognitive measures. As expected, for all groups, target words that occur frequently or that are from sparse lexical neighborhoods were easier to recognize than words that are infrequent or from dense neighborhoods. Compared to other groups, these neighborhood density effects were largest for older adults; the frequency effect was largest for middle-aged adults. Lexical characteristics of words in the to-be-ignored speech stream also affected recognition of to-be-attended words, but only when overall performance was relatively good (that is, when younger participants listened to the speech streams at a more advantageous signal-to-noise ratio). For these listeners, to-be-ignored masker words from sparse neighborhoods interfered with recognition of target speech more than masker words from dense neighborhoods. Amount of hearing loss and cognitive abilities relating to attentional control modulated overall performance as well as the strength of lexical influences.
在一项竞争性言语任务中,研究了待关注和待忽略言语流中词汇特征的影响。老年人、中年人和年轻人听了一对低完形概率句子,其中目标言语流或掩蔽言语流中的单词频率或邻域密度被操纵。所有参与者还完成了一系列认知测试。正如预期的那样,对于所有组来说,频繁出现的目标词或来自稀疏词汇邻域的词比不常见的词或来自密集邻域的词更容易识别。与其他组相比,这些邻域密度效应在老年人中最大;频率效应在中年人中最大。待忽略言语流中单词的词汇特征也会影响待关注单词的识别,但仅当总体表现相对较好时(即,当年轻参与者以更有利的信噪比听言语流时)。对于这些听众来说,来自稀疏邻域的待忽略掩蔽词比来自密集邻域的掩蔽词对目标言语的识别干扰更大。听力损失程度和与注意力控制相关的认知能力调节了总体表现以及词汇影响的强度。