Suppr超能文献

一线铂类化疗与局部晚期或转移性肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌的生存结局。

First-line platinum-based chemotherapy and survival outcomes in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Cellular & Molecular Diagnostics Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2019 Nov;137:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare subtype of primary lung cancer. Due to the lack of prospective studies, the optimal first-line chemotherapy regimens and survival outcomes remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This real-world, retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with unresectable pulmonary LELC. The survival outcomes, prognosis, and comparative efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens were investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients were included in the analyses. The first-line chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine plus platinum (GP, n = 19 [15.0%]), taxanes plus platinum (TP, n = 70 [55.1%]) and pemetrexed plus platinum (AP, n = 38 [30.0%]). 25 (19.7%) patients underwent palliative thoracic radiotherapy. 60 (47.2%) patients had detectable baseline Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA. For the entire cohort, objective response was obtained in 41 patients (32.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.6-8.8) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 30.9-42.5), respectively. Among the three chemotherapy regimens, GP achieved the highest response rate (GP, 63.2% vs. TP, 30.0% vs. AP, 21.1%; p = 0.005). Median PFS in the GP group (8.8 months) was also significantly longer than that in the TP group (7.9 months) and AP group (6.4 months) (p = 0.031). In the multivariate model, cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.001), palliative thoracic radiotherapy (p < 0.001), and chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.031) remained independent prognostic factors for PFS; while cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p = 0.002), baseline EBV DNA (p = 0.033) and palliative thoracic radiotherapy (p = 0.041) were significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and palliative thoracic radiotherapy are active in pulmonary LELC. These data provide added evidence for the similarity between pulmonary LELC and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic area. Randomized controlled studies are needed to further define the standard-of-care for patients with advanced pulmonary LELC.

摘要

目的

肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌(LELC)是一种罕见的原发性肺癌亚型。由于缺乏前瞻性研究,其最佳一线化疗方案和生存结局仍不清楚。

材料和方法

本回顾性、真实世界研究纳入了不可切除的肺 LELC 连续患者。研究了不同化疗方案的生存结局、预后和比较疗效。

结果

共纳入 127 例患者。一线化疗方案包括吉西他滨联合铂类(GP,19 例[15.0%])、紫杉烷联合铂类(TP,70 例[55.1%])和培美曲塞联合铂类(AP,38 例[30.0%])。25 例(19.7%)患者接受了姑息性胸部放疗。60 例(47.2%)患者基线时可检测到 EBV DNA。在整个队列中,41 例(32.3%)患者获得了客观缓解。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 7.7 个月(95%CI,6.6-8.8)和 36.7 个月(95%CI,30.9-42.5)。在三种化疗方案中,GP 的缓解率最高(GP,63.2%vs.TP,30.0%vs.AP,21.1%;p=0.005)。GP 组的中位 PFS(8.8 个月)也显著长于 TP 组(7.9 个月)和 AP 组(6.4 个月)(p=0.031)。多变量模型中,一线化疗周期(p<0.001)、姑息性胸部放疗(p<0.001)和化疗方案(p=0.031)是 PFS 的独立预后因素;而一线化疗周期(p=0.002)、基线 EBV DNA(p=0.033)和姑息性胸部放疗(p=0.041)与 OS 显著相关。

结论

基于吉西他滨的化疗和姑息性胸部放疗对肺 LELC 有效。这些数据为流行地区肺 LELC 与鼻咽癌之间的相似性提供了额外的证据。需要进行随机对照研究,以进一步确定晚期肺 LELC 患者的标准治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验